These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3051106)

  • 1. [Predictive value of magnetic resonance tomography in comparison with sonography and computed tomography in the diagnosis of focal liver lesions].
    Hauenstein KH; Wimmer B; Friedburg H; Hennig J
    Radiologe; 1988 Aug; 28(8):362-9. PubMed ID: 3051106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Magnetic resonance tomography of focal liver lesions in comparison with computed tomography and sonography].
    Hamm B; Römer T; Friedrich M; Felix R; Wolf KJ
    Rofo; 1986 Mar; 144(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 3008228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Diagnostic imaging of the liver: sonography/CT/MRI--clinical significance].
    Ramadori G; Neubauer K
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2005 Dec; 130 Suppl 5():S201-2. PubMed ID: 16435708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Radiological differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions with anatomo-pathological correlations].
    Osteaux M; Op De Beeck B; Hoorens A; Dujardin M; Goes E
    J Radiol; 2002 Feb; 83(2 Pt 2):269-91. PubMed ID: 11981496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Focal and diffuse benign hepatic disease: correlative imaging.
    Vassiliades VG; Bree RL; Korobkin M
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1992 Oct; 13(5):313-35. PubMed ID: 1419138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Modern, non-invasive diagnostic of focal liver lesions].
    Hauenstein K; Heller T
    Rontgenpraxis; 2005; 55(6):207-21. PubMed ID: 15906591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suspected liver metastases. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.
    Bree RL; Greene FL; Ralls PW; Balfe DM; DiSantis DJ; Glick SN; Kidd R; Levine MS; Megibow AJ; Mezwa DG; Saini S; Shuman WP; Laine LA; Lillemoe K
    Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215 Suppl():213-24. PubMed ID: 11037429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [High-field magnetic resonance imaging of the liver compared to x-ray computed tomography. Preliminary study apropos of 39 cases].
    Demaerel P; Marchal G; Aerts P; Van Fraeyenhoven L; Baert AL
    J Radiol; 1990 Jan; 71(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 2313627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imaging of focal liver lesions: the 90 %-rule.
    Mostbeck G
    Ultraschall Med; 2010 Dec; 31(6):545-7. PubMed ID: 21117006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Liver lesion characterization. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.
    Saini S; Ralls PW; Balfe DM; Bree RL; DiSantis DJ; Glick SN; Kidd R; Levine MS; Megibow AJ; Mezwa DG; Shuman WP; Greene FL; Laine LA; Lillemoe K
    Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215 Suppl():193-9. PubMed ID: 11037425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Detection of malignant focal hepatic lesions. Comparison of ultrasonography, computerized tomography during arterial portography, delayed computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging].
    Schneider F; Chapuis L; Gillet M; Leyvraz S; Schnyder P; Meuli R
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1999 Jan; 23(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 10219611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Characterization of hepatic neoplasms: contribution of magnetic resonance].
    Gualdi GF; Volpe A; Polettini E; Ceroni AM; Melone A; Casciani E
    Clin Ter; 1994 Jul; 145(7):53-63. PubMed ID: 7955951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Focal liver lesions.
    Lande IM; Hill MC
    Clin Diagn Ultrasound; 1988; 23():1-55. PubMed ID: 3078686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of real-time contrast-enhanced and real-time virtual sonography in the assessment of malignant liver lesions.
    Sandulescu L; Saftoiu A; Dumitrescu D; Ciurea T
    J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2009 Mar; 18(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 19337645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Focal liver lesion, incidental finding].
    Dietrich CF; Jenssen C
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2012 Oct; 137(41):2099-116. PubMed ID: 23033169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unusual appearance of focal nodular hyperplasia with fatty change.
    Chaoui A; Mergo PJ; Lauwers GY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1433-4. PubMed ID: 9798902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regional presentation of hepatic diseases: CT and MR imaging findings of differential diagnosis.
    Shang SS; Furlan A; Almusa O; Ahmed-Amr HM; Bae KT
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Oct; 51(8):832-41. PubMed ID: 20812886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Liver imagenology advances].
    Stoopen ME
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2005 Nov; 70 Suppl 3():37-40. PubMed ID: 17471855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Localisation of hepatic lesions to liver segments according to sonography (US), computed tomography (CT) and surgery (OP): a comparative study].
    Schacherer D; Decking D; Herold T; Obed A; Schlitt HJ; Gruene S; Schoelmerich J; Schlottmann K
    Z Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 48(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 20127599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evidence of liver metastases: CT or MR?].
    Rofo; 1997 Nov; 167(5):M38-9. PubMed ID: 9440883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.