143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30517477)
1. Survival, Reasons for Failure and Clinical Characteristics of Anterior/Posterior Composites: 8-Year Findings.
Montagner AF; Sande FHV; Müller C; Cenci MS; Susin AH
Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(6):547-554. PubMed ID: 30517477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are there universal restorative composites for anterior and posterior teeth?
Baldissera RA; Corrêa MB; Schuch HS; Collares K; Nascimento GG; Jardim PS; Moraes RR; Opdam NJ; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):1027-35. PubMed ID: 24001506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: A multilevel analysis in a birth cohort.
Collares K; Opdam NJ; Peres KG; Peres MA; Horta BL; Demarco FF; Correa MB
J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():79-84. PubMed ID: 29169969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient risk factors' influence on survival of posterior composites.
van de Sande FH; Opdam NJ; Rodolpho PA; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Cenci MS
J Dent Res; 2013 Jul; 92(7 Suppl):78S-83S. PubMed ID: 23690354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students.
Opdam NJ; Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM
J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 15193786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations.
Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1232-44. PubMed ID: 26321155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 18-year survival of posterior composite resin restorations with and without glass ionomer cement as base.
van de Sande FH; Rodolpho PA; Basso GR; Patias R; da Rosa QF; Demarco FF; Opdam NJ; Cenci MS
Dent Mater; 2015 Jun; 31(6):669-75. PubMed ID: 25863523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survival analysis of composite Dahl restorations provided to manage localised anterior tooth wear (ten year follow-up).
Gulamali AB; Hemmings KW; Tredwin CJ; Petrie A
Br Dent J; 2011 Aug; 211(4):E9. PubMed ID: 21869770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Longevity of 2- and 3-surface restorations in posterior teeth of 25- to 30-year-olds attending Public Dental Service-A 13-year observation.
Palotie U; Eronen AK; Vehkalahti K; Vehkalahti MM
J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():13-17. PubMed ID: 28529175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Caries risk and number of restored surfaces have impact on the survival of posterior composite restorations.
Balevi B
Evid Based Dent; 2014 Dec; 15(4):118-9. PubMed ID: 25522946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-year clinical performance of composite restorations placed by undergraduate dental students.
Moura FR; Romano AR; Lund RG; Piva E; Rodrigues Júnior SA; Demarco FF
Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 21537583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: results from a paediatric dental clinic.
Pinto Gdos S; Oliveira LJ; Romano AR; Schardosim LR; Bonow ML; Pacce M; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Torriani DD
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1248-54. PubMed ID: 25150105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorations - A practice based study.
Casagrande L; Laske M; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MCDNJM; Opdam NJM
J Dent; 2017 Sep; 64():30-36. PubMed ID: 28602850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 22-Year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics.
Da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Donassollo TA; Cenci MS; Loguércio AD; Moraes RR; Bronkhorst EM; Opdam NJ; Demarco FF
Dent Mater; 2011 Oct; 27(10):955-63. PubMed ID: 21762980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is composite repair suitable for anterior restorations? A long-term practice-based clinical study.
van de Sande FH; Moraes RR; Elias RV; Montagner AF; Rodolpho PA; Demarco FF; Cenci MS
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jun; 23(6):2795-2803. PubMed ID: 30368661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.
Casagrande L; Seminario AT; Correa MB; Werle SB; Maltz M; Demarco FF; Araujo FB
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):847-855. PubMed ID: 27103587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retrospective evaluation of posterior direct composite restorations: 10-year findings.
Lempel E; Tóth Á; Fábián T; Krajczár K; Szalma J
Dent Mater; 2015 Feb; 31(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 25480695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Longevity of composite restorations in posterior teeth placed by dental students: a 12-year retrospective study.
Alonso ALL; Tirapelli C; Cruvinel PB; Cerqueira NM; Miranda CS; Corona SAM; Souza-Gabriel AE
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Apr; 28(5):253. PubMed ID: 38630376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
