These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

487 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30504756)

  • 1. Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Zhao J; Zhang S; Li X; He B; Ou Y; Jiang D
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 Dec; 24():8693-8698. PubMed ID: 30504756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Disc Herniation with Biradicular Symptoms.
    Liu C; Zhou Y
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Dec; 120():e72-e79. PubMed ID: 30055359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single segmental lumbar disc herniation: A meta-analysis.
    Xue J; Song Y; Liu H; Liu L; Li T; Gong Q
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2022; 35(3):505-516. PubMed ID: 34602458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distinct fusion intersegmental parameters regarding local sagittal balance provide similar clinical outcomes: a comparative study of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Li F; Li C; Xi X; Zeng Z; Ma B; Xie N; Wang H; Yu Y; Cheng L
    BMC Surg; 2020 May; 20(1):97. PubMed ID: 32398125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
    Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of minimally invasive using a tubular retraction system versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases].
    Luo Z; Rao H; Huang D; Li G; Liu C; Dong S; Tian J
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Sep; 95(33):2681-5. PubMed ID: 26711822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the Medium-term Outcomes of Anterior Lumbar Discectomy and Fusion with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Song C; Deng Z; Dai H; Zheng W; Yu G; Wu Y; Luo J; Xu J
    Orthop Surg; 2024 May; 16(5):1042-1050. PubMed ID: 38531809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PARA-MEDIAN INCISION MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND OPEN TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR SINGLE SEGMENTAL LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASE].
    Qi Q; Xiao Q; Deng L; Li C; Dong X
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1253-8. PubMed ID: 26749734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-year postoperative outcomes between MIS and conventional TLIF in1-segment lumbar disc herniation.
    Lv Y; Chen J; Chen J; Wu Y; Chen X; Liu Y; Chu Z; Sheng L; Qin R; Chen M
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2017 Jun; 26(3):168-176. PubMed ID: 28084155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].
    Wen J; Yang Y; Zhang H; Liu L; Liu YL; Liu Y; Wang D; Wang ZP
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 Mar; 32(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 30921999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for massive lumbar disc herniation.
    Liu C; Zhou Y
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Jan; 176():19-24. PubMed ID: 30476700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Preliminary clinical outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases in a tertiary hospital: Is percutaneous endoscopic procedure superior to MIS-TLIF? A prospective cohort study.
    Ao S; Zheng W; Wu J; Tang Y; Zhang C; Zhou Y; Li C
    Int J Surg; 2020 Apr; 76():136-143. PubMed ID: 32165279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical efficacy and complications of MIS-TLIF and TLIF in the treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation: a comparative study.
    An B; Ren B; Liu Y; Han Z; Wu J; Mao K; Liu J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 May; 19(1):317. PubMed ID: 38807137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychological and Functional Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Yu B; Zhang J; Pan J; Wang Y; Chen Y; Zhao W; Wu D
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(4):1213-1226. PubMed ID: 33943023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microendoscopy-Assisted Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: 5-Year Outcomes.
    Yang Y; Liu ZY; Zhang LM; Pang M; Chhantyal K; Wu WB; Chen ZH; Luo CX; Rong LM; Liu B
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e602-e610. PubMed ID: 29778600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective observational study.
    Chen H; Zheng G; Bian Z; Hou C; Li M; Zhang Z; Zhu L; Wang X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 May; 18(1):389. PubMed ID: 37245051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Lee KH; Yue WM; Yeo W; Soeharno H; Tan SB
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Nov; 21(11):2265-70. PubMed ID: 22453894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.