These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30517170)

  • 1. Influence of reward learning on visual attention and eye movements in a naturalistic environment: A virtual reality study.
    Bourgeois A; Badier E; Baron N; Carruzzo F; Vuilleumier P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0207990. PubMed ID: 30517170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visuo-spatial orienting during active exploratory behavior: Processing of task-related and stimulus-related signals.
    Macaluso E; Ogawa A
    Cortex; 2018 May; 102():26-44. PubMed ID: 28942896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The left hemisphere learns what is right: Hemispatial reward learning depends on reinforcement learning processes in the contralateral hemisphere.
    Aberg KC; Doell KC; Schwartz S
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Aug; 89():1-13. PubMed ID: 27221149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Value-driven attentional capture in neglect.
    Bourgeois A; Saj A; Vuilleumier P
    Cortex; 2018 Dec; 109():260-271. PubMed ID: 30391880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial selective attention biases are shaped by long-term musical experience and short-term exposure to tones.
    Cruse A; Offen K; Markant J
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Aug; 125():106-117. PubMed ID: 29990700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gambling against neglect: unconscious spatial biases induced by reward reinforcement in healthy people and brain-damaged patients.
    Lucas N; Schwartz S; Leroy R; Pavin S; Diserens K; Vuilleumier P
    Cortex; 2013; 49(10):2616-27. PubMed ID: 23969194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-modal influences on attentional asymmetries: Additive effects of attentional orienting and arousal.
    Thomas NA; Barone AJ; Flew AH; Nicholls MER
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():39-51. PubMed ID: 28063992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional and perceptual asymmetries in an immersive decision-making task.
    Klatt S; Ford PR; Smeeton NJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1847-1857. PubMed ID: 31808113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cingulate neglect in humans: disruption of contralesional reward learning in right brain damage.
    Lecce F; Rotondaro F; Bonnì S; Carlesimo A; Thiebaut de Schotten M; Tomaiuolo F; Doricchi F
    Cortex; 2015 Jan; 62():73-88. PubMed ID: 25239855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of dynamic bottom-up features and top-down control on the visual exploration of moving real-world scenes in hemispatial neglect.
    Machner B; Dorr M; Sprenger A; von der Gablentz J; Heide W; Barth E; Helmchen C
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Aug; 50(10):2415-25. PubMed ID: 22750122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal and human eye movements to clustered low value cues to increase decision rewards during search.
    Eckstein MP; Schoonveld W; Zhang S; Mack SC; Akbas E
    Vision Res; 2015 Aug; 113(Pt B):137-54. PubMed ID: 26093154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Past rewards capture spatial attention and action choices.
    Camara E; Manohar S; Husain M
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Oct; 230(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 23942640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gaze-contingent stimulus removal leads to subsequent changes in overt attentional allocation.
    Ludwig K; Schmid D; Schenk T
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Mar; 139():107297. PubMed ID: 31830484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Space exploration in neglect.
    Karnath HO; Niemeier M; Dichgans J
    Brain; 1998 Dec; 121 ( Pt 12)():2357-67. PubMed ID: 9874486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociable Components of Experience-Driven Attention.
    Kim H; Anderson BA
    Curr Biol; 2019 Mar; 29(5):841-845.e2. PubMed ID: 30773366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gaze behaviour during space perception and spatial decision making.
    Wiener JM; Hölscher C; Büchner S; Konieczny L
    Psychol Res; 2012 Nov; 76(6):713-29. PubMed ID: 22139023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanisms of value-learning in the guidance of spatial attention.
    Anderson BA; Kim H
    Cognition; 2018 Sep; 178():26-36. PubMed ID: 29758478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of working memory load on electrophysiological markers of visuospatial orienting in a spatial cueing task simulating a traffic situation.
    Vossen AY; Ross V; Jongen EM; Ruiter RA; Smulders FT
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Feb; 53(2):237-51. PubMed ID: 26524126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How exogenous spatial attention affects visual representation.
    Fernández A; Li HH; Carrasco M
    J Vis; 2019 Sep; 19(11):4. PubMed ID: 31504078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Looking left with left neglect: the role of spatial attention when active vision selects local image features for fixation.
    Ptak R; Golay L; Müri RM; Schnider A
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1156-66. PubMed ID: 19038381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.