234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30506455)
1. Prediction of therapy response in bone-predominant metastatic breast cancer: comparison of [
Azad GK; Taylor BP; Green A; Sandri I; Swampillai A; Harries M; Kristeleit H; Mansi J; Goh V; Cook GJR
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Apr; 46(4):821-830. PubMed ID: 30506455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does Measurement of First-Order and Heterogeneity Parameters Improve Response Assessment of Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer Compared to SUV
Azad GK; Cousin F; Siddique M; Taylor B; Goh V; Cook GJR
Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Aug; 21(4):781-789. PubMed ID: 30250989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer.
Minamimoto R; Loening A; Jamali M; Barkhodari A; Mosci C; Jackson T; Obara P; Taviani V; Gambhir SS; Vasanawala S; Iagaru A
J Nucl Med; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1862-8. PubMed ID: 26405167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic Value of Whole-Body DWI With Background Body Suppression Plus Calculation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient at 3 T Versus
Sun W; Li M; Gu Y; Sun Z; Qiu Z; Zhou Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Feb; 214(2):446-454. PubMed ID: 31799866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective Study of Serial
Peterson LM; O'Sullivan J; Wu QV; Novakova-Jiresova A; Jenkins I; Lee JH; Shields A; Montgomery S; Linden HM; Gralow J; Gadi VK; Muzi M; Kinahan P; Mankoff D; Specht JM
J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1823-1830. PubMed ID: 29748233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The value of baseline 18F-sodium fluoride and 18F-choline PET activity for identifying responders to radium-223 treatment in castration-resistant prostate cancer bone metastases.
Donners R; Tunariu N; Tovey H; Hall E; Chua S; Cook G; Du Y; Blackledge MD; Parker CC; Koh DM
Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):1146-1154. PubMed ID: 37615760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI compared with (18)F-NaF PET/CT for detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate carcinoma.
Mosavi F; Johansson S; Sandberg DT; Turesson I; Sörensen J; Ahlström H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov; 199(5):1114-20. PubMed ID: 23096187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 18F-FDG PET/CT is a prognostic biomarker in patients affected by bone metastases from breast cancer in comparison with 18F-NaF PET/CT.
Piccardo A; Puntoni M; Morbelli S; Massollo M; Bongioanni F; Paparo F; Altrinetti V; Gonella R; Gennari A; Iacozzi M; Sambuceti G; DeCensi A
Nuklearmedizin; 2015; 54(4):163-72. PubMed ID: 26165806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10.
Makhlin I; Korhonen KE; Martin ML; Gillman J; Schubert E; Pantel AR; Mankoff DA; Clark AS
Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2022 Nov; 4(6):e220032. PubMed ID: 36269154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective comparison of 18-FDG PET/CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI in the assessment of multiple myeloma.
Mesguich C; Hulin C; Latrabe V; Lascaux A; Bordenave L; Hindié E; Marit G
Ann Hematol; 2020 Dec; 99(12):2869-2880. PubMed ID: 32951093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pilot prospective evaluation of 99mTc-MDP scintigraphy, 18F NaF PET/CT, 18F FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI for detection of skeletal metastases.
Iagaru A; Young P; Mittra E; Dick DW; Herfkens R; Gambhir SS
Clin Nucl Med; 2013 Jul; 38(7):e290-6. PubMed ID: 23455520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incremental Value of Cocktail 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF PET/CT Over 18F-FDG PET/CT Alone for Characterization of Skeletal Metastases in Breast Cancer.
Roop MJ; Singh B; Singh H; Watts A; Kohli PS; Mittal BR; Singh G
Clin Nucl Med; 2017 May; 42(5):335-340. PubMed ID: 28263210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
Dyrberg E; Hendel HW; Huynh THV; Klausen TW; Løgager VB; Madsen C; Pedersen EM; Pedersen M; Thomsen HS
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 30132104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What Is the Comparative Ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MDP Skeletal Scintigraphy, and Whole-body MRI as a Staging Investigation to Detect Skeletal Metastases in Patients with Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma?
Aryal A; Kumar VS; Shamim SA; Gamanagatti S; Khan SA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Aug; 479(8):1768-1779. PubMed ID: 33635285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment response evaluation with
Sachpekidis C; Hillengass J; Goldschmidt H; Wagner B; Haberkorn U; Kopka K; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jan; 44(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 27573638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI diagnostic performance in M staging for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Machado Medeiros T; Altmayer S; Watte G; Zanon M; Basso Dias A; Henz Concatto N; Hoefel Paes J; Mattiello R; de Souza Santos F; Mohammed TL; Verma N; Hochhegger B
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3641-3649. PubMed ID: 32125513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is Response Assessment of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases Better with Measurement of
Azad GK; Siddique M; Taylor B; Green A; O'Doherty J; Gariani J; Blake GM; Mansi J; Goh V; Cook GJR
J Nucl Med; 2019 Mar; 60(3):322-327. PubMed ID: 30042160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective evaluation of planar bone scintigraphy, SPECT, SPECT/CT, 18F-NaF PET/CT and whole body 1.5T MRI, including DWI, for the detection of bone metastases in high risk breast and prostate cancer patients: SKELETA clinical trial.
Jambor I; Kuisma A; Ramadan S; Huovinen R; Sandell M; Kajander S; Kemppainen J; Kauppila E; Auren J; Merisaari H; Saunavaara J; Noponen T; Minn H; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M
Acta Oncol; 2016; 55(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 25833330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of
Zhang Y; Chen Y; Huang Z; Zhang L; Wan Q; Lei L
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2018; 2018():8271313. PubMed ID: 30254551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
