These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30513024)

  • 1. A preliminary investigation into hearing aid fitting based on automated real-ear measurements integrated in the fitting software: test-retest reliability, matching accuracy and perceptual outcomes.
    Denys S; Latzel M; Francart T; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 58(3):132-140. PubMed ID: 30513024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characteristics of hearing aid fittings in infants and young children.
    McCreery RW; Bentler RA; Roush PA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):701-10. PubMed ID: 23575463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy and reliability of a real-ear-to-coupler difference measurement procedure implemented within a behind-the-ear hearing aid.
    Scollie S; Bagatto M; Moodie S; Crukley J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 22192606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress.
    Mueller HG
    Trends Amplif; 2001 Jun; 5(2):35-68. PubMed ID: 25425897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does probe-tube verification of real-ear hearing aid amplification characteristics improve outcomes in adult hearing aid users? A protocol for a systematic review.
    Almufarrij I; Munro KJ; Dillon H
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jul; 10(7):e038113. PubMed ID: 32690533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of predicted ear canal speech levels using the VIOLA input/output-based fitting strategy.
    Cox RM; Flamme GA
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 9562536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Longitudinal Predictors of Aided Speech Audibility in Infants and Children.
    McCreery RW; Walker EA; Spratford M; Bentler R; Holte L; Roush P; Oleson J; Van Buren J; Moeller MP
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36 Suppl 1(0 1):24S-37S. PubMed ID: 26731156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effect of venting the ear mold on speech discrimination in masking noise].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K; Fastl H
    HNO; 1991 Sep; 39(9):356-61. PubMed ID: 1748579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear?
    Ching TY; Psarros C; Hill M; Dillon H; Incerti P
    Ear Hear; 2001 Oct; 22(5):365-80. PubMed ID: 11605945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of real ear insertion gain in behind-the-ear hearing aids with different coupling systems to the ear canal.
    Jespersen CT; Møller KN
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Mar; 52(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 23301659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Counseling During Real Ear Measurements: The Clients' Perspective.
    Ryall A; Jenstad LM; Pumford J; Howe T; Grosjean G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Feb; 32(2):107-115. PubMed ID: 33588514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A "Goldilocks" Approach to Hearing Aid Self-Fitting: Ear-Canal Output and Speech Intelligibility Index.
    Mackersie C; Boothroyd A; Lithgow A
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):107-115. PubMed ID: 29894379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multi-programmable hearing aid.
    Mangold S; Eriksson-Mangold M; Israelsson B; Leijon A; Ringdahl A
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():70-5. PubMed ID: 2356739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 17496667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does Probe-Tube Verification of Real-Ear Hearing Aid Amplification Characteristics Improve Outcomes in Adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Almufarrij I; Dillon H; Munro KJ
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216521999563. PubMed ID: 33899603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Harmonic distortion measurements in clinical hearing and fitting. Preliminary report.
    Nielsen HB; Nielsen H; Parving A
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 2336541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An examination of the practicality of the simplex procedure.
    Preminger JE; Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Walters D; Levitt H
    Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):177-93. PubMed ID: 10890726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Venting Corrections Improve the Accuracy of Coupler-Based Simulated Real-Ear Verification for Use with Adult Hearing Aid Fittings.
    Scollie S; Folkeard P; Pumford J; Abbasalipour P; Pietrobon J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 May; 33(5):277-284. PubMed ID: 35325929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.