These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

721 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30517703)

  • 1. A map of direct TF-DNA interactions in the human genome.
    Gheorghe M; Sandve GK; Khan A; Chèneby J; Ballester B; Mathelier A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Feb; 47(4):e21. PubMed ID: 30517703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. UniBind: maps of high-confidence direct TF-DNA interactions across nine species.
    Puig RR; Boddie P; Khan A; Castro-Mondragon JA; Mathelier A
    BMC Genomics; 2021 Jun; 22(1):482. PubMed ID: 34174819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites.
    Håndstad T; Rye M; Močnik R; Drabløs F; Sætrom P
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Aug; 13():372. PubMed ID: 22863112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ChIPulate: A comprehensive ChIP-seq simulation pipeline.
    Datta V; Hannenhalli S; Siddharthan R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Mar; 15(3):e1006921. PubMed ID: 30897079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ChIPSummitDB: a ChIP-seq-based database of human transcription factor binding sites and the topological arrangements of the proteins bound to them.
    Czipa E; Schiller M; Nagy T; Kontra L; Steiner L; Koller J; Pálné-Szén O; Barta E
    Database (Oxford); 2020 Jan; 2020():. PubMed ID: 31942977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transcription factor-binding k-mer analysis clarifies the cell type dependency of binding specificities and cis-regulatory SNPs in humans.
    Tahara S; Tsuchiya T; Matsumoto H; Ozaki H
    BMC Genomics; 2023 Oct; 24(1):597. PubMed ID: 37805453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. De novo prediction of cis-regulatory elements and modules through integrative analysis of a large number of ChIP datasets.
    Niu M; Tabari ES; Su Z
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15():1047. PubMed ID: 25442502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving analysis of transcription factor binding sites within ChIP-Seq data based on topological motif enrichment.
    Worsley Hunt R; Mathelier A; Del Peso L; Wasserman WW
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):472. PubMed ID: 24927817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An improved ChIP-seq peak detection system for simultaneously identifying post-translational modified transcription factors by combinatorial fusion, using SUMOylation as an example.
    Cheng CY; Chu CH; Hsu HW; Hsu FR; Tang CY; Wang WC; Kung HJ; Chang PC
    BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. PubMed ID: 24564277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. BinDNase: a discriminatory approach for transcription factor binding prediction using DNase I hypersensitivity data.
    Kähärä J; Lähdesmäki H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2852-9. PubMed ID: 25957350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inferring transcription factor complexes from ChIP-seq data.
    Whitington T; Frith MC; Johnson J; Bailey TL
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Aug; 39(15):e98. PubMed ID: 21602262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor-DNA interactions.
    Gordân R; Hartemink AJ; Bulyk ML
    Genome Res; 2009 Nov; 19(11):2090-100. PubMed ID: 19652015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High resolution models of transcription factor-DNA affinities improve in vitro and in vivo binding predictions.
    Agius P; Arvey A; Chang W; Noble WS; Leslie C
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Sep; 6(9):. PubMed ID: 20838582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. iTAR: a web server for identifying target genes of transcription factors using ChIP-seq or ChIP-chip data.
    Yang CC; Andrews EH; Chen MH; Wang WY; Chen JJ; Gerstein M; Liu CC; Cheng C
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):632. PubMed ID: 27519564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sequence features and chromatin structure around the genomic regions bound by 119 human transcription factors.
    Wang J; Zhuang J; Iyer S; Lin X; Whitfield TW; Greven MC; Pierce BG; Dong X; Kundaje A; Cheng Y; Rando OJ; Birney E; Myers RM; Noble WS; Snyder M; Weng Z
    Genome Res; 2012 Sep; 22(9):1798-812. PubMed ID: 22955990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and multiplex sequencing (ChIP-Seq) to identify global transcription factor binding sites in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Brdlik CM; Niu W; Snyder M
    Methods Enzymol; 2014; 539():89-111. PubMed ID: 24581441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-targeted transcription factors motifs are a systemic component of ChIP-seq datasets.
    Worsley Hunt R; Wasserman WW
    Genome Biol; 2014 Jul; 15(7):412. PubMed ID: 25070602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A biophysical model for analysis of transcription factor interaction and binding site arrangement from genome-wide binding data.
    He X; Chen CC; Hong F; Fang F; Sinha S; Ng HH; Zhong S
    PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8155. PubMed ID: 19956545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrative analysis of ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq dataset.
    Zhu LJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1067():105-24. PubMed ID: 23975789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cell-type and transcription factor specific enrichment of transcriptional cofactor motifs in ENCODE ChIP-seq data.
    Goi C; Little P; Xie C
    BMC Genomics; 2013; 14 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S2. PubMed ID: 24564528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.