129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30521172)
1. The importance of histopathologic review of biopsies in patients with prostate cancer referred to a tertiary uro-oncology center.
Matheus WE; Ferreira U; Brandão EA; Ferruccio AA; Billis A
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):32-37. PubMed ID: 30521172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathological Concordance between Prostate Biopsies and Radical Prostatectomy Using Transperineal Sector Mapping Biopsies: Validation and Comparison with Transrectal Biopsies.
Marra G; Eldred-Evans D; Challacombe B; Van Hemelrijck M; Polson A; Pomplun S; Foster CS; Brown C; Cahill D; Gontero P; Popert R; Muir G
Urol Int; 2017; 99(2):168-176. PubMed ID: 28768264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of second-opinion pathology diagnoses on prostate biopsies from patients referred for management of prostate cancer.
Barqawi AB; Turcanu R; Gamito EJ; Lucia SM; O'Donnell CI; Crawford ED; La Rosa DD; La Rosa FG
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2011 Jun; 4(5):468-75. PubMed ID: 21738818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revised Gleason grading system is a better predictor of indolent prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis: retrospective clinical-pathological study on matched biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Giunchi F; Brunocilla E; Borghesi M; Rizzi S; Ricci MS; Romagnoli D; Martorana G; Schiavina R; Fiorentino M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Oct; 12(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 24583160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate with lymph node metastases: analysis of 184 radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kryvenko ON; Gupta NS; Virani N; Schultz D; Gomez J; Amin A; Lane Z; Epstein JI
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 May; 137(5):610-7. PubMed ID: 23627451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Downgrading of biopsy based Gleason score in prostatectomy specimens.
Treurniet KM; Trudel D; Sykes J; Evans AJ; Finelli A; Van der Kwast TH
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 24403214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interobserver variability in the pathological assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens: findings of the Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open (LAPPRO) study.
Persson J; Wilderäng U; Jiborn T; Wiklund PN; Damber JE; Hugosson J; Steineck G; Haglind E; Bjartell A
Scand J Urol; 2014 Apr; 48(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 23906418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiparametric-Magnetic Resonance/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Improves Agreement Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score.
Porpiglia F; DE Luca S; Passera R; Manfredi M; Mele F; Bollito E; DE Pascale A; Cossu M; Aimar R; Veltri A
Anticancer Res; 2016 Sep; 36(9):4833-9. PubMed ID: 27630337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How significant is upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology while discussing less invasive treatment options?
Suer E; Gokce MI; Gulpinar O; Guclu AG; Haciyev P; Gogus C; Turkolmez K; Baltaci S
Scand J Urol; 2014 Apr; 48(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 23941315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer.
Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):907-912. PubMed ID: 27876305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Localized prostate cancer and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective, comparative study between pre- and post-operative Gleason scores.
Henderickx MMEL; Brits T; Muilwijk T; Adams T; Vandeursen H
Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb; 118(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 28720050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gleason grading challenges in the diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma: experience of a single institution.
Chen SD; Fava JL; Amin A
Virchows Arch; 2016 Feb; 468(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 26563400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation of Preoperative and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score: Examining the Predictors of Upgrade and Downgrade Results.
Pourmand G; Gooran S; Hossieni SR; Guitynavard F; Safavi M; Sharifi A; Mokhtari E
Acta Med Iran; 2017 Apr; 55(4):249-253. PubMed ID: 28532136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate cancer after initial high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and benign prostate biopsy.
Patel P; Nayak JG; Biljetina Z; Donnelly B; Trpkov K
Can J Urol; 2015 Dec; 22(6):8056-62. PubMed ID: 26688133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate cancer grading: the effect of stratification of needle biopsy Gleason Score 4 + 3 as high or intermediate grade.
Fanning DM; Kay E; Fan Y; Fitzpatrick JM; Watson RW
BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(5):631-5. PubMed ID: 19732053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Change in the risk stratification of prostate cancer after Slide Review by a uropathologist: the experience of a reference center for the treatment of prostate cancer.
Camara-Lopes G; Marta GN; Leite ET; Siqueira GS; Hanna SA; Silva JL; Camara-Lopes LH; Leite KR
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(4):454-9; discussion 460-2. PubMed ID: 25251950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Agreement of Gleason score on prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: is there improvement with increased number of biopsy cylinders and the 2005 revised Gleason scoring?
Van Praet C; Libbrecht L; D'Hondt F; Decaestecker K; Fonteyne V; Verschuere S; Rottey S; Praet M; De Visschere P; Lumen N;
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Jun; 12(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 24361055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gleason score and laterality concordance between prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimens.
Nepple KG; Wahls TL; Hillis SL; Joudi FN
Int Braz J Urol; 2009; 35(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 19860934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Concordance of Gleason grading with three-dimensional ultrasound systematic biopsy and biopsy core pre-embedding.
van der Aa AAMA; Mannaerts CK; van der Linden H; Gayet M; Schrier BP; Mischi M; Beerlage HP; Wijkstra H
World J Urol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):863-869. PubMed ID: 29392409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
