These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30507224)

  • 1. Go/no-go training changes food evaluation in both morbidly obese and normal-weight individuals.
    Chen Z; Veling H; de Vries SP; Bijvank BO; Janssen IMC; Dijksterhuis A; Holland RW
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2018 Dec; 86(12):980-990. PubMed ID: 30507224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do impulsive individuals benefit more from food go/no-go training? Testing the role of inhibition capacity in the no-go devaluation effect.
    Chen Z; Veling H; Dijksterhuis A; Holland RW
    Appetite; 2018 May; 124():99-110. PubMed ID: 28442335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of attention in explaining the no-go devaluation effect: Effects on appetitive food items.
    Quandt J; Holland RW; Chen Z; Veling H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1119-1133. PubMed ID: 31144856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What Is Trained During Food Go/No-Go Training? A Review Focusing on Mechanisms and a Research Agenda.
    Veling H; Lawrence NS; Chen Z; van Koningsbruggen GM; Holland RW
    Curr Addict Rep; 2017; 4(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 28357193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When mere action versus inaction leads to robust preference change.
    Chen Z; Holland RW; Quandt J; Dijksterhuis A; Veling H
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Oct; 117(4):721-740. PubMed ID: 30920280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Explicit and Implicit Devaluation Effects of Food-Specific Response Inhibition Training.
    Tzavella L; Chambers CD
    J Cogn; 2023; 6(1):10. PubMed ID: 36721799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When not responding to food changes food value: The role of timing.
    Liu H; Holland RW; Veling H
    Appetite; 2023 Aug; 187():106583. PubMed ID: 37121485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How does not responding to appetitive stimuli cause devaluation: Evaluative conditioning or response inhibition?
    Chen Z; Veling H; Dijksterhuis A; Holland RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Dec; 145(12):1687-1701. PubMed ID: 27736134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Food-specific response inhibition, dietary restraint and snack intake in lean and overweight/obese adults: a moderated-mediation model.
    Price M; Lee M; Higgs S
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2016 May; 40(5):877-82. PubMed ID: 26592733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How can food choice best be trained? Approach-avoidance versus go/no-go training.
    Veling H; Verpaalen IAM; Liu H; Mosannenzadeh F; Becker D; Holland RW
    Appetite; 2021 Aug; 163():105226. PubMed ID: 33766617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Food-Specific Inhibition Training for Food Devaluation: A Meta-Analysis.
    Yang Y; Qi L; Morys F; Wu Q; Chen H
    Nutrients; 2022 Mar; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 35405975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Training response inhibition to reduce food consumption: Mechanisms, stimulus specificity and appropriate training protocols.
    Adams RC; Lawrence NS; Verbruggen F; Chambers CD
    Appetite; 2017 Feb; 109():11-23. PubMed ID: 27838443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do smokers devaluate smoking cues after go/no-go training?
    Scholten H; Granic I; Chen Z; Veling H; Luijten M
    Psychol Health; 2019 May; 34(5):609-625. PubMed ID: 30693789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Go/no-go training affects frontal midline theta and mu oscillations to passively observed food stimuli.
    van de Vijver I; van Schie HT; Veling H; van Dooren R; Holland RW
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Oct; 119():280-291. PubMed ID: 30199745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Double up! Examining the effects of adding inhibition training to food cue exposure in chocolate-loving female students.
    Bongers P; Houben K; Jansen A
    Appetite; 2018 Feb; 121():154-162. PubMed ID: 29154884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of obesity on the 30-day morbidity and mortality after surgery for endometrial cancer.
    Mahdi H; Jernigan AM; Aljebori Q; Lockhart D; Moslemi-Kebria M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 25064420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beyond inhibitory control training: Inactions and actions influence smartphone app use through changes in explicit liking.
    Johannes N; Buijzen M; Veling H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Mar; 150(3):431-445. PubMed ID: 32881564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in attention to food and food intake between overweight/obese and normal-weight females under conditions of hunger and satiety.
    Nijs IM; Muris P; Euser AS; Franken IH
    Appetite; 2010 Apr; 54(2):243-54. PubMed ID: 19922752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictors of dropout and bariatric surgery in Icelandic morbidly obese female patients.
    Benediktsdottir A; Halldorsson TI; Bragadottir GJ; Gudmundsson L; Ramel A
    Obes Res Clin Pract; 2016; 10(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25892541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Giving pork the chop: Response inhibition training to reduce meat intake.
    Camp B; Lawrence NS
    Appetite; 2019 Oct; 141():104315. PubMed ID: 31176649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.