197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30511173)
1. Optimization of a dedicated protocol using a small-voxel PSF reconstruction for head-and-neck
Ciappuccini R; Desmonts C; Licaj I; Blanc-Fournier C; Bardet S; Aide N
EJNMMI Res; 2018 Dec; 8(1):104. PubMed ID: 30511173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Staging the axilla in breast cancer patients with ¹⁸F-FDG PET: how small are the metastases that we can detect with new generation clinical PET systems?
Bellevre D; Blanc Fournier C; Switsers O; Dugué AE; Levy C; Allouache D; Desmonts C; Crouet H; Guilloit JM; Grellard JM; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Jun; 41(6):1103-12. PubMed ID: 24562642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incremental Value of a Dedicated Head and Neck Acquisition during 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.
Ciappuccini R; Aide N; Blanchard D; Rame JP; de Raucourt D; Michels JJ; Babin E; Bardet S
PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162482. PubMed ID: 27598385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The association of tumor-to-background ratios and SUVmax deviations related to point spread function and time-of-flight F18-FDG-PET/CT reconstruction in colorectal liver metastases.
Rogasch JM; Steffen IG; Hofheinz F; Großer OS; Furth C; Mohnike K; Hass P; Walke M; Apostolova I; Amthauer H
EJNMMI Res; 2015; 5():31. PubMed ID: 25992306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Penalized-Likelihood Estimation Reconstruction on a Digital Time-of-Flight PET/CT Scanner for
Lindström E; Sundin A; Trampal C; Lindsjö L; Ilan E; Danfors T; Antoni G; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 59(7):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 29449445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing lesion detection efficacy and image quality across different PET system generations to optimize the iodine-124 PET protocol for recurrent thyroid cancer.
Kersting D; Jentzen W; Sraieb M; Costa PF; Conti M; Umutlu L; Antoch G; Nader M; Herrmann K; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Weber M
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Feb; 8(1):14. PubMed ID: 33587222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on
Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of point spread function modelling and time of flight on FDG uptake measurements in lung lesions using alternative filtering strategies.
Armstrong IS; Kelly MD; Williams HA; Matthews JC
EJNMMI Phys; 2014 Dec; 1(1):99. PubMed ID: 26501457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimizing scan time and bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm in copper-64 PET/CT imaging: a phantom study.
Monsef A; Sheikhzadeh P; Steiner JR; Sadeghi F; Yazdani M; Ghafarian P
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38608316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for low-count clinical
Te Riet J; Rijnsdorp S; Roef MJ; Arends AJ
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 31889228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of (18)F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT using point spread function reconstruction for nodal staging of colorectal cancer.
Kawashima K; Kato K; Tomabechi M; Matsuo M; Otsuka K; Ishida K; Nakamura R; Ehara S
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 89(1063):20150938. PubMed ID: 27146065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influences of point-spread function and time-of-flight reconstructions on standardized uptake value of lymph node metastases in FDG-PET.
Akamatsu G; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Tsutsui Y; Baba S; Sasaki M
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):226-30. PubMed ID: 24144448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can a penalized-likelihood estimation algorithm be used to reduce the injected dose or the acquisition time in
Chicheportiche A; Goshen E; Godefroy J; Grozinsky-Glasberg S; Oleinikov K; Meirovitz A; Gross DJ; Ben-Haim S
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Feb; 8(1):13. PubMed ID: 33580359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of point spread function reconstruction on thoracic lymph node staging with 18F-FDG PET/CT in non-small cell lung cancer.
Lasnon C; Hicks RJ; Beauregard JM; Milner A; Paciencia M; Guizard AV; Bardet S; Gervais R; Lemoel G; Zalcman G; Aide N
Clin Nucl Med; 2012 Oct; 37(10):971-6. PubMed ID: 22899197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of
Hotta M; Minamimoto R; Yano H; Gohda Y; Shuno Y
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Jan; 18(1):4. PubMed ID: 29378659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF).
Rogasch JM; Suleiman S; Hofheinz F; Bluemel S; Lukas M; Amthauer H; Furth C
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Jan; 7(1):2. PubMed ID: 31925574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18.
Lasnon C; Majdoub M; Lavigne B; Do P; Madelaine J; Visvikis D; Hatt M; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Dec; 43(13):2324-2335. PubMed ID: 27325312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of block-sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction of
Lindström E; Lindsjö L; Sundin A; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Jun; 7(1):40. PubMed ID: 32542512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
