412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30516046)
1. Controlled TiO
Zhou X; Zhao YY; Kim SR; Elimelech M; Hu S; Kim JH
Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Dec; 52(24):14311-14320. PubMed ID: 30516046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of water matrix on the rejection of neutral pharmaceutically active compound by thin-film composite nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Shah IA; Ali S; Yang Z; Ihsanullah I; Huang H
Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 3):135211. PubMed ID: 35660049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Permeability and selectivity of reverse osmosis membranes: correlation to swelling revisited.
Dražević E; Košutić K; Freger V
Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():444-52. PubMed ID: 24216230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recycling of end-of-life reverse osmosis membranes for membrane biofilms reactors (MBfRs). Effect of chlorination on the membrane surface and gas permeability.
Morón-López J; Nieto-Reyes L; Aguado S; El-Shehawy R; Molina S
Chemosphere; 2019 Sep; 231():103-112. PubMed ID: 31128344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dual modification of reverse osmosis membranes with NH
Farahbakhsh J; Najafi M; Golgoli M; Haeri SZ; Khiadani M; Razmjou A; Zargar M
Chemosphere; 2024 Aug; 361():142401. PubMed ID: 38795918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Swelling and morphology of the skin layer of polyamide composite membranes: an atomic force microscopy study.
Freger V
Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Jun; 38(11):3168-75. PubMed ID: 15224751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bench and pilot scale performance assessment of recycled membrane converted from old nanofiltration membranes.
Coutinho de Paula E; Martins PV; Ferreira ICM; Amaral MCS
Environ Technol; 2020 Apr; 41(10):1232-1244. PubMed ID: 30226794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications.
Xu P; Drewes JE; Bellona C; Amy G; Kim TU; Adam M; Heberer T
Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15765934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.
Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK
Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surface functionalization of reverse osmosis membranes with sulfonic groups for simultaneous mitigation of silica scaling and organic fouling.
Guan YF; Boo C; Lu X; Zhou X; Yu HQ; Elimelech M
Water Res; 2020 Oct; 185():116203. PubMed ID: 32731075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relating rejection of trace organic contaminants to membrane properties in forward osmosis: measurements, modelling and implications.
Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():265-74. PubMed ID: 24345822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response surface methodology and artificial neural network modelling for the performance evaluation of pilot-scale hybrid nanofiltration (NF) & reverse osmosis (RO) membrane system for the treatment of brackish ground water.
Srivastava A; K A; Nair A; Ram S; Agarwal S; Ali J; Singh R; Garg MC
J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 278(Pt 1):111497. PubMed ID: 33130432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rejection of trace organic compounds by high-pressure membranes.
Kim TU; Amy G; Drewes JE
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):335-44. PubMed ID: 16003994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of commercial nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane filtration to remove per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Effects of transmembrane pressures and water matrices.
Ma Q; Lei Q; Liu F; Song Z; Khusid B; Zhang W
Water Environ Res; 2024 Feb; 96(2):e10983. PubMed ID: 38291820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Supramolecular-Based Regenerable Coating Layer of a Thin-Film Composite Nanofiltration Membrane for Simultaneously Enhanced Desalination and Antifouling Properties.
Zhu X; Liang H; Tang X; Bai L; Zhang X; Gan Z; Cheng X; Luo X; Xu D; Li G
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2019 Jun; 11(23):21137-21149. PubMed ID: 31119932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recent progress in the applications of layer-by-layer assembly to the preparation of nanostructured ion-rejecting water purification membranes.
Sanyal O; Lee I
J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2014 Mar; 14(3):2178-89. PubMed ID: 24745210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct observation of bacterial deposition onto clean and organic-fouled polyamide membranes.
Subramani A; Huang X; Hoek EM
J Colloid Interface Sci; 2009 Aug; 336(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 19406423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Removal of emerging organic micropollutants via modified-reverse osmosis/nanofiltration membranes: A review.
Khoo YS; Goh PS; Lau WJ; Ismail AF; Abdullah MS; Mohd Ghazali NH; Yahaya NKEM; Hashim N; Othman AR; Mohammed A; Kerisnan NDA; Mohamed Yusoff MA; Fazlin Hashim NH; Karim J; Abdullah NS
Chemosphere; 2022 Oct; 305():135151. PubMed ID: 35654232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
