These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30507554)

  • 1. Image-based classification of bladder state using electrical impedance tomography.
    Dunne E; Santorelli A; McGinley B; Leader G; O'Halloran M; Porter E
    Physiol Meas; 2018 Dec; 39(12):124001. PubMed ID: 30507554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Supervised Learning Classifiers for Electrical Impedance-based Bladder State Detection.
    Dunne E; Santorelli A; McGinley B; Leader G; O'Halloran M; Porter E
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):5363. PubMed ID: 29599451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bladder volume estimation from electrical impedance tomography.
    Schlebusch T; Nienke S; Santos SA; Leonhardt S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():6441-4. PubMed ID: 24111216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bladder volume estimation from electrical impedance tomography.
    Schlebusch T; Nienke S; Leonhardt S; Walter M
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Sep; 35(9):1813-23. PubMed ID: 25139037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to the Discretization Problem in Wearable Electrical Tomography Imaging for Bladder Tracking.
    Baran B; Kozłowski E; Majerek D; Rymarczyk T; Soleimani M; Wójcik D
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multi-frequency symmetry difference electrical impedance tomography with machine learning for human stroke diagnosis.
    McDermott B; Elahi A; Santorelli A; O'Halloran M; Avery J; Porter E
    Physiol Meas; 2020 Aug; 41(7):075010. PubMed ID: 32554876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A realistic pelvic phantom for electrical impedance measurement.
    Dunne E; McGinley B; O'Halloran M; Porter E
    Physiol Meas; 2018 Mar; 39(3):034001. PubMed ID: 29271359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A deep neural network for estimating the bladder boundary using electrical impedance tomography.
    Konki SK; Khambampati AK; Sharma SK; Kim KY
    Physiol Meas; 2020 Dec; 41(11):115003. PubMed ID: 32726770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of electrical impedance tomography for determination of urinary bladder volume: comparison with standard ultrasound methods in healthy volunteers.
    Leonhäuser D; Castelar C; Schlebusch T; Rohm M; Rupp R; Leonhardt S; Walter M; Grosse JO
    Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Jul; 17(1):95. PubMed ID: 30005629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing machine learning algorithms for non-invasive detection and classification of failure in piezoresistive bone cement via electrical impedance tomography.
    Keiderling L; Rosendorf J; Owens CE; Varadarajan KM; Hart AJ; Schwab J; Tallman TN; Ghaednia H
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2023 Dec; 94(12):. PubMed ID: 38100565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Applied machine learning for stroke differentiation by electrical impedance tomography with realistic numerical models.
    Culpepper J; Lee H; Santorelli A; Porter E
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Dec; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 37939489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of deformable image registration algorithms on CT images of ex vivo porcine bladders with fiducial markers.
    Wognum S; Heethuis SE; Rosario T; Hoogeman MS; Bel A
    Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071916. PubMed ID: 24989394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative study of separation between ex vivo prostatic malignant and benign tissue using electrical impedance spectroscopy and electrical impedance tomography.
    Murphy EK; Mahara A; Khan S; Hyams ES; Schned AR; Pettus J; Halter RJ
    Physiol Meas; 2017 Jun; 38(6):1242-1261. PubMed ID: 28282026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A review of image analysis and machine learning techniques for automated cervical cancer screening from pap-smear images.
    William W; Ware A; Basaza-Ejiri AH; Obungoloch J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Oct; 164():15-22. PubMed ID: 30195423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and reliability of noninvasive stroke volume monitoring via ECG-gated 3D electrical impedance tomography in healthy volunteers.
    Braun F; Proença M; Adler A; Riedel T; Thiran JP; Solà J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0191870. PubMed ID: 29373611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distributed network imaging and electrical impedance tomography of minimally invasive surgery.
    Otten DM; Onik G; Rubinsky B
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Apr; 3(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 15059018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noise-robust bioimpedance approach for cardiac output measurement.
    Murphy EK; Amoh J; Arshad SH; Halter RJ; Odame K
    Physiol Meas; 2019 Jul; 40(7):074004. PubMed ID: 30840932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic plankton image classification combining multiple view features via multiple kernel learning.
    Zheng H; Wang R; Yu Z; Wang N; Gu Z; Zheng B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(Suppl 16):570. PubMed ID: 29297354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bi-frequency symmetry difference electrical impedance tomography-a novel technique for perturbation detection in static scenes.
    McDermott B; Avery J; O'Halloran M; Aristovich K; Porter E
    Physiol Meas; 2019 Apr; 40(4):044005. PubMed ID: 30786267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.