316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30512996)
1. Abbreviated Biparametric Versus Standard Multiparametric MRI for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Kang Z; Min X; Weinreb J; Li Q; Feng Z; Wang L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Feb; 212(2):357-365. PubMed ID: 30512996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Head-to-Head Comparison Between Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Woo S; Suh CH; Kim SY; Cho JY; Kim SH; Moon MH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):W226-W241. PubMed ID: 30240296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of biparametric and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Xu L; Zhang G; Shi B; Liu Y; Zou T; Yan W; Xiao Y; Xue H; Feng F; Lei J; Jin Z; Sun H
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Dec; 19(1):90. PubMed ID: 31864408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biparametric vs multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of prostate cancer in treatment-naïve patients: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis.
Alabousi M; Salameh JP; Gusenbauer K; Samoilov L; Jafri A; Yu H; Alabousi A
BJU Int; 2019 Aug; 124(2):209-220. PubMed ID: 30929292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic Performance of Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Niu XK; Chen XH; Chen ZF; Chen L; Li J; Peng T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):369-378. PubMed ID: 29894216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.
Tamada T; Kido A; Yamamoto A; Takeuchi M; Miyaji Y; Moriya T; Sone T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jan; 53(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 32614123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI: assessment of contrast benefit in clinical practice.
Zawaideh JP; Sala E; Shaida N; Koo B; Warren AY; Carmisciano L; Saeb-Parsy K; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Barrett T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):4039-4049. PubMed ID: 32166495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate cancer detection with biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) by readers with different experience: performance and comparison with multiparametric (mpMRI).
Gatti M; Faletti R; Calleris G; Giglio J; Berzovini C; Gentile F; Marra G; Misischi F; Molinaro L; Bergamasco L; Gontero P; Papotti M; Fonio P
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1883-1893. PubMed ID: 30788558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection After a Negative Prebiopsy MRI Examination: Comparison of Biparametric Versus Multiparametric MRI.
Gan JM; Kikano EG; Smith DA; Rao S; Podury R; Wang M; Durieux JC; Paspulati RM; Ponsky L; Ramaiya NH; Tirumani SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 May; 218(5):859-866. PubMed ID: 34817189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of biparametric prostate MRI for prostate cancer in men at risk.
Bass EJ; Pantovic A; Connor M; Gabe R; Padhani AR; Rockall A; Sokhi H; Tam H; Winkler M; Ahmed HU
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Sep; 24(3):596-611. PubMed ID: 33219368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.
Han C; Liu S; Qin XB; Ma S; Zhu LN; Wang XY
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Apr; 101(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 32063483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is dynamic contrast enhancement still necessary in multiparametric magnetic resonance for diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liang Z; Hu R; Yang Y; An N; Duo X; Liu Z; Shi S; Liu X
Transl Androl Urol; 2020 Apr; 9(2):553-573. PubMed ID: 32420161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bi- or multiparametric MRI in a sequential screening program for prostate cancer with PSA followed by MRI? Results from the Göteborg prostate cancer screening 2 trial.
Wallström J; Geterud K; Kohestani K; Maier SE; Månsson M; Pihl CG; Socratous A; Arnsrud Godtman R; Hellström M; Hugosson J
Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8692-8702. PubMed ID: 33890152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI for the detection of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion in biopsy naïve patients.
Caglic I; Sushentsev N; Shah N; Warren AY; Lamb BW; Barrett T
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 141():109804. PubMed ID: 34062473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abbreviated Protocols
Stanzione A; Ponsiglione A; Cuocolo R; Cocozza S; Picchi SG; Stilo S; Persico F; Creta M; Longo N; Imbriaco M
Anticancer Res; 2019 Aug; 39(8):4449-4454. PubMed ID: 31366543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The diagnostic performance in clinically significant prostate cancer with PI-RADS version 2.1: simplified bpMRI versus standard mpMRI.
Song J; Zhao C; Zhang F; Yuan Y; Wang LM; Sah V; Zhang J; Weng W; Yang Z; Wang Z; Wang L
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Feb; 48(2):704-712. PubMed ID: 36464756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With Biparametric MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Cuocolo R; Verde F; Ponsiglione A; Romeo V; Petretta M; Imbriaco M; Stanzione A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):608-621. PubMed ID: 33502226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prebiopsy Biparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2: A Multicenter Study.
Choi MH; Kim CK; Lee YJ; Jung SE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Apr; 212(4):839-846. PubMed ID: 30779662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Sensitivity and Specificity of Biparametric versus Multiparametric Prostate MRI in the Detection of Prostate Cancer in 431 Men with Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels.
Pesapane F; Acquasanta M; Meo RD; Agazzi GM; Tantrige P; Codari M; Schiaffino S; Patella F; Esseridou A; Sardanelli F
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 34359307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic value of integrated
Zeng Y; Leng X; Liao H; Jiang G; Chen P
Prostate Int; 2022 Jun; 10(2):108-116. PubMed ID: 35510079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
