176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30513097)
1. Ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following anti-incontinence procedures (Monarc vs MiniArc): A 3-year post-operative review.
Lo TS; Chua S; Tan YL; Patrimonio MC; Pue LB
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0207375. PubMed ID: 30513097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following surgical anti-incontinence procedures (Monarc vs Miniarc).
Lo TS; Tan YL; Wu PY; Cortes EF; Pue LB; Al-Kharabsheh A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():91-7. PubMed ID: 25265496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.
Schellart RP; Oude Rengerink K; Van der Aa F; Lucot JP; Kimpe B; de Ridder DJ; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1179-85. PubMed ID: 25168619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The urethral motion profile before and after suburethral sling placement.
Shek KL; Chantarasorn V; Dietz HP
J Urol; 2010 Apr; 183(4):1450-4. PubMed ID: 20171657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. TVT Abbrevo and Miniarc suburethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence - A randomised controlled trial.
Melendez-Munoz J; Braverman M; Rosamilia A; Young N; Leitch A; Lee JK
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Nov; 230():141-146. PubMed ID: 30286363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized prospective study comparing Monarc and Miniarc suburethral slings.
Foote A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Jan; 41(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 25363659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following anti-incontinence procedures (Solyx™ tape): a 3-year post-operative review.
Lo TS; Ng KL; Hsieh WC; Jhang LS; Huang TX; Chuan CK
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Oct; 33(10):2749-2759. PubMed ID: 34487193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized, nonblinded extension study of single-incision versus transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence.
Schellart RP; Zwolsman SE; Lucot JP; de Ridder DJMK; Dijkgraaf MGW; Roovers JWR
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jan; 29(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 28577171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomised comparison of single-incision versus traditional transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of a 24-month follow-up.
Schellart RP; Oude Rengerink K; Van der Aa F; Lucot JP; Kimpe B; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jun; 27(6):871-7. PubMed ID: 26670576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized trial of a single incision versus an outside-in transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 12 month results.
Lee JK; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL; Lim YN; Muller R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 213(1):35.e1-35.e9. PubMed ID: 25637849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes following mid-urethral sling placement in patients with intrinsic sphincteric deficiency: comparison of Sparc and Monarc slings.
Rapp DE; Govier FE; Kobashi KC
Int Braz J Urol; 2009; 35(1):68-75; discussion 75. PubMed ID: 19254401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single incision mini-sling versus a transobutaror sling: a comparative study on MiniArc and Monarc slings.
De Ridder D; Berkers J; Deprest J; Verguts J; Ost D; Hamid D; Van der Aa F
Int Urogynecol J; 2010 Jul; 21(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 20204323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlations between Sonographic and Urodynamic Findings after Mid Urethral Sling Surgery.
Wen L; Shek KL; Subramaniam N; Friedman T; Dietz HP
J Urol; 2018 Jun; 199(6):1571-1576. PubMed ID: 29288123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
Nambiar A; Cody JD; Jeffery ST
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; (6):CD008709. PubMed ID: 24880654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is location of urethral kinking a confounder of association between urethral closure pressure and stress urinary incontinence?
Ling C; Shek KL; Gillor M; Caudwell-Hall J; Dietz HP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):488-492. PubMed ID: 32672377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sonographic appearance of transobturator slings: implications for function and dysfunction.
Chantarasorn V; Shek KL; Dietz HP
Int Urogynecol J; 2011 Apr; 22(4):493-8. PubMed ID: 20967418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Is initial success after Monarc(®) suburethral sling durable at mid-term evaluation?].
Betari R; Meynier J; Forzini T; François T; Hakami F; Saint F
Prog Urol; 2016 Jun; 26(7):409-14. PubMed ID: 27032312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sonographic assessment of compression effect on urethra following transobturator MUS.
Yu S; Sun L; Jiang J; Zhou Q
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Oct; 33(10):2849-2857. PubMed ID: 35013757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two outside-in transobturator midurethral slings in the treatment of female urodynamic stress incontinence.
Huang WC; Yang JM
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Nov; 61(6):1004-1008. PubMed ID: 36427964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association between sonographic sling location and success of surgery for stress urinary incontinence.
Hubka P; Masata J; Martan A; Dvorak J; Lincova M; Svabik K
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jul; 62(1):143-147. PubMed ID: 36508434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]