These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30514937)

  • 1. CRISPR-baby scientist fails to satisfy critics.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2018 Dec; 564(7734):13-14. PubMed ID: 30514937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The CRISPR-baby scandal: what's next for human gene-editing.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2019 Feb; 566(7745):440-442. PubMed ID: 30809070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to respond to CRISPR babies.
    Nature; 2018 Dec; 564(7734):5. PubMed ID: 31481729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genome-edited baby claim provokes international outcry.
    Cyranoski D; Ledford H
    Nature; 2018 Nov; 563(7733):607-608. PubMed ID: 30482929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Future of Gene Editing - Toward Scientific and Social Consensus.
    Rosenbaum L
    N Engl J Med; 2019 Mar; 380(10):971-975. PubMed ID: 30649992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Geneticists retract study suggesting first CRISPR babies might die early.
    Callaway E
    Nature; 2019 Oct; 574(7778):307. PubMed ID: 31616098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why were scientists silent over gene-edited babies?
    Kofler N
    Nature; 2019 Feb; 566(7745):427. PubMed ID: 30809071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. After the Storm - A Responsible Path for Genome Editing.
    Daley GQ; Lovell-Badge R; Steffann J
    N Engl J Med; 2019 Mar; 380(10):897-899. PubMed ID: 30649993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gene-edited babies: What went wrong and what could go wrong.
    Wang H; Yang H
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Apr; 17(4):e3000224. PubMed ID: 31039144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The First Chinese Edited Babies: A Leap of Faith in Science.
    Raposo VL
    JBRA Assist Reprod; 2019 Aug; 23(3):197-199. PubMed ID: 31436399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reboot ethics governance in China.
    Lei R; Zhai X; Zhu W; Qiu R
    Nature; 2019 May; 569(7755):184-186. PubMed ID: 31065097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Wisdom of Germline Editing: An Ethical Analysis of the Use of CRISPR-Cas9 to Edit Human Embryos.
    Gumer JM
    New Bioeth; 2019 Jun; 25(2):137-152. PubMed ID: 31130112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [CRISPR babies: technology and transgression].
    Jordan B
    Med Sci (Paris); 2019 Mar; 35(3):266-270. PubMed ID: 30931913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gene editing: who should decide?
    Akabayashi A; Nakazawa E; Caplan AL
    Nature; 2018 Dec; 564(7735):190. PubMed ID: 30542172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Creator of first gene edited babies faces "stern" punishment.
    Dyer O
    BMJ; 2019 Jan; 364():l346. PubMed ID: 30670454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Enhancement can do harm].
    Jordan B
    Med Sci (Paris); 2019; 35(8-9):709-711. PubMed ID: 31532388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Government report blasts creator of CRISPR twins.
    Normile D
    Science; 2019 Jan; 363(6425):328. PubMed ID: 30679349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Germline editing: could ban encourage medical tourism?
    Adashi EY; Cohen IG
    Nature; 2019 May; 569(7754):40. PubMed ID: 31040417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CRISPR-Cas9: a world first?
    The Lancet
    Lancet; 2018 Dec; 392(10163):2413. PubMed ID: 30527398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shock greets claim of CRISPR-edited babies.
    Normile D
    Science; 2018 Nov; 362(6418):978-979. PubMed ID: 30498103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.