These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30513206)

  • 1. Converging a Knowledge-Based Scoring Function: DrugScore
    Dittrich J; Schmidt D; Pfleger C; Gohlke H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jan; 59(1):509-521. PubMed ID: 30513206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction.
    Velec HF; Gohlke H; Klebe G
    J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(20):6296-303. PubMed ID: 16190756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DrugScoreRNA--knowledge-based scoring function to predict RNA-ligand interactions.
    Pfeffer P; Gohlke H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(5):1868-76. PubMed ID: 17705464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Docking into knowledge-based potential fields: a comparative evaluation of DrugScore.
    Sotriffer CA; Gohlke H; Klebe G
    J Med Chem; 2002 May; 45(10):1967-70. PubMed ID: 11985464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
    Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DrugScore meets CoMFA: adaptation of fields for molecular comparison (AFMoC) or how to tailor knowledge-based pair-potentials to a particular protein.
    Gohlke H; Klebe G
    J Med Chem; 2002 Sep; 45(19):4153-70. PubMed ID: 12213058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. DSX: a knowledge-based scoring function for the assessment of protein-ligand complexes.
    Neudert G; Klebe G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2731-45. PubMed ID: 21863864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forging the Basis for Developing Protein-Ligand Interaction Scoring Functions.
    Liu Z; Su M; Han L; Liu J; Yang Q; Li Y; Wang R
    Acc Chem Res; 2017 Feb; 50(2):302-309. PubMed ID: 28182403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical potential for modeling and ranking of protein-ligand interactions.
    Fan H; Schneidman-Duhovny D; Irwin JJ; Dong G; Shoichet BK; Sali A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Dec; 51(12):3078-92. PubMed ID: 22014038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions: The CASF-2016 Update.
    Su M; Yang Q; Du Y; Feng G; Liu Z; Li Y; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Feb; 59(2):895-913. PubMed ID: 30481020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DrugScorePPI knowledge-based potentials used as scoring and objective function in protein-protein docking.
    Krüger DM; Ignacio Garzón J; Chacón P; Gohlke H
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89466. PubMed ID: 24586799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 2. Evaluation methods and general results.
    Li Y; Han L; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1717-36. PubMed ID: 24708446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.
    Wang R; Lu Y; Fang X; Wang S
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2114-25. PubMed ID: 15554682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. General and targeted statistical potentials for protein-ligand interactions.
    Mooij WT; Verdonk ML
    Proteins; 2005 Nov; 61(2):272-87. PubMed ID: 16106379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.
    Ferrara P; Gohlke H; Price DJ; Klebe G; Brooks CL
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jun; 47(12):3032-47. PubMed ID: 15163185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking.
    Wang R; Lu Y; Wang S
    J Med Chem; 2003 Jun; 46(12):2287-303. PubMed ID: 12773034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A practical approach to docking of zinc metalloproteinase inhibitors.
    Hu X; Balaz S; Shelver WH
    J Mol Graph Model; 2004 Mar; 22(4):293-307. PubMed ID: 15177081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of combined strategies for improving the performance of molecular docking.
    Xu S; Wang L; Pan X
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2021 Apr; 19(2):2150003. PubMed ID: 33641636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MiniMuDS: a new optimizer using knowledge-based potentials improves scoring of docking solutions.
    Spitzmüller A; Velec HF; Klebe G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jun; 51(6):1423-30. PubMed ID: 21528908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.