These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30519744)

  • 1. Prognostic value of unifocal and multifocal positive surgical margins in a large series of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Keller EX; Bachofner J; Britschgi AJ; Saba K; Mortezavi A; Kaufmann B; Fankhauser CD; Wild P; Sulser T; Hermanns T; Eberli D; Poyet C
    World J Urol; 2019 Sep; 37(9):1837-1844. PubMed ID: 30519744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
    Sooriakumaran P; Ploumidis A; Nyberg T; Olsson M; Akre O; Haendler L; Egevad L; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Jonsson M; Adding C; Hosseini A; Steineck G; Wiklund P
    BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 24119144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
    Tuliao PH; Koo KC; Komninos C; Chang CH; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH
    BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):897-904. PubMed ID: 25098818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.
    Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Amigoni N; Shakir A; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Rizzetto R; Bernasconi R; Cerrato C; Tiso L; Migliorini F; Novella G; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):663-675. PubMed ID: 31893344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
    Sachdeva A; Veeratterapillay R; Voysey A; Kelly K; Johnson MI; Aning J; Soomro NA
    BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of Preoperative Biopsy Is a Risk Factor for Positive Surgical Margins in Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer Treated with Nerve-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Bütow Z; Schunk S; Janssen M; Gräber S; Saar M; Kamradt J; Siemer S; Stöckle M; Ohlmann CH
    Urol Int; 2015; 95(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 26575991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of a positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Yang CW; Wang HH; Hassouna MF; Chand M; Huang WJS; Chung HJ
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14329. PubMed ID: 34253832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.
    Tanimoto R; Fashola Y; Scotland KB; Calvaresi AE; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD
    BMC Urol; 2015 Apr; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25879548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality in Patients Who Underwent Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: 20 Years' Report from the EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group.
    Pellegrino F; Falagario UG; Knipper S; Martini A; Akre O; Egevad L; Aly M; Moschovas MC; Bravi CA; Tran J; Heiniger Y; von Kempis A; Schaffar R; Carrieri G; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Rochat CH; Mottrie A; Ahlering TE; John H; Patel V; Graefen M; Wiklund P;
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Aug; 7(4):888-896. PubMed ID: 38155061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy.
    Evren I; Hacıislamoğlu A; Ekşi M; Yavuzsan AH; Baytekin F; Çolakoğlu Y; Canoğlu D; Tugcu V
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 30325603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.
    Dev HS; Wiklund P; Patel V; Parashar D; Palmer K; Nyberg T; Skarecky D; Neal DE; Ahlering T; Sooriakumaran P
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e7-13. PubMed ID: 25512161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraoperative peripheral frozen sections do not significantly affect prognosis after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Gillitzer R; Thüroff C; Fandel T; Thomas C; Thüroff JW; Brenner W; Wiesner C; Jones J; Hansen T; Hampel C
    BJU Int; 2011 Mar; 107(5):755-759. PubMed ID: 20880193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Superior Biochemical Recurrence and Long-term Quality-of-life Outcomes Are Achievable with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy After a Long Learning Curve-Updated Analysis of a Prospective Single-surgeon Cohort of 2206 Consecutive Cases.
    Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Siriwardana AR; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Scheltema MJ; Stricker PD
    Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):664-671. PubMed ID: 29273404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
    Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of margin status at 37 months after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Warner JN; Nunez RN; Mmeje CO; Colby TV; Ferrigni RG; Humphreys MR; Andrews PE; Castle EP
    Can J Urol; 2011 Dec; 18(6):6043-9. PubMed ID: 22166333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating Incidence, Location, and Predictors of Positive Surgical Margin Among Chinese Men Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Qu W; Yu S; Tao J; Dong B; Fan Y; Du H; Deng H; Liu J; Zhang X
    Cancer Control; 2021; 28():10732748211055265. PubMed ID: 34794321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.
    Sivaraman A; Sanchez-Salas R; Prapotnich D; Yu K; Olivier F; Secin FP; Barret E; Galiano M; Rozet F; Cathelineau X
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e1-149.e6. PubMed ID: 28117215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.