BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30519744)

  • 1. Prognostic value of unifocal and multifocal positive surgical margins in a large series of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Keller EX; Bachofner J; Britschgi AJ; Saba K; Mortezavi A; Kaufmann B; Fankhauser CD; Wild P; Sulser T; Hermanns T; Eberli D; Poyet C
    World J Urol; 2019 Sep; 37(9):1837-1844. PubMed ID: 30519744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
    Sooriakumaran P; Ploumidis A; Nyberg T; Olsson M; Akre O; Haendler L; Egevad L; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Jonsson M; Adding C; Hosseini A; Steineck G; Wiklund P
    BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 24119144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
    Tuliao PH; Koo KC; Komninos C; Chang CH; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH
    BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):897-904. PubMed ID: 25098818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.
    Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Amigoni N; Shakir A; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Rizzetto R; Bernasconi R; Cerrato C; Tiso L; Migliorini F; Novella G; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):663-675. PubMed ID: 31893344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
    Sachdeva A; Veeratterapillay R; Voysey A; Kelly K; Johnson MI; Aning J; Soomro NA
    BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of Preoperative Biopsy Is a Risk Factor for Positive Surgical Margins in Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer Treated with Nerve-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Bütow Z; Schunk S; Janssen M; Gräber S; Saar M; Kamradt J; Siemer S; Stöckle M; Ohlmann CH
    Urol Int; 2015; 95(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 26575991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of a positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Yang CW; Wang HH; Hassouna MF; Chand M; Huang WJS; Chung HJ
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14329. PubMed ID: 34253832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.
    Tanimoto R; Fashola Y; Scotland KB; Calvaresi AE; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD
    BMC Urol; 2015 Apr; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25879548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oncologic Outcomes After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Large European Single-centre Cohort with Median 10-Year Follow-up.
    Rajan P; Hagman A; Sooriakumaran P; Nyberg T; Wallerstedt A; Adding C; Akre O; Carlsson S; Hosseini A; Olsson M; Egevad L; Wiklund F; Steineck G; Wiklund NP
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Apr; 4(3):351-359. PubMed ID: 28753802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy.
    Evren I; Hacıislamoğlu A; Ekşi M; Yavuzsan AH; Baytekin F; Çolakoğlu Y; Canoğlu D; Tugcu V
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 30325603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.
    Dev HS; Wiklund P; Patel V; Parashar D; Palmer K; Nyberg T; Skarecky D; Neal DE; Ahlering T; Sooriakumaran P
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e7-13. PubMed ID: 25512161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraoperative peripheral frozen sections do not significantly affect prognosis after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Gillitzer R; Thüroff C; Fandel T; Thomas C; Thüroff JW; Brenner W; Wiesner C; Jones J; Hansen T; Hampel C
    BJU Int; 2011 Mar; 107(5):755-759. PubMed ID: 20880193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Superior Biochemical Recurrence and Long-term Quality-of-life Outcomes Are Achievable with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy After a Long Learning Curve-Updated Analysis of a Prospective Single-surgeon Cohort of 2206 Consecutive Cases.
    Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Siriwardana AR; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Scheltema MJ; Stricker PD
    Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):664-671. PubMed ID: 29273404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
    Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of margin status at 37 months after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Warner JN; Nunez RN; Mmeje CO; Colby TV; Ferrigni RG; Humphreys MR; Andrews PE; Castle EP
    Can J Urol; 2011 Dec; 18(6):6043-9. PubMed ID: 22166333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating Incidence, Location, and Predictors of Positive Surgical Margin Among Chinese Men Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Qu W; Yu S; Tao J; Dong B; Fan Y; Du H; Deng H; Liu J; Zhang X
    Cancer Control; 2021; 28():10732748211055265. PubMed ID: 34794321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.
    Sivaraman A; Sanchez-Salas R; Prapotnich D; Yu K; Olivier F; Secin FP; Barret E; Galiano M; Rozet F; Cathelineau X
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e1-149.e6. PubMed ID: 28117215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.