These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation. Horrobin DF JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1438-41. PubMed ID: 2304222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Importance of peer-reviewed science in the debates on public policy. Scanes CG Poult Sci; 2009 Jan; 88(1):1. PubMed ID: 19096049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. How do peer reviewers of journal articles perform? Evaluating the reviewers with a sham paper. Kumar PD J Assoc Physicians India; 1999 Feb; 47(2):198-200. PubMed ID: 10999090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rigorous Peer Review is Worth the Effort. Kearney MH Res Nurs Health; 2016 Dec; 39(6):393-395. PubMed ID: 27740694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Lux and veritas: approaching the thorny process of peer-review and "peer-review" 2011. Apuzzo ML World Neurosurg; 2011; 76(1-2):1. PubMed ID: 21839925 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantity does not equal quality: Scientific principles cannot be sacrificed. Rzymski P; Nowicki M; Mullin GE; Abraham A; Rodríguez-Román E; Petzold MB; Bendau A; Sahu KK; Ather A; Naviaux AF; Janne P; Gourdin M; Delanghe JR; Ochs HD; Talmadge JE; Garg M; Hamblin MR; Rezaei N Int Immunopharmacol; 2020 Sep; 86():106711. PubMed ID: 32585609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation of social relevance of applied health research: a rough indicator may be the significance of publishing in national professional journals]. Bouter LM; Knottnerus JA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(24):1178-83. PubMed ID: 10876699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peer review fraud-it's not big and it's not clever. Rahman S; Baumgartner MR; Morava E; Patterson M; Peters V; Zschocke J J Inherit Metab Dis; 2016 Jan; 39(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 26660661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reporting clinical trials: full access to all the data. Rosenberg RN; Aminoff M; Boller F; Soerensen PS; Griggs RC; Hachinski V; Hallett M; Johnson RT; Kennard C; Lang AE; Lees AJ; Lisak R; Newsom-Davis J; Pedley TA; Selzer ME; Zochodne D Brain; 2002 Mar; 125(Pt 3):i-ii. PubMed ID: 11872625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Institutional review boards and consumer surveys. Hogue LL Am J Public Health; 1979 Jul; 69(7):649-50. PubMed ID: 453390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]