These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30503933)

  • 1. The cerebral bases of the bouba-kiki effect.
    Peiffer-Smadja N; Cohen L
    Neuroimage; 2019 Feb; 186():679-689. PubMed ID: 30503933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing sound symbolism: Investigating phonetic forms, visual shapes and letter fonts in an implicit bouba-kiki experimental paradigm.
    De Carolis L; Marsico E; Arnaud V; Coupé C
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208874. PubMed ID: 30576331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Bouba-Kiki effect is predicted by sound properties but not speech properties.
    Passi A; Arun SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):976-990. PubMed ID: 36525201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating the Effect of Visual Imagery and Learning Shape-Audio Regularities on Bouba and Kiki.
    Graven T; Desebrock C
    J Vis Exp; 2019 Sep; (151):. PubMed ID: 31566604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bouba or kiki with and without vision: Shape-audio regularities and mental images.
    Graven T; Desebrock C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():200-212. PubMed ID: 29982038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When "Bouba" equals "Kiki": Cultural commonalities and cultural differences in sound-shape correspondences.
    Chen YC; Huang PC; Woods A; Spence C
    Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():26681. PubMed ID: 27230754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Touching words is not enough: how visual experience influences haptic-auditory associations in the "Bouba-Kiki" effect.
    Fryer L; Freeman J; Pring L
    Cognition; 2014 Aug; 132(2):164-73. PubMed ID: 24809744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Affective Arousal Links Sound to Meaning.
    Aryani A; Isbilen ES; Christiansen MH
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Aug; 31(8):978-986. PubMed ID: 32662741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The
    Ćwiek A; Fuchs S; Draxler C; Asu EL; Dediu D; Hiovain K; Kawahara S; Koutalidis S; Krifka M; Lippus P; Lupyan G; Oh GE; Paul J; Petrone C; Ridouane R; Reiter S; Schümchen N; Szalontai Á; Ünal-Logacev Ö; Zeller J; Perlman M; Winter B
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2022 Jan; 377(1841):20200390. PubMed ID: 34775818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-modal correspondences in sine wave: Speech versus non-speech modes.
    Silva DMR; Bellini-Leite SC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):944-953. PubMed ID: 31414363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. I know that "Kiki" is angular: The metacognition underlying sound-shape correspondences.
    Chen YC; Huang PC; Woods A; Spence C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):261-268. PubMed ID: 30097975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonological and orthographic influences in the bouba-kiki effect.
    Cuskley C; Simner J; Kirby S
    Psychol Res; 2017 Jan; 81(1):119-130. PubMed ID: 26403463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Bouba-Kiki Effect in Children With Childhood Apraxia of Speech.
    Gold R; Klein D; Segal O
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 65(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 34890216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensorimotor Representation of Speech Perception. Cross-Decoding of Place of Articulation Features during Selective Attention to Syllables in 7T fMRI.
    Archila-Meléndez ME; Valente G; Correia JM; Rouhl RPW; van Kranen-Mastenbroek VH; Jansma BM
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 29610768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Global shape perception contributes to crossmodal correspondences.
    Chen YC; Huang PC; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Mar; 47(3):357-371. PubMed ID: 33492162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Top-down task effects overrule automatic multisensory responses to letter-sound pairs in auditory association cortex.
    van Atteveldt NM; Formisano E; Goebel R; Blomert L
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1345-60. PubMed ID: 17513133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Language experience shapes fusiform activation when processing a logographic artificial language: an fMRI training study.
    Xue G; Chen C; Jin Z; Dong Q
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(3):1315-26. PubMed ID: 16644241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sound symbolism in sighted and blind. The role of vision and orthography in sound-shape correspondences.
    Bottini R; Barilari M; Collignon O
    Cognition; 2019 Apr; 185():62-70. PubMed ID: 30660923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response amplification in sensory-specific cortices during crossmodal binding.
    Calvert GA; Brammer MJ; Bullmore ET; Campbell R; Iversen SD; David AS
    Neuroreport; 1999 Aug; 10(12):2619-23. PubMed ID: 10574380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of audio-visual integration sites in humans by application of electrophysiological criteria to the BOLD effect.
    Calvert GA; Hansen PC; Iversen SD; Brammer MJ
    Neuroimage; 2001 Aug; 14(2):427-38. PubMed ID: 11467916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.