These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30520153)

  • 1. The dilemma of pest suppression in the conservation of endangered species.
    Adler PH; Barzen J; Gray E; Lacy A; Urbanek RP; Converse SJ
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Aug; 33(4):788-796. PubMed ID: 30520153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and evaluation of methods to assess populations of black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) at nests of the endangered whooping crane (Grus americana).
    King RS; Adler PH
    J Vector Ecol; 2012 Dec; 37(2):298-306. PubMed ID: 23181852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Whooping crane use of riverine stopover sites.
    Baasch DM; Farrell PD; Howlin S; Pearse AT; Farnsworth JM; Smith CB
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209612. PubMed ID: 30625185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting and mapping potential Whooping Crane stopover habitat to guide site selection for wind energy projects.
    Belaire JA; Kreakie BJ; Keitt T; Minor E
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):541-50. PubMed ID: 24372936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Demography of a reintroduced population: moving toward management models for an endangered species, the Whooping Crane.
    Servanty S; Converse SJ; Bailey LL
    Ecol Appl; 2014 Jul; 24(5):927-37. PubMed ID: 25154087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Migrating Whooping Cranes avoid wind-energy infrastructure when selecting stopover habitat.
    Pearse AT; Metzger KL; Brandt DA; Shaffer JA; Bidwell MT; Harrell W
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Jul; 31(5):e02324. PubMed ID: 33682273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of opportunistic sightings and expert knowledge to predict and compare Whooping Crane stopover habitat.
    Hefley TJ; Baasch DM; Tyre AJ; Blankenship EE
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1337-46. PubMed ID: 25926004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Haemosporida prevalence and diversity are similar in endangered wild whooping cranes (Grus americana) and sympatric sandhill cranes (Grus canadensis).
    Bertram MR; Hamer GL; Hartup BK; Snowden KF; Medeiros MC; Hamer SA
    Parasitology; 2017 Apr; 144(5):629-640. PubMed ID: 27938437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coccidian Parasites and Conservation Implications for the Endangered Whooping Crane (Grus americana).
    Bertram MR; Hamer GL; Snowden KF; Hartup BK; Hamer SA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0127679. PubMed ID: 26061631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reintroduction medicine: whooping cranes in Wisconsin.
    Keller DL; Hartup BK
    Zoo Biol; 2013; 32(6):600-7. PubMed ID: 24027128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive management of animal populations with significant unknowns and uncertainties: a case study.
    Gerber BD; Kendall WL
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Jul; 28(5):1325-1341. PubMed ID: 29696712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A hierarchical nest survival model integrating incomplete temporally varying covariates.
    Converse SJ; Royle JA; Adler PH; Urbanek RP; Barzen JA
    Ecol Evol; 2013 Nov; 3(13):4439-47. PubMed ID: 24340185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of fecal glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations in hand- versus parent-reared whooping cranes (Grus americana).
    Brown ME; Torkelson MR; Olsen GH; Krisp A; Hartup BK
    Zoo Biol; 2020 Jul; 39(4):276-280. PubMed ID: 32270553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Double jeopardy: global change and interspecies competition threaten Siberian cranes.
    Gao L; Mi C
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17029. PubMed ID: 38436031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Planning for ex situ conservation in the face of uncertainty.
    Canessa S; Converse SJ; West M; Clemann N; Gillespie G; McFadden M; Silla AJ; Parris KM; McCarthy MA
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Jun; 30(3):599-609. PubMed ID: 26306549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of potential responses to invasive non-native species with structured decision making.
    Liu S; Walshe T; Long G; Cook D
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Jun; 26(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 22519636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structuring decisions for managing threatened and endangered species in a changing climate.
    Gregory R; Arvai J; Gerber LR
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1212-21. PubMed ID: 24299087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blood Mercury in Three Populations of Endangered Whooping Crane (Grus americana).
    Hartup BK; Smith P; Warner SE; McPhee ME
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2021 Nov; 107(5):809-813. PubMed ID: 34232328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the enteric microflora of captive whooping cranes (Grus americana) and sandhill cranes (Grus canadensis).
    Hoar BM; Whiteside DP; Ward L; Douglas Inglis G; Morck DW
    Zoo Biol; 2007 Mar; 26(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 19360567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diet Shift and Its Impact on Foraging Behavior of Siberian Crane (Grus Leucogeranus) in Poyang Lake.
    Jia Y; Jiao S; Zhang Y; Zhou Y; Lei G; Liu G
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e65843. PubMed ID: 23823943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.