302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30519744)
21. Comparison of oncological and health-related quality of life outcomes between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer - findings from the population-based Victorian Prostate Cancer Registry.
Ong WL; Evans SM; Spelman T; Kearns PA; Murphy DG; Millar JL
BJU Int; 2016 Oct; 118(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 26573954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Favorable risk factors in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Ha YS; Kang DI; Kim JH; Joung JY; Yu J; Parihar JS; Salmasi AH; Horie S; Kim WJ; Yi Kim I
Can J Urol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):7290-7. PubMed ID: 24978359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Radical prostatectomy and the effect of close surgical margins: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Herforth C; Stroup SP; Chen Z; Howard LE; Freedland SJ; Moreira DM; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Cooperberg MR; Amling CL; Kane CJ
BJU Int; 2018 Oct; 122(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 29473992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Oncologic Outcomes After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Large European Single-centre Cohort with Median 10-Year Follow-up.
Rajan P; Hagman A; Sooriakumaran P; Nyberg T; Wallerstedt A; Adding C; Akre O; Carlsson S; Hosseini A; Olsson M; Egevad L; Wiklund F; Steineck G; Wiklund NP
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Apr; 4(3):351-359. PubMed ID: 28753802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Surgical method influences specimen margins and biochemical recurrence during radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Srougi V; Bessa J; Baghdadi M; Nunes-Silva I; da Costa JB; Garcia-Barreras S; Barret E; Rozet F; Galiano M; Sanchez-Salas R; Cathelineau X
World J Urol; 2017 Oct; 35(10):1481-1488. PubMed ID: 28243789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of robot-assisted and open retropubic radical prostatectomy for risk of biochemical progression in men with positive surgical margins.
Shapiro EY; Scarberry K; Patel T; Bergman A; Ahn JJ; Sahi N; RoyChoudhury A; Deutch I; McKiernan JM; Benson MC; Badani KK
J Endourol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 24044423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Does intraoperative frozen section really predict significant positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy? A retrospective study.
Choi SY; Chi BH; Kim TH; Lim B; Lee W; You D; Kim CS
Asian J Androl; 2021; 23(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 32362599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Preoperative multiparametric MRI does not lower positive surgical margin rate in a large series of patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Gietelink L; Jansen BHE; Oprea-Lager DE; Nieuwenhuijzen JA; Vis AN
J Robot Surg; 2022 Apr; 16(2):273-278. PubMed ID: 33811618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Positive surgical margins during robotic radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of risk factors.
Liss M; Osann K; Ornstein D
BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 18435807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy.
Diaz M; Peabody JO; Kapoor V; Sammon J; Rogers CG; Stricker H; Lane Z; Gupta N; Bhandari M; Menon M
Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1168-1176. PubMed ID: 24996687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Trends in risk-group distribution and Pentafecta outcomes in patients treated with nerve-sparing, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a 10-year low-intermediate volume single-center experience.
Afferi L; Moschini M; Baumeister P; Zamboni S; Cornelius J; Ineichen G; Mattei A; Mordasini L
World J Urol; 2021 Feb; 39(2):389-397. PubMed ID: 32328779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of positive surgical margin status in predicting early biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Morizane S; Yumioka T; Makishima K; Tsounapi P; Iwamoto H; Hikita K; Honda M; Umekita Y; Takenaka A
Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Oct; 26(10):1961-1967. PubMed ID: 34313905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Intraoperative frozen section monitoring during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of partial secondary resection of neurovascular bundles and its effect on oncologic and functional outcome.
Hatzichristodoulou G; Wagenpfeil S; Weirich G; Autenrieth M; Maurer T; Thalgott M; Horn T; Heck M; Herkommer K; Gschwend JE; Kübler H
World J Urol; 2016 Feb; 34(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 26100945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The impact of the extent and location of positive surgical margins on the risk of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancers.
Matti B; Reeves F; Prouse M; Zargar-Shoshtari K
Prostate; 2021 Dec; 81(16):1428-1434. PubMed ID: 34570379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Robotic radical prostatectomy: analysis of midterm pathologic and oncologic outcomes: A historical series from a high-volume center.
Asimakopoulos AD; Annino F; Mugnier C; Lopez L; Hoepffner JL; Gaston R; Piechaud T
Surg Endosc; 2021 Dec; 35(12):6731-6745. PubMed ID: 33289056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of positive surgical margin location and perineural invasion on biochemical recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Lian Z; Zhang H; He Z; Ma S; Wang X; Liu R
World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Aug; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 32791998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Chapin BF; Nguyen JN; Achim MF; Navai N; Williams SB; Prokhorova IN; Wang X; Tapia EMLN; Davis JW; Troncoso P
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 29230008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Positive Association between Preoperative Total Testosterone Levels and Risk of Positive Surgical Margins by Prostate Cancer: Results in 476 Consecutive Patients Treated Only by Radical Prostatectomy.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Corsi P; Pocessali T; Pirozzi M; Amigoni N; Rizzetto R; Mariotto A; Inverardi D; Brunelli M; Iacovelli R; Romano M; Siracusano S; Artibani W
Urol Int; 2018; 101(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 29975957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence following radical perineal prostatectomy in a large contemporary series: a detailed assessment of margin extent and location.
Sammon JD; Trinh QD; Sukumar S; Ravi P; Friedman A; Sun M; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Jeong W; Mander N; Peabody JO; Karakiewicz PI; Harris M
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1470-6. PubMed ID: 22534086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Positive surgical margin in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: correlation with pathology findings and risk of biochemical recurrence.
Jo JK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Zargar H; Autorino R; Lee SE
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Oct; 69(5):493-500. PubMed ID: 28376606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
