162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30519750)
1. Cesarean section scar in 3 T magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound: image characteristics and comparison of the methods.
Hoffmann J; Exner M; Bremicker K; Grothoff M; Stumpp P; Schrey-Petersen S; Stepan H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Feb; 299(2):439-449. PubMed ID: 30519750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the lower uterine segment in pregnant women with and without previous cesarean section in 3 T MRI.
Hoffmann J; Exner M; Bremicker K; Grothoff M; Stumpp P; Stepan H
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 May; 19(1):160. PubMed ID: 31068180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variables influencing the integrity of lower uterine segment in post-cesarean pregnancy.
Brahmalakshmy BL; Kushtagi P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Apr; 291(4):755-62. PubMed ID: 25209351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Lower Uterine Segment Trial: A pragmatic open multicenter randomized trial].
Rozenberg P; Deruelle P; Sénat MV; Desbrière R; Winer N; Simon E; Ville Y; Kayem G; Boutron I;
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 Apr; 46(4):427-432. PubMed ID: 29625873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. First and Third Trimester Uterine Scar Thickness in Women With Previous Caesarean: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Paquette K; Markey S; Roberge S; Girard M; Bujold E; Demers S
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Jan; 41(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 30316720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Correlation between uterine scar condition and uterine rupture for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section].
Wang LL; Chen JY; Yang HX; Fan LX; Zhang XX; Jing BH; Huang RN; Li C
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):375-380. PubMed ID: 31262121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasound elastography of the lower uterine segment in women with a previous cesarean section: Comparison of in-/ex-vivo elastography versus tensile-stress-strain-rupture analysis.
Seliger G; Chaoui K; Lautenschläger C; Jenderka KV; Kunze C; Hiller GGR; Tchirikov M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Jun; 225():172-180. PubMed ID: 29729520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utility of multiparametric MRI in Caesarean section scar characterization and preoperative prediction of scar dehiscence: a prospective study.
Kumar I; Verma A; Matah M; Satpathy G
Acta Radiol; 2017 Jul; 58(7):890-896. PubMed ID: 27799572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sonographic assessment of the lower uterine segment during active labor in women with or without a uterine scar - a prospective study.
Barzilay E; Shay A; Lahav-Ezra H; Shina A; Perlman S; Achiron R; Gilboa Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Jul; 31(14):1885-1888. PubMed ID: 28511577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness at term in women with previous cesarean delivery.
Uharček P; Brešťanský A; Ravinger J; Máňová A; Zajacová M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Sep; 292(3):609-12. PubMed ID: 25814295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lower uterine segment thickness measurement in pregnant women with previous Cesarean section: reliability analysis using two- and three-dimensional transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound.
Martins WP; Barra DA; Gallarreta FM; Nastri CO; Filho FM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 19148891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transvaginal Sonographic Evaluation of Cesarean Section Scar Niche in Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Paskauskas S; Ramoniene G; Nadisauskiene RJ
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Oct; 57(10):. PubMed ID: 34684128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis.
Kok N; Wiersma IC; Opmeer BC; de Graaf IM; Mol BW; Pajkrt E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 42(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 23576473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pilot study of MRI/ultrasound fusion imaging in postpartum assessment of Cesarean section scar.
Bolten K; Fischer T; Bender YY; Diederichs G; Thomas A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 50(4):520-526. PubMed ID: 27804175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review.
Jastrow N; Chaillet N; Roberge S; Morency AM; Lacasse Y; Bujold E
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):321-327. PubMed ID: 20500938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cesarean Scar Thickness Decreases during Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Kliucinskas M; Paskauskas S
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Mar; 58(3):. PubMed ID: 35334583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with a single previous Cesarean section.
Sanlorenzo O; Farina A; Pula G; Zanello M; Pedrazzi A; Martina T; Gabrielli S; Simonazzi G; Rizzo N
Minerva Ginecol; 2013 Oct; 65(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 24096291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative study of the lower uterine segment after Cesarean section using ultrasound and magnetic resonance tomography].
Hebisch G; Kirkinen P; Haldemann R; Pääkköö E; Huch A; Huch R
Ultraschall Med; 1994 Jun; 15(3):112-6. PubMed ID: 8091195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment at term in women with previous cesarean delivery.
Kushtagi P; Garepalli S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Mar; 283(3):455-9. PubMed ID: 20145938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technique of sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment in women with previous cesarean delivery: a prospective, pre/intraoperative comparative ultrasound study.
Seliger G; Chaoui K; Lautenschläger C; Riemer M; Tchirikov M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Aug; 298(2):297-306. PubMed ID: 29948165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
