These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30509892)

  • 1. Alternatives to Randomised Controlled Trials for the Poor, the Impatient, and When Evaluating Emerging Technologies.
    Mani K; Björck M
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2019 Apr; 57(4):598-599. PubMed ID: 30509892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Propensity Score Methods: Theory and Practice for Anesthesia Research.
    Schulte PJ; Mascha EJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1074-1084. PubMed ID: 29750691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Five Steps to Successfully Implement and Evaluate Propensity Score Matching in Clinical Research Studies.
    Staffa SJ; Zurakowski D
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1066-1073. PubMed ID: 29324498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning From Major Clinical Trials: Bending Without Breaking.
    Pfeffer MA
    Circulation; 2017 Dec; 136(23):2207-2209. PubMed ID: 29203564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distinguishing Between Efficacy and Real-World Effectiveness: The Case for Thinking Beyond Classic Randomized Controlled Trial Design.
    Sites BD; Masaracchia MM; Davis M
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2017; 42(2):131-132. PubMed ID: 28207640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Importance of proper conduct of clinical trials.
    Cortegiani A; Absalom AR
    Br J Anaesth; 2021 Feb; 126(2):354-356. PubMed ID: 33121749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Not Available].
    Giulio Formoso, per l'Associazione Alessandro Liberati - Network italiano Cochrane
    Recenti Prog Med; 2019 Nov; 110(11):524-525. PubMed ID: 31808432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role and significance of sensitivity analyses in enhancing the statistical validity of clinical studies.
    Baiocchi M; Woo YJ; Chiu P; Goldstone AB
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Feb; 163(2):749-753. PubMed ID: 33229182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistics in Brief: An Introduction to the Use of Propensity Scores.
    Inacio MC; Chen Y; Paxton EW; Namba RS; Kurtz SM; Cafri G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 473(8):2722-6. PubMed ID: 25773902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What Constitutes an Independent Statistical Analysis?
    Abraham A; Ahn R; Woodbridge A; Madden E; Keyhani S; Korenstein D
    J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 33(6):786-788. PubMed ID: 29549498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is Propensity Score Analysis a Valid Surrogate of Randomization for the Avoidance of Allocation Bias?
    Torres F; Ríos J; Saez-Peñataro J; Pontes C
    Semin Liver Dis; 2017 Aug; 37(3):275-286. PubMed ID: 28847037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propensity scores: a tool to help quantify treatment effects in observational studies.
    Patino CM; Ferreira JC
    J Bras Pneumol; 2017; 43(2):86. PubMed ID: 28538773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lessons from meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials for analysis of distributed networks of observational databases.
    Bate A; Chuang-Stein C; Roddam A; Jones B
    Pharm Stat; 2019 Jan; 18(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 30362223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reweighting Randomized Controlled Trial Evidence to Better Reflect Real Life - A Case Study of the Innovative Medicines Initiative.
    Happich M; Brnabic A; Faries D; Abrams K; Winfree KB; Girvan A; Jonsson P; Johnston J; Belger M;
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2020 Oct; 108(4):817-825. PubMed ID: 32301116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An introduction to instrumental variables analysis: part 1.
    Bennett DA
    Neuroepidemiology; 2010; 35(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 20861655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical power in parallel group point exposure studies with time-to-event outcomes: an empirical comparison of the performance of randomized controlled trials and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach.
    Austin PC; Schuster T; Platt RW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():87. PubMed ID: 26472109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Clinical trials: methodological requirements and interpretation].
    Windeler J; Lange S
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2009 Apr; 52(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 19322527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Propensity score studies are unlikely to underestimate treatment effects in critical care medicine: a critical reanalysis.
    Kitsios GD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 68(4):467-9. PubMed ID: 25555686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why do we continue to adopt medical practices based on pathophysiology alone when we should be insisting on clinical trials?
    Prasad V; Ho N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):361-3. PubMed ID: 24581292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomised trials in context: practical problems and social aspects of evidence-based medicine and policy.
    Pearce W; Raman S; Turner A
    Trials; 2015 Sep; 16():394. PubMed ID: 26341114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.