285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30520819)
1. MDM2 RNA In Situ Hybridization for the Diagnosis of Atypical Lipomatous Tumor: A Study Evaluating DNA, RNA, and Protein Expression.
Kulkarni AS; Wojcik JB; Chougule A; Arora K; Chittampalli Y; Kurzawa P; Mullen JT; Chebib I; Nielsen GP; Rivera MN; Ting DT; Deshpande V
Am J Surg Pathol; 2019 Apr; 43(4):446-454. PubMed ID: 30520819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Diagnostic value of MDM2 RNA in situ hybridization in atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma].
Chen C; He X; Jing WY; Qiu Y; Chen M; Luo TY; Liu XY; Chen HJ; Zhang HY; Bu H
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Mar; 51(3):190-195. PubMed ID: 35249280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Dysplastic lipoma: potential diagnostic pitfall of using MDM2 RNA in situ hybridization to distinguish between lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor.
Hung YP; Michal M; Dubuc AM; Rosenberg AE; Nielsen GP
Hum Pathol; 2020 Jul; 101():53-57. PubMed ID: 32439322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic utility of p16, CDK4, and MDM2 as an immunohistochemical panel in distinguishing well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas from other adipocytic tumors.
Thway K; Flora R; Shah C; Olmos D; Fisher C
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Mar; 36(3):462-9. PubMed ID: 22301498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Expression of FRS2 in atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma: an immunohistochemical analysis of 182 cases with genetic data.
Jing W; Lan T; Qiu Y; Peng R; Lu Y; Chen H; Chen M; He X; Chen C; Zhang H
Diagn Pathol; 2021 Oct; 16(1):96. PubMed ID: 34696768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Atypical lipomatous tumor/well differentiated liposarcoma and related mimics with updates. When is molecular testing most cost-effective, necessary, and indicated?
Kilpatrick SE
Hum Pathol; 2024 May; 147():82-91. PubMed ID: 38135062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The value of MDM2 and CDK4 amplification levels using real-time polymerase chain reaction for the differential diagnosis of liposarcomas and their histologic mimickers.
Shimada S; Ishizawa T; Ishizawa K; Matsumura T; Hasegawa T; Hirose T
Hum Pathol; 2006 Sep; 37(9):1123-9. PubMed ID: 16938516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MDM2 and CDK4 Immunohistochemistry: Should It Be Used in Problematic Differentiated Lipomatous Tumors?: A New Perspective.
Clay MR; Martinez AP; Weiss SW; Edgar MA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Dec; 40(12):1647-1652. PubMed ID: 27508976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect MDM2 amplification in liposarcomas and their morphological mimics.
Kimura H; Dobashi Y; Nojima T; Nakamura H; Yamamoto N; Tsuchiya H; Ikeda H; Sawada-Kitamura S; Oyama T; Ooi A
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2013; 6(7):1306-16. PubMed ID: 23826411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lessons learnt from MDM2 fluorescence in-situ hybridisation analysis of 439 mature lipomatous lesions with an emphasis on atypical lipomatous tumour/well-differentiated liposarcoma lacking cytological atypia.
Vargas AC; Joy C; Cheah AL; Jones M; Bonar F; Brookwell R; Garrone B; Talbot J; Harraway J; Gill AJ; Maclean FM
Histopathology; 2022 Jan; 80(2):369-380. PubMed ID: 34523152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MDM2 Amplification in Problematic Lipomatous Tumors: Analysis of FISH Testing Criteria.
Clay MR; Martinez AP; Weiss SW; Edgar MA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2015 Oct; 39(10):1433-9. PubMed ID: 26146760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Amplification of FRS2 in atypical lipomatous tumour/well-differentiated liposarcoma and de-differentiated liposarcoma: a clinicopathological and genetic study of 146 cases.
Jing W; Lan T; Chen H; Zhang Z; Chen M; Peng R; He X; Zhang H
Histopathology; 2018 Jun; 72(7):1145-1155. PubMed ID: 29368794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Expression of MDM2 and p16 in angiomyolipoma.
Lin X; Laskin WB; Lu X; Zhang Y
Hum Pathol; 2018 May; 75():34-40. PubMed ID: 29432785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atypical Lipomatous Tumor/Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma With Features Mimicking Spindle Cell Lipoma.
Jebastin JAS; Perry KD; Chitale DA; Mott MP; Sanchez J; Fritchie KJ; Palanisamy N; Williamson SR
Int J Surg Pathol; 2020 May; 28(3):336-340. PubMed ID: 31672072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Utility Of Fish For MDM2 In Adipocytic Neoplasms.
Sarwar S; Mushtaq S; Hassan U; Maqbool H; Qazi R
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2021; 33(4):563-567. PubMed ID: 35124908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential diagnosis of atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma: utility of p16 in combination with MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry.
Kammerer-Jacquet SF; Thierry S; Cabillic F; Lannes M; Burtin F; Henno S; Dugay F; Bouzillé G; Rioux-Leclercq N; Belaud-Rotureau MA; Stock N
Hum Pathol; 2017 Jan; 59():34-40. PubMed ID: 27597521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity of MDM2 amplification and unexpected multiple faint alphoid 12 (alpha 12 satellite sequences) signals in atypical lipomatous tumor.
Kashima T; Halai D; Ye H; Hing SN; Delaney D; Pollock R; O'Donnell P; Tirabosco R; Flanagan AM
Mod Pathol; 2012 Oct; 25(10):1384-96. PubMed ID: 22699518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CD10 (neprilysin) expression: a potential adjunct in the distinction of hibernoma from morphologic mimics.
Gjorgova-Gjeorgjievski S; Fritchie K; Folpe AL
Hum Pathol; 2021 Apr; 110():12-19. PubMed ID: 33406387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Molecular testing for lipomatous tumors: critical analysis and test recommendations based on the analysis of 405 extremity-based tumors.
Zhang H; Erickson-Johnson M; Wang X; Oliveira JL; Nascimento AG; Sim FH; Wenger DE; Zamolyi RQ; Pannain VL; Oliveira AM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1304-11. PubMed ID: 20679883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differentiating atypical lipomatous tumors from lipomas with magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison with MDM2 gene amplification status.
Knebel C; Neumann J; Schwaiger BJ; Karampinos DC; Pfeiffer D; Specht K; Lenze U; von Eisenhart-Rothe R; Rummeny EJ; Woertler K; Gersing AS
BMC Cancer; 2019 Apr; 19(1):309. PubMed ID: 30943944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
