These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30521404)

  • 1. Techniques for improving ophthalmic studies performed on administrative databases.
    Borkar DS; Sobrin L; Hubbard RA; Kempen JH; VanderBeek BL
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 26(3):147-149. PubMed ID: 30521404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Designing a research study.
    Smith CJ
    Phlebology; 2011 Dec; 26(8):369-70. PubMed ID: 22130807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Epidemiologic research using administrative databases: garbage in, garbage out.
    Grimes DA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Nov; 116(5):1018-9. PubMed ID: 20966682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Epidemiologic research using administrative databases: garbage in, garbage out.
    Lidegaard Ø
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Feb; 117(2 Pt 1):410-411. PubMed ID: 21252770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. French Medical-Administrative Database for Epidemiology and Safety in Ophthalmology (EPISAFE): The EPISAFE Collaboration Program in Cataract Surgery.
    Daien V; Korobelnik JF; Delcourt C; Cougnard-Gregoire A; Delyfer MN; Bron AM; Carrière I; Villain M; Daures JP; Lacombe S; Mariet AS; Quantin C; Creuzot-Garcher C
    Ophthalmic Res; 2017; 58(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 28376478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Epidemiologic research using administrative databases: garbage in, garbage out.
    Hoover KW; Tao G; Kent CK; Aral SO
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):729. PubMed ID: 21343778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Big data and ophthalmic research.
    Clark A; Ng JQ; Morlet N; Semmens JB
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2016; 61(4):443-65. PubMed ID: 26844660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The importance of validation in ophthalmic medical claims database research.
    Forooghian F
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 52(2):143-144. PubMed ID: 28457280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of administrative medical databases in population-based research.
    Gavrielov-Yusim N; Friger M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2014 Mar; 68(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 24248997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Explosion of ophthalmic collaborative research networks in Australia.
    Hewitt AW; Yazar S; Franchina M
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Apr; 41(3):310-1. PubMed ID: 22957512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Emphasis on the application of precision medicine in ophthalmology].
    Sun XD; Zhu H
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 52(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 26906701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Data sharing.
    Hutchinson JA
    Transplantation; 2015 Apr; 99(4):649-50. PubMed ID: 25769068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How Will Big Data Improve Clinical and Basic Research in Radiation Therapy?
    Rosenstein BS; Capala J; Efstathiou JA; Hammerbacher J; Kerns SL; Kong FS; Ostrer H; Prior FW; Vikram B; Wong J; Xiao Y
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Jul; 95(3):895-904. PubMed ID: 26797542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological issues in observational studies and non-randomized controlled trials in oncology in the era of big data.
    Tanaka S; Tanaka S; Kawakami K
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 25589456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Promoting Data Harmonization of COVID-19 Research in Pregnant and Pediatric Populations.
    Gleason JL; Tamburro R; Signore C
    JAMA; 2023 Aug; 330(6):497-498. PubMed ID: 37471096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving practice: establishing processes to query clinical data warehouses.
    Brokel JM
    Urol Nurs; 2009; 29(5):301-2. PubMed ID: 19863036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Routine health insurance data for scientific research: potential and limitations of the Agis Health Database.
    Smeets HM; de Wit NJ; Hoes AW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):424-30. PubMed ID: 20800994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can administrative data be used to compare the quality of health care?
    Romano PS
    Med Care Rev; 1993; 50(4):451-77. PubMed ID: 10131116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [State of play of French data collections in the field of rare diseases].
    Aymé S
    Med Sci (Paris); 2018 May; 34 Hors série n°1():22-25. PubMed ID: 29911549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Harmonization of Databases: A Step for Advancing the Knowledge About Spinal Cord Injury.
    Charlifue S; Tate D; Biering-Sorensen F; Burns S; Chen Y; Chun S; Jakeman LB; Kowalski RG; Noonan VK; Ullrich P
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Oct; 97(10):1805-18. PubMed ID: 27137095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.