705 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30517703)
1. A map of direct TF-DNA interactions in the human genome.
Gheorghe M; Sandve GK; Khan A; Chèneby J; Ballester B; Mathelier A
Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Feb; 47(4):e21. PubMed ID: 30517703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. UniBind: maps of high-confidence direct TF-DNA interactions across nine species.
Puig RR; Boddie P; Khan A; Castro-Mondragon JA; Mathelier A
BMC Genomics; 2021 Jun; 22(1):482. PubMed ID: 34174819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites.
Håndstad T; Rye M; Močnik R; Drabløs F; Sætrom P
BMC Genomics; 2012 Aug; 13():372. PubMed ID: 22863112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ChIPulate: A comprehensive ChIP-seq simulation pipeline.
Datta V; Hannenhalli S; Siddharthan R
PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Mar; 15(3):e1006921. PubMed ID: 30897079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ChIPSummitDB: a ChIP-seq-based database of human transcription factor binding sites and the topological arrangements of the proteins bound to them.
Czipa E; Schiller M; Nagy T; Kontra L; Steiner L; Koller J; Pálné-Szén O; Barta E
Database (Oxford); 2020 Jan; 2020():. PubMed ID: 31942977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transcription factor-binding k-mer analysis clarifies the cell type dependency of binding specificities and cis-regulatory SNPs in humans.
Tahara S; Tsuchiya T; Matsumoto H; Ozaki H
BMC Genomics; 2023 Oct; 24(1):597. PubMed ID: 37805453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. De novo prediction of cis-regulatory elements and modules through integrative analysis of a large number of ChIP datasets.
Niu M; Tabari ES; Su Z
BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15():1047. PubMed ID: 25442502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving analysis of transcription factor binding sites within ChIP-Seq data based on topological motif enrichment.
Worsley Hunt R; Mathelier A; Del Peso L; Wasserman WW
BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):472. PubMed ID: 24927817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An improved ChIP-seq peak detection system for simultaneously identifying post-translational modified transcription factors by combinatorial fusion, using SUMOylation as an example.
Cheng CY; Chu CH; Hsu HW; Hsu FR; Tang CY; Wang WC; Kung HJ; Chang PC
BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. PubMed ID: 24564277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. BinDNase: a discriminatory approach for transcription factor binding prediction using DNase I hypersensitivity data.
Kähärä J; Lähdesmäki H
Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2852-9. PubMed ID: 25957350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inferring transcription factor complexes from ChIP-seq data.
Whitington T; Frith MC; Johnson J; Bailey TL
Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Aug; 39(15):e98. PubMed ID: 21602262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor-DNA interactions.
Gordân R; Hartemink AJ; Bulyk ML
Genome Res; 2009 Nov; 19(11):2090-100. PubMed ID: 19652015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High resolution models of transcription factor-DNA affinities improve in vitro and in vivo binding predictions.
Agius P; Arvey A; Chang W; Noble WS; Leslie C
PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Sep; 6(9):. PubMed ID: 20838582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. iTAR: a web server for identifying target genes of transcription factors using ChIP-seq or ChIP-chip data.
Yang CC; Andrews EH; Chen MH; Wang WY; Chen JJ; Gerstein M; Liu CC; Cheng C
BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):632. PubMed ID: 27519564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sequence features and chromatin structure around the genomic regions bound by 119 human transcription factors.
Wang J; Zhuang J; Iyer S; Lin X; Whitfield TW; Greven MC; Pierce BG; Dong X; Kundaje A; Cheng Y; Rando OJ; Birney E; Myers RM; Noble WS; Snyder M; Weng Z
Genome Res; 2012 Sep; 22(9):1798-812. PubMed ID: 22955990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and multiplex sequencing (ChIP-Seq) to identify global transcription factor binding sites in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.
Brdlik CM; Niu W; Snyder M
Methods Enzymol; 2014; 539():89-111. PubMed ID: 24581441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-targeted transcription factors motifs are a systemic component of ChIP-seq datasets.
Worsley Hunt R; Wasserman WW
Genome Biol; 2014 Jul; 15(7):412. PubMed ID: 25070602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A biophysical model for analysis of transcription factor interaction and binding site arrangement from genome-wide binding data.
He X; Chen CC; Hong F; Fang F; Sinha S; Ng HH; Zhong S
PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8155. PubMed ID: 19956545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integrative analysis of ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq dataset.
Zhu LJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1067():105-24. PubMed ID: 23975789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cell-type and transcription factor specific enrichment of transcriptional cofactor motifs in ENCODE ChIP-seq data.
Goi C; Little P; Xie C
BMC Genomics; 2013; 14 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S2. PubMed ID: 24564528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
