175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30519590)
1. Impact of Intravenous Fluid Challenge Infusion Time on Macrocirculation and Endothelial Glycocalyx in Surgical and Critically Ill Patients.
Pouska J; Tegl V; Astapenko D; Cerny V; Lehmann C; Benes J
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():8925345. PubMed ID: 30519590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Choice of assessment time after fluid challenge in patients with septic shock].
Huang H; Liu G; Xu B; Yang T; Du B
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2019 Apr; 31(4):407-412. PubMed ID: 31109411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intravenous fluid resuscitation is associated with septic endothelial glycocalyx degradation.
Hippensteel JA; Uchimido R; Tyler PD; Burke RC; Han X; Zhang F; McMurtry SA; Colbert JF; Lindsell CJ; Angus DC; Kellum JA; Yealy DM; Linhardt RJ; Shapiro NI; Schmidt EP
Crit Care; 2019 Jul; 23(1):259. PubMed ID: 31337421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasound Assessment of the Change in Carotid Corrected Flow Time in Fluid Responsiveness in Undifferentiated Shock.
Barjaktarevic I; Toppen WE; Hu S; Aquije Montoya E; Ong S; Buhr R; David IJ; Wang T; Rezayat T; Chang SY; Elashoff D; Markovic D; Berlin D; Cannesson M
Crit Care Med; 2018 Nov; 46(11):e1040-e1046. PubMed ID: 30134304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine infusion on fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.
Yu T; Huang Y; Guo F; Yang Y; Teboul JL; Qiu H
J Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 185(2):763-73. PubMed ID: 23953789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association of sublingual microcirculation parameters and endothelial glycocalyx dimensions in resuscitated sepsis.
Rovas A; Seidel LM; Vink H; Pohlkötter T; Pavenstädt H; Ertmer C; Hessler M; Kümpers P
Crit Care; 2019 Jul; 23(1):260. PubMed ID: 31340868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Effective arterial elastance in evaluating the fluid challenge in septic shock patients].
Yang T; Huang H; Weng L; Du B
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2021 Mar; 33(3):269-275. PubMed ID: 33834966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endothelial and Glycocalyx Biomarkers in Children With Sepsis After One Bolus of Unbalanced or Balanced Crystalloids.
Fernández-Sarmiento J; Salazar-Peláez LM; Acevedo L; Niño-Serna LF; Flórez S; Alarcón-Forero L; Mulett H; Gómez L; Villar JC
Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2023 Mar; 24(3):213-221. PubMed ID: 36598246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of fluid administration on arterial load in septic shock patients.
Monge García MI; Guijo González P; Gracia Romero M; Gil Cano A; Oscier C; Rhodes A; Grounds RM; Cecconi M
Intensive Care Med; 2015 Jul; 41(7):1247-55. PubMed ID: 26077088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hypertonic fluid administration in patients with septic shock: a prospective randomized controlled pilot study.
van Haren FM; Sleigh J; Boerma EC; La Pine M; Bahr M; Pickkers P; van der Hoeven JG
Shock; 2012 Mar; 37(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 22089205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of short-term administration of lipid emulsion on endothelial glycocalyx integrity in ICU patients - A microvascular and biochemical pilot study.
Astapenko D; Turek Z; Dostal P; Hyspler R; Ticha A; Kaska M; Zadak Z; Skulec R; Lehmann C; Cerny V
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 73(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 31306112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Alteration of the sublingual microvascular glycocalyx in critically ill patients.
Donati A; Damiani E; Domizi R; Romano R; Adrario E; Pelaia P; Ince C; Singer M
Microvasc Res; 2013 Nov; 90():86-9. PubMed ID: 23988876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Central venous-to-arterial PCO
Nassar B; Badr M; Van Grunderbeeck N; Temime J; Pepy F; Gasan G; Tronchon L; Thevenin D; Mallat J
Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):17256. PubMed ID: 34446823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A 10-second fluid challenge guided by transthoracic echocardiography can predict fluid responsiveness.
Wu Y; Zhou S; Zhou Z; Liu B
Crit Care; 2014 May; 18(3):R108. PubMed ID: 24886990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alterations of conjunctival glycocalyx and microcirculation in non-septic critically ill patients.
Pranskunas A; Tamosuitis T; Balciuniene N; Damanskyte D; Sneider E; Vitkauskiene A; Sirvinskas E; Pilvinis V; Boerma EC
Microvasc Res; 2018 Jul; 118():44-48. PubMed ID: 29462714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Predictive value of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference for fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: a prospective clinical study].
Liu G; Huang H; Qin H; Du B
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2018 May; 30(5):449-455. PubMed ID: 29764550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Renal perfusion assessment by renal Doppler during fluid challenge in sepsis.
Schnell D; Camous L; Guyomarc'h S; Duranteau J; Canet E; Gery P; Dumenil AS; Zeni F; Azoulay E; Darmon M
Crit Care Med; 2013 May; 41(5):1214-20. PubMed ID: 23591208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the Fluid Challenge in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Systematic Review.
Messina A; Longhini F; Coppo C; Pagni A; Lungu R; Ronco C; Cattaneo MA; Dore S; Sotgiu G; Navalesi P
Anesth Analg; 2017 Nov; 125(5):1532-1543. PubMed ID: 28514324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hemodynamic effects of different fluid volumes for a fluid challenge in septic shock patients.
Yang T; Weng L; Jiang W; Li S; Du B
Chin Med J (Engl); 2022 Mar; 135(6):672-680. PubMed ID: 34935687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
