These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30519714)

  • 21. [OLSA level control in monaural speech audiometry in background noise for the evaluation of the CI fitting result].
    Dziemba OC; Oberhoffner T; Müller A
    HNO; 2023 Feb; 71(2):100-105. PubMed ID: 36469098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge.
    Weiss R; Leinung M; Baumann U; Weißgerber T; Rader T; Stöver T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 May; 274(5):2107-2115. PubMed ID: 28032241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment.
    Dietz A; Buschermöhle M; Aarnisalo AA; Vanhanen A; Hyyrynen T; Aaltonen O; Löppönen H; Zokoll MA; Kollmeier B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 134(7):728-37. PubMed ID: 24807850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Calibration of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test].
    Holube I; Steffens T; Winkler A
    HNO; 2019 Apr; 67(4):304-305. PubMed ID: 30840090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Verification of normative values for the Swiss version of the Freiburg speech intelligibility test].
    Kompis M; Krebs M; Häusler R
    HNO; 2006 Jun; 54(6):445-50. PubMed ID: 16189713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Speech perception and cognitive abilities in seniors without subjective hearing loss].
    Weißgerber T; Müller C; Stöver T; Baumann U
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2019 Jul; 98(7):489-496. PubMed ID: 30968387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Speech audiometric outcome parameters in clinical trials on hearing improvement].
    Müller J; Plontke SK; Rahne T
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):211-218. PubMed ID: 27933349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Correlation between the APHAB questionnaire and the Freiburg monosyllabic test without + with noise].
    Löhler J; Sippel M; Walther LE; Schönweiler R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2022 Apr; 101(4):304-309. PubMed ID: 34157776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Application of new speech intelligibility tests in silence for the assessment of acquired hearing losses].
    Sukowski H; Wagener KC; Thiele C; Uppenkamp S; Kollmeier B
    HNO; 2013 Jan; 61(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 23223925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Cochlear implant for non-deaf patients?].
    Müller-Deile J; Rudert H; Brademann G; Frese K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Mar; 77(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 9577819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing: Sound Field Normative Data for BabyBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.
    Holder JT; Sheffield SW; Gifford RH
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):e50-5. PubMed ID: 26756155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Characteristics, advantages, and limits of matrix tests].
    Brand T; Wagener KC
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):182-188. PubMed ID: 27538937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech audiometry in Estonia: Estonian words in noise (EWIN) test.
    Veispak A; Jansen S; Ghesquière P; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Aug; 54(8):573-8. PubMed ID: 25812043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Hearing loss determination and assessment of the reduction in earning capacity taking speech discrimination tests in noise into account].
    Thiele C; Sukowski H; Wagener K; Kollmeier B; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
    HNO; 2011 Nov; 59(11):1111-7. PubMed ID: 21959774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of Lexical Parameters and Audibility on the Recognition of the Freiburg Monosyllabic Speech Test.
    Winkler A; Carroll R; Holube I
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):136-142. PubMed ID: 31033700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The Oldenburg children's rhyme test during speech simulating noise disturbance (Regensburg variant). Modification of the test and normal values for the ages 7-10 years].
    Steffens T
    HNO; 2003 Dec; 51(12):1012-8. PubMed ID: 14647933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can routine office-based audiometry predict cochlear implant evaluation results?
    Gubbels SP; Gartrell BC; Ploch JL; Hanson KD
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Jan; 127(1):216-222. PubMed ID: 27797418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development of materials for the clinical assessment of speech recognition: the speech sound pattern discrimination test.
    Bochner JH; Garrison WM; Sussman JE; Burkard RF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Aug; 46(4):889-900. PubMed ID: 12959467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.