840 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30506687)
1. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental Multicenter and Multivendor Evaluation of the Performance of PET Radiomic Features Using 3-Dimensionally Printed Phantom Inserts.
Pfaehler E; van Sluis J; Merema BBJ; van Ooijen P; Berendsen RCM; van Velden FHP; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2020 Mar; 61(3):469-476. PubMed ID: 31420497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of Tracer Uptake Time in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Kolinger GD; García DV; Kramer GM; Frings V; Zwezerijnen GJC; Smit EF; de Langen AJ; Buvat I; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2022 Jun; 63(6):919-924. PubMed ID: 34933890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms.
Altazi BA; Zhang GG; Fernandez DC; Montejo ME; Hunt D; Werner J; Biagioli MC; Moros EG
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):32-48. PubMed ID: 28891217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability of
Crandall JP; Fraum TJ; Lee M; Jiang L; Grigsby P; Wahl RL
J Nucl Med; 2021 May; 62(5):707-715. PubMed ID: 33008931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robustness of Radiomic Features in [
Lu L; Lv W; Jiang J; Ma J; Feng Q; Rahmim A; Chen W
Mol Imaging Biol; 2016 Dec; 18(6):935-945. PubMed ID: 27324369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of image reconstruction settings on 18F-FDG PET radiomic features: multi-scanner phantom and patient studies.
Shiri I; Rahmim A; Ghaffarian P; Geramifar P; Abdollahi H; Bitarafan-Rajabi A
Eur Radiol; 2017 Nov; 27(11):4498-4509. PubMed ID: 28567548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of acquisition count statistics reduction and SUV discretization on PET radiomic features in pediatric 18F-FDG-PET/MRI examinations.
Branchini M; Zorz A; Zucchetta P; Bettinelli A; De Monte F; Cecchin D; Paiusco M
Phys Med; 2019 Mar; 59():117-126. PubMed ID: 30928060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability of Radiomic Features in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT Studies: Impact of Reconstruction and Delineation.
van Velden FH; Kramer GM; Frings V; Nissen IA; Mulder ER; de Langen AJ; Hoekstra OS; Smit EF; Boellaard R
Mol Imaging Biol; 2016 Oct; 18(5):788-95. PubMed ID: 26920355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The edge artifact in the point-spread function-based PET reconstruction at different sphere-to-background ratios of radioactivity.
Kidera D; Kihara K; Akamatsu G; Mikasa S; Taniguchi T; Tsutsui Y; Takeshita T; Maebatake A; Miwa K; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 26531181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimized Feature Extraction for Radiomics Analysis of
Papp L; Rausch I; Grahovac M; Hacker M; Beyer T
J Nucl Med; 2019 Jun; 60(6):864-872. PubMed ID: 30389820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interchangeability of radiomic features between [18F]-FDG PET/CT and [18F]-FDG PET/MR.
Vuong D; Tanadini-Lang S; Huellner MW; Veit-Haibach P; Unkelbach J; Andratschke N; Kraft J; Guckenberger M; Bogowicz M
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1677-1685. PubMed ID: 30714158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability of Radiomic Features of Brown Adipose Tissue.
Nazeri A; Crandall JP; Fraum TJ; Wahl RL
J Nucl Med; 2021 May; 62(5):700-706. PubMed ID: 33037091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Penalized-Likelihood Estimation Reconstruction on a Digital Time-of-Flight PET/CT Scanner for
Lindström E; Sundin A; Trampal C; Lindsjö L; Ilan E; Danfors T; Antoni G; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 59(7):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 29449445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Brain PET imaging optimization with time of flight and point spread function modelling.
Prieto E; Martí-Climent JM; Morán V; Sancho L; Barbés B; Arbizu J; Richter JA
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 26249138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeatability of [
Kolinger GD; Vállez García D; Kramer GM; Frings V; Smit EF; de Langen AJ; Dierckx RAJO; Hoekstra OS; Boellaard R
EJNMMI Res; 2019 Feb; 9(1):14. PubMed ID: 30734113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of PET/CT system, reconstruction protocol, data analysis method, and repositioning on PET/CT precision: An experimental evaluation using an oncology and brain phantom.
Mansor S; Pfaehler E; Heijtel D; Lodge MA; Boellaard R; Yaqub M
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6413-6424. PubMed ID: 28994465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Protocols for Harmonized Quantification and Noise Reduction in Low-Dose Oncologic
Machado MAD; Menezes VO; Namías M; Vieira NS; Queiroz CC; Matheoud R; Alessio AM; Oliveira ML
J Nucl Med Technol; 2019 Mar; 47(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 30076252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Parameters Influencing PET Imaging Features: A Phantom Study with Irregular and Heterogeneous Synthetic Lesions.
Gallivanone F; Interlenghi M; D'Ambrosio D; Trifirò G; Castiglioni I
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2018; 2018():5324517. PubMed ID: 30275800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
