BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30521172)

  • 21. Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.
    Huang CC; Kong MX; Zhou M; Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS; Melamed J; Deng FM
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24832163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prostate needle biopsies: interobserver variation and clinical consequences of histopathological re-evaluation.
    Berg KD; Toft BG; Røder MA; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
    APMIS; 2011 Apr; 119(4-5):239-46. PubMed ID: 21492223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Clinically predictive factors of Gleason score upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy].
    Zuo Q; Zhang F; Huang Y; Ma LL; Lu M; Lu J
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Aug; 48(4):603-606. PubMed ID: 29263497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Concordance between Gleason scores of trans rectal biopsies and the surgical piece of radical prostatectomy].
    Tapia O; Bellolio E; Roa JC; Guzmán P; Villaseca M; Araya JC
    Rev Med Chil; 2011 Feb; 139(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 21773653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The New Prostate Cancer Grading System Does Not Improve Prediction of Clinical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Large, Two-Center Validation Study.
    Dell'Oglio P; Karnes RJ; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Stabile A; Moschini M; Cucchiara V; Zaffuto E; Karakiewicz PI; Suardi N; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Prostate; 2017 Feb; 77(3):263-273. PubMed ID: 27753114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of Gleason pattern up gradation after radical prostatectomy for carcinoma prostate patients with low biopsy score (≤ 6).
    Kulkarni JN; Valsangkar RS; Jadhav YR; Singh DP
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2011; 7(4):459-62. PubMed ID: 22269410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen Gleason score in internal and external pathology facilities.
    Grasso AA; Cozzi G; Palumbo C; Albo G; Rocco B
    Anticancer Res; 2014 Oct; 34(10):5585-8. PubMed ID: 25275059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Gleason score concordance on biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer: is pathological re-evaluation necessary prior to radical prostatectomy?
    Truesdale MD; Cheetham PJ; Turk AT; Sartori S; Hruby GW; Dinneen EP; Benson MC; Badani KK
    BJU Int; 2011 Mar; 107(5):749-754. PubMed ID: 20840549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Single small focus of prostate adenocarcinoma (< or = 1 mm and too small for grading) and clinical significant disease after radical prostatectomy.
    Taverna G; Colombo P; Seveso M; Giusti G; Piccinelli A; Benetti A; Graziotti P
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2006 Jun; 78(2):57-60. PubMed ID: 16929604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Primary Gleason pattern in biopsy Gleason score 7 is predictive of adverse histopathological features and biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy.
    Berg KD; Røder MA; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
    Scand J Urol; 2014 Apr; 48(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 23889119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Concordance of the Gleason score in prostate multibiopsy and definitive histology].
    May M; Brookman-May S; Lebentrau S; Gilfrich C; Loy V; Theissig F; Roigas J; Hoschke B; Burger M; Miller K
    Aktuelle Urol; 2010 May; 41(3):184-92. PubMed ID: 20309804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Trends in Gleason score: concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy over 15 years.
    Rajinikanth A; Manoharan M; Soloway CT; Civantos FJ; Soloway MS
    Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 18279938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Is active surveillance a safe alternative in the management of localized prostate cancer? Pathological features of radical prostatectomy specimens in potential candidates for active surveillance.
    Norman Z; Militza P; Andres F; Daniela F; Alejandro M; Catherine S; Juan F
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 24856482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
    BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
    Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
    Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The quantitative Gleason score improves prostate cancer risk assessment.
    Reese AC; Cowan JE; Brajtbord JS; Harris CR; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
    Cancer; 2012 Dec; 118(24):6046-54. PubMed ID: 22674220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer.
    Moussa AS; Li J; Soriano M; Klein EA; Dong F; Jones JS
    BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18782303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Implications of greater short-term PSA recurrence with laparoscopic as compared to retropubic radical prostatectomy for Japanese clinically localized prostate carcinomas.
    Akita H; Okamura T; Ando R; Nagata D; Naruyama H; Yamada Y; Naiki T; Yasui T; Tozawa K; Kohri K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(11):2959-61. PubMed ID: 22393971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Histopathologic review of prostate biopsies from patients referred to a comprehensive cancer center: correlation of pathologic findings, analysis of cost, and impact on treatment.
    Wurzer JC; Al-Saleem TI; Hanlon AL; Freedman GM; Patchefsky A; Hanks GE
    Cancer; 1998 Aug; 83(4):753-9. PubMed ID: 9708941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of age on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Ozden C; Aktas BK; Bulut S; Erbay G; Tagci S; Gokkaya CS; Baykam MM; Memis A
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 33(2):91-95. PubMed ID: 28137417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.