177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30507552)
1. A practical approach to adjusting for population stratification in genome-wide association studies: principal components and propensity scores (PCAPS).
Zhao H; Mitra N; Kanetsky PA; Nathanson KL; Rebbeck TR
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2018 Dec; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 30507552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A propensity score approach to correction for bias due to population stratification using genetic and non-genetic factors.
Zhao H; Rebbeck TR; Mitra N
Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 33(8):679-90. PubMed ID: 19353632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fast and efficient correction for population stratification in multi-locus genome-wide association studies.
Liu R; Yuan M; Xu XS; Yang Y
Genetica; 2021 Dec; 149(5-6):313-325. PubMed ID: 34480683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clustering by genetic ancestry using genome-wide SNP data.
Solovieff N; Hartley SW; Baldwin CT; Perls TT; Steinberg MH; Sebastiani P
BMC Genet; 2010 Dec; 11():108. PubMed ID: 21143920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Principal-component analysis for assessment of population stratification in mitochondrial medical genetics.
Biffi A; Anderson CD; Nalls MA; Rahman R; Sonni A; Cortellini L; Rost NS; Matarin M; Hernandez DG; Plourde A; de Bakker PI; Ross OA; Greenberg SM; Furie KL; Meschia JF; Singleton AB; Saxena R; Rosand J
Am J Hum Genet; 2010 Jun; 86(6):904-17. PubMed ID: 20537299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sparse principal component analysis for identifying ancestry-informative markers in genome-wide association studies.
Lee S; Epstein MP; Duncan R; Lin X
Genet Epidemiol; 2012 May; 36(4):293-302. PubMed ID: 22508067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of methods for adjusting population stratification in genome-wide association studies: Standard versus categorical principal component analysis.
Turkmen AS; Yuan Y; Billor N
Ann Hum Genet; 2019 Nov; 83(6):454-464. PubMed ID: 31322288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Establishment of a standardized system to perform population structure analyses with limited sample size or with different sets of SNP genotypes.
Kumasaka N; Yamaguchi-Kabata Y; Takahashi A; Kubo M; Nakamura Y; Kamatani N
J Hum Genet; 2010 Aug; 55(8):525-33. PubMed ID: 20555335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Choice of population structure informative principal components for adjustment in a case-control study.
Peloso GM; Lunetta KL
BMC Genet; 2011 Jul; 12():64. PubMed ID: 21771328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adjusting for principal components can induce spurious associations in genome-wide association studies in admixed populations.
Grinde KE; Browning BL; Reiner AP; Thornton TA; Browning SR
bioRxiv; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38617337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Allowing for population stratification in case-only studies of gene-environment interaction, using genomic control.
Yadav P; Freitag-Wolf S; Lieb W; Dempfle A; Krawczak M
Hum Genet; 2015 Oct; 134(10):1117-25. PubMed ID: 26297539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Study of large and highly stratified population datasets by combining iterative pruning principal component analysis and structure.
Limpiti T; Intarapanich A; Assawamakin A; Shaw PJ; Wangkumhang P; Piriyapongsa J; Ngamphiw C; Tongsima S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jun; 12():255. PubMed ID: 21699684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic background comparison using distance-based regression, with applications in population stratification evaluation and adjustment.
Li Q; Wacholder S; Hunter DJ; Hoover RN; Chanock S; Thomas G; Yu K
Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 33(5):432-41. PubMed ID: 19140130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing the Utility of Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA to Adjust for Genetic Ancestry in Association Studies.
Miller B; Arpawong TE; Jiao H; Kim SJ; Yen K; Mehta HH; Wan J; Carpten JC; Cohen P
Cells; 2019 Apr; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 30987182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of population stratification adjustment using genome-wide or exonic variants.
Chen Y; Peloso GM; Liu CT; DeStefano AL; Dupuis J
Genet Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 44(7):702-716. PubMed ID: 32608112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of population structure using correlated SNPs by shrinkage principal components.
Zou F; Lee S; Knowles MR; Wright FA
Hum Hered; 2010; 70(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 20413978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On rare variants in principal component analysis of population stratification.
Ma S; Shi G
BMC Genet; 2020 Mar; 21(1):34. PubMed ID: 32183706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analyzing genetic association studies with an extended propensity score approach.
Zhao H; Rebbeck TR; Mitra N
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Oct; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 23104843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robust methods for population stratification in genome wide association studies.
Liu L; Zhang D; Liu H; Arendt C
BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Apr; 14():132. PubMed ID: 23601181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigating population stratification and admixture using eigenanalysis of dense genotypes.
Shriner D
Heredity (Edinb); 2011 Oct; 107(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 21448230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
