These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30517481)

  • 1. Retention Force and Wear Characteristics of three Attachment Systems after Dislodging Cycles.
    Marin DOM; Leite ARP; Oliveira Junior NM; Paleari AG; Pero AC; Compagnoni MA
    Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(6):576-582. PubMed ID: 30517481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.
    Choi JW; Bae JH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 27863857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
    Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention force and deformation of an innovative attachment model for mini-implant-retained overdentures.
    Valente MLC; Shimano MVW; Agnelli JAM; Dos Reis AC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):129-134. PubMed ID: 29961625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment systems.
    Kobayashi M; Srinivasan M; Ammann P; Perriard J; Ohkubo C; Müller F; Belser UC; Schimmel M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 23566266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Cyclic Dislodging on the Retention of Two Attachment Systems for Implant-supported Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    Tohme H; Makzoume J; Boulos P; Fakhoury J; Yared C; Salameh Z; Daou M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1386-1392. PubMed ID: 30602646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of four retentive anchor systems for implant supported overdentures--retention force changes.
    Bayer S; Steinheuser D; Grüner M; Keilig L; Enkling N; Stark H; Mues S
    Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 19371390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro comparison of the retentive properties of ball and locator attachments for implant overdentures.
    Türk PE; Geckili O; Türk Y; Günay V; Bilgin T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25216136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention force of Molloplast-B with ball attachment in implant-supported overdentures: An
    Salloum A; Alassafeen A; Kassis J
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(3):268-271. PubMed ID: 36511057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New mini dental implant attachments versus O-ring attachment after cyclic aging: Analysis of retention strength and gap space.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Cao YG
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2017 Jun; 37(3):419-424. PubMed ID: 28585142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retention force and fatigue strength of overdenture attachment systems.
    Botega DM; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Sep; 31(9):884-9. PubMed ID: 15369470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro investigation into retention strength and fatigue resistance of various designs of tooth/implant supported overdentures.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2012 Feb; 32(1):124-129. PubMed ID: 22282258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
    Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical performance and material properties of single-implant overdenture attachment systems.
    Alsabeeha NH; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 21519573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of simulated masticatory loading on the retention of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Abi Nader S; de Souza RF; Fortin D; De Koninck L; Fromentin O; Albuquerque Junior RF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Mar; 38(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 20819139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.