These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30512762)

  • 1. [Docimology of the national ranking exam in France: a need to better assess medical students’ reasoning].
    Quinton A; Rivière É
    Rev Prat; 2017 Sep; 67(7):716-718. PubMed ID: 30512762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Educational assessment of the first computerized national ranking exam in France in 2016: Opportunities for improvement].
    Rivière E; Quinton A; Neau D; Constans J; Vignes JR; Dehail P
    Rev Med Interne; 2019 Jan; 40(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 30093106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [National ranking exam 2006: advice of a highly ranked student].
    Girard C
    Rev Prat; 2006 Nov; 56(17):1923-4. PubMed ID: 17243394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The IDEA Assessment Tool: Assessing the Reporting, Diagnostic Reasoning, and Decision-Making Skills Demonstrated in Medical Students' Hospital Admission Notes.
    Baker EA; Ledford CH; Fogg L; Way DP; Park YS
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 25893938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Results of French medical students' ranking exam: The quest for the Holy Grail for students… and medical faculties?].
    Grosbois B
    Rev Med Interne; 2011 Jul; 32(7):397-9. PubMed ID: 21392864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Impact of training conferences on medical student's performance for the French National Ranking Examination in Lorraine University. The ETIMCEL experimental study].
    Agrinier N; Bannay A; Santini J; Braun M; Angioi K; Debouverie M; Zuily S;
    Rev Med Interne; 2015 Feb; 36(2):78-88. PubMed ID: 25109445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Consequences of critical appraisal of medical literature on 2009 National Ranking in France].
    Lorette G; Jolly D; Ambrosi P; Dreyfuss D; Magne JL; Kohler C; Duhaut P; Gérard JL
    Presse Med; 2010 Jun; 39(6):e118-25. PubMed ID: 20462733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Results of the 2012 national ranking in France].
    Jolly D; Lorette G; Ambrosi P; Dreyfuss D; Chaffanjon P; Le Jeunne C; Obert L; Rogez JM
    Presse Med; 2013; 42(7-8):1138-40. PubMed ID: 23414810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [National ranking exam. Advice from a highly ranked student].
    Sobanski V
    Rev Prat; 2009 Oct; 59(8):1117-8. PubMed ID: 19894455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Analysis of the discrimination of the final marks after the first computerized national ranking exam in Medicine in June 2016 in France].
    Rivière E; Quinton A; Dehail P
    Rev Med Interne; 2019 May; 40(5):286-290. PubMed ID: 30902508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Predictability of the results of the 2004 French national-ranking exam].
    Roussel F; Ladner J; Lechevallier J
    Presse Med; 2005 Jun; 34(11):791-3. PubMed ID: 16097379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Pros and cons of national ranking exam for medical students in France].
    Chabot JM
    Rev Prat; 2008 Oct; 58(16):1805-6. PubMed ID: 19143153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Results of the 2014 national ranking in France].
    Jolly D; Ambrosi P; Chaffanjon P; Dreyfuss D; Le Jeunne C; Lorette G; Obert L; Palombi O; Romanet JP
    Presse Med; 2015 May; 44(5):533-5. PubMed ID: 25683104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [National exam for the validation of the second medicine cycle in France: What does this examination evaluates?].
    Andrès E; Sananès N; Langer B; Pottecher T
    Presse Med; 2012 Jun; 41(6 Pt 1):e245-9. PubMed ID: 22336480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing musculoskeletal examination skills and diagnostic reasoning of 4th year medical students using a novel objective structured clinical exam.
    Stansfield RB; Diponio L; Craig C; Zeller J; Chadd E; Miller J; Monrad S
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):268. PubMed ID: 27741946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Letter on the article "Consequences of critical appraisal of medical literature on 2009 national ranking in France"].
    Giraudeau B; Maruani A
    Presse Med; 2011 Feb; 40(2):223; author reply 223-4. PubMed ID: 20843652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [2010 National Ranking in France: Results, classifications, consequences of critical appraisal of medical literature].
    Jolly D; Lorette G; Ambrosi P; Dreyfuss D; Magne JL; Kohler C; Duhaut P; Gérard JL; Rogez JM
    Presse Med; 2011 Apr; 40(4 Pt 1):447-8. PubMed ID: 21371854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Computerized ranking test in three French universities: Staff experience and students' feedback].
    Roux D; Meyer G; Cymbalista F; Bouaziz JD; Falgarone G; Tesniere A; Gervais J; Cariou A; Peffault de Latour R; Marat M; Moenaert E; Guebli T; Rodriguez O; Lefort A; Dreyfuss D; Hajage D; Ricard JD
    Rev Med Interne; 2016 Mar; 37(3):166-72. PubMed ID: 26827272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [To grade the national ranking exam ... and beyond].
    Chabot JM
    Rev Prat; 2008 Sep; 58(13):1457-8. PubMed ID: 18924332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [National ranking exam. What could happen at the exam?].
    Rev Prat; 2007 Jun; 57(12):1353-4, 1356-8. PubMed ID: 17717950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.