These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30511244)

  • 1. Predicting clinical outcome and length of sick leave after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in Sweden: a multi-register evaluation.
    Iderberg H; Willers C; Borgström F; Hedlund R; Hägg O; Möller H; Ornstein E; Sandén B; Stalberg H; Torevall-Larsson H; Tullberg T; Fritzell P
    Eur Spine J; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1423-1432. PubMed ID: 30511244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.
    Weber C; Giannadakis C; Rao V; Jakola AS; Nerland U; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S; Solheim O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E78-83. PubMed ID: 26352747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Grotle M; Solberg T; Brox JI; Hermansen E; Rekeland F; Indrekvam K; Storheim K; Hellum C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 30658613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison of surgical practice variation and clinical outcome in three national spine registries.
    Lønne G; Fritzell P; Hägg O; Nordvall D; Gerdhem P; Lagerbäck T; Andersen M; Eiskjaer S; Gehrchen M; Jacobs W; van Hooff ML; Solberg TK
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 29792994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.
    McGirt MJ; Bydon M; Archer KR; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):357-369. PubMed ID: 28498074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differentiation of pain-related functional limitations in surgical patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) using the Oswestry Disability Index: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) study.
    Charalampidis A; Canizares M; Kalsi PS; Hung Wu P; Johnson M; Soroceanu A; Nataraj A; Glennie A; Rasoulinejad P; Attabib N; Hall H; Fisher C; Thomas K; Rampersaud YR
    Spine J; 2022 Apr; 22(4):578-586. PubMed ID: 34699999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictors for failure after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational study.
    Alhaug OK; Dolatowski FC; Solberg TK; Lønne G
    Spine J; 2023 Feb; 23(2):261-270. PubMed ID: 36343913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characteristics and predicted outcome of patients lost to follow-up after degenerative lumbar spine surgery.
    Parai C; Hägg O; Willers C; Lind B; Brisby H
    Eur Spine J; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3063-3073. PubMed ID: 32666273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Obesity is associated with inferior results after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a study of 2633 patients from the Swedish spine register.
    Knutsson B; Michaëlsson K; Sandén B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Mar; 38(5):435-41. PubMed ID: 22941097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of catastrophising on treatment outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Park JW; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Nov; 97-B(11):1546-54. PubMed ID: 26530659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Obese patients report modest weight loss after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a study from the Swedish spine register.
    Knutsson B; Michaëlsson K; Sandén B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(20):1725-30. PubMed ID: 24921852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of pain sensitivity on surgical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Lee JI; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Ruscheweyh R; Kang SS; Yeom JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Feb; 40(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 25384051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incidental durotomy in degenerative lumbar spine surgery - a register study of 64,431 operations.
    Strömqvist F; Sigmundsson FG; Strömqvist B; Jönsson B; Karlsson MK
    Spine J; 2019 Apr; 19(4):624-630. PubMed ID: 30172899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Change in pain catastrophizing in patients with lumbar spinal surgery.
    Kim HJ; Kwon OH; Chang BS; Lee CK; Chun HJ; Yeom JS
    Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):115-121. PubMed ID: 28669860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective national spine registry observational study.
    Alhaug OK; Dolatowski FC; Solberg TK; Lønne G
    Spine J; 2021 Sep; 21(9):1489-1496. PubMed ID: 33848690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preoperative Factors Predict Postoperative Trajectories of Pain and Disability Following Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Hébert JJ; Abraham E; Wedderkopp N; Bigney E; Richardson E; Darling M; Hall H; Fisher CG; Rampersaud YR; Thomas KC; Jacobs WB; Johnson M; Paquet J; Attabib N; Jarzem P; Wai EK; Rasoulinejad P; Ahn H; Nataraj A; Stratton A; Manson N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Nov; 45(21):E1421-E1430. PubMed ID: 32541610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The value of patient global assessment in lumbar spine surgery: an evaluation based on more than 90,000 patients.
    Parai C; Hägg O; Lind B; Brisby H
    Eur Spine J; 2018 Mar; 27(3):554-563. PubMed ID: 29058135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of the Optimal Cutoff Values for Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire Scores and the Oswestry Disability Index for Favorable Surgical Outcomes in Subjects With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Park JW; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Kang SS; Yeom JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Oct; 40(20):E1110-6. PubMed ID: 26076437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictors for clinical outcomes of tubular surgery for endoscopic decompression in selected patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ikuta K; Sakamoto K; Hotta K; Kitamura T; Senba H; Shidahara S
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 Oct; 142(10):2525-2532. PubMed ID: 33811543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.