472 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30521070)
1. Mechanical behavior of posterior all-ceramic hybrid-abutment-crowns versus hybrid-abutments with separate crowns-A laboratory study.
Nouh I; Kern M; Sabet AE; Aboelfadl AK; Hamdy AM; Chaar MS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jan; 30(1):90-98. PubMed ID: 30521070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.
Elsayed A; Wille S; Al-Akhali M; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 28664585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture Resistance of Titanium-Based Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Implant Restorations.
Roberts EE; Bailey CW; Ashcraft-Olmscheid DL; Vandewalle KS
J Prosthodont; 2018 Aug; 27(7):644-650. PubMed ID: 29417647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of zirconia abutment preparation on the fracture strength of single implant lithium disilicate crowns after chewing simulation.
Mitsias M; Koutayas SO; Wolfart S; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):675-82. PubMed ID: 23106096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns.
Pitta J; Hicklin SP; Fehmer V; Boldt J; Gierthmuehlen PC; Sailer I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1091–1097. PubMed ID: 30934031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue.
Spitznagel FA; Bonfante EA; Vollmer F; Gierthmuehlen PC
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):136-146. PubMed ID: 33870577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical stability and technical outcomes of monolithic CAD/CAM fabricated abutment-crowns supported by titanium bases: An in vitro study.
Pitta J; Hjerppe J; Burkhardt F; Fehmer V; Mojon P; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Feb; 32(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 33258267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical behavior of nano-hybrid composite in comparison to lithium disilicate as posterior cement-retained implant-supported crowns restoring different abutments.
Elsayed A; Yazigi C; Kern M; Chaar MS
Dent Mater; 2021 Aug; 37(8):e435-e442. PubMed ID: 33875247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging.
Atsü SS; Aksan ME; Bulut AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):622–630. PubMed ID: 30716141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.
Martínez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical Fatigue Analysis of PEEK as Alternative to Zirconia for Definitive Hybrid Abutments Supporting All-Ceramic Crowns.
Barbosa-Júnior SA; Pereira GKR; Dapieve KS; Machado PS; Valandro LF; Schuh C; Consani RLX; Bacchi A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(6):1209-1217. PubMed ID: 33270062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of fatigue loading and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments.
Cárdenas R; Sánchez D; Euán R; Flores AM
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):875-881. PubMed ID: 33483141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
Sghaireen MG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 24118925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retention of hybrid-abutment-crowns with offset implant placement: influence of Crown materials and Ti-base height.
Alseddiek A; Al-Zordk W; Attia A
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):784. PubMed ID: 37875871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro performance of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns: Influence of patient-specific tooth-coloured abutments with titanium adhesive bases.
Rosentritt M; Rembs A; Behr M; Hahnel S; Preis V
J Dent; 2015 Jul; 43(7):839-45. PubMed ID: 25953721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture Resistance of Custom Lithium Disilicate Implant Restorations with Two Fabrication Techniques and Two Designs.
Emam M; Eldimeery A; Salah T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):677-684. PubMed ID: 35904823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of preparation mode and depth on the fracture strength of zirconia ceramic abutments restored with lithium disilicate crowns.
Koutayas SO; Mitsias M; Wolfart S; Kern M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(4):839-48. PubMed ID: 22848886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments.
Akan E; Velioğlu E; Çömlekoğlu ME; Çömlekoğlu MD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 35727245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface.
Hjerppe J; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104121. PubMed ID: 35395344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
