139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30522275)
21. Predicting Intelligibility Gains in Dysarthria Through Automated Speech Feature Analysis.
Fletcher AR; Wisler AA; McAuliffe MJ; Lansford KL; Liss JM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 60(11):3058-3068. PubMed ID: 29075755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Acoustic and intelligibility characteristics of sentence production in neurogenic speech disorders.
Weismer G; Jeng JY; Laures JS; Kent RD; Kent JF
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2001; 53(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 11125256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cleft lip and palate patients prior to delayed closure of the hard palate: evaluation of maxillary morphology and the effect of early stimulation on pre-school speech.
Lohmander-Agerskov A; Söderpalm E; Friede H; Lilja J
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 1990; 24(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 2237312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The relationship between early reading skills and speech and language performance in young children with cleft lip and palate.
Chapman KL
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 May; 48(3):301-11. PubMed ID: 20815721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Speech development in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with different delays in closure of the hard palate after early velar repair: a longitudinal perspective.
Lohmander A; Friede H; Elander A; Persson C; Lilja J
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 2006; 40(5):267-74. PubMed ID: 17065115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Automatically evaluated degree of intelligibility of children with different cleft type from preschool and elementary school measured by automatic speech recognition.
Schuster M; Maier A; Bocklet T; Nkenke E; Holst A; Eysholdt U; Stelzle F
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Mar; 76(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 22236457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Articulatory-acoustic vowel space: Associations between acoustic and perceptual measures of clear speech.
Whitfield JA; Goberman AM
Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2017 Apr; 19(2):184-194. PubMed ID: 27328115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Speech segment durations produced by five and six year old speakers with and without cleft palates.
Forner LL
Cleft Palate J; 1983 Jul; 20(3):185-98. PubMed ID: 6577982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Patterns of articulation abilities in speakers with cleft palate.
Van Demark DR; Morris HL; Vandehaar C
Cleft Palate J; 1979 Jul; 16(3):230-9. PubMed ID: 287573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Orofacial Function, Articulation Proficiency, and Intelligibility in 5-Year-Old Children Born With Cleft Lip and Palate.
Malmenholt A; McAllister A; Lohmander A
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Mar; 56(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 29906219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Spectral, cepstral, and multivariate exploration of tracheoesophageal voice quality in continuous speech and sustained vowels.
Maryn Y; Dick C; Vandenbruaene C; Vauterin T; Jacobs T
Laryngoscope; 2009 Dec; 119(12):2384-94. PubMed ID: 19718753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of speech disorders in children with cleft lip and palate.
Paal S; Reulbach U; Strobel-Schwarthoff K; Nkenke E; Schuster M
J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Jul; 66(4):270-8. PubMed ID: 16044225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Temporal characteristics of nasalization in Persian speaker children with and without cleft palate.
Baghban K; Torabinezhad F; Moradi N; Asadollahpour F; Ahmadi N; Mardani N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Apr; 79(4):546-52. PubMed ID: 25700957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Speech in Adult Patients with Unrepaired Cleft Palate.
Lou Q; Wang X; Jiang L; Wang G; Chen Y; Liu Q
J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 33(5):e528-e532. PubMed ID: 35175986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Intelligibility measurements in speech disorders: a critical review of the literature.
Barreto Sdos S; Ortiz KZ
Pro Fono; 2008; 20(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 18852969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Examination of the standard deviation of mean nasalance scores in subjects with cleft palate: implications for clinical use.
Vallino-Napoli LD; Montgomery AA
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 9431469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Residual clefts in the hard palate: correlation between cleft size and speech.
Lohmander-Agerskov A; Friede H; Söderpalm E; Lilja J
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 9138506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Articulatory dimensions of hearing-impaired speakers' intelligibility: evidence from a time-related aerodynamic, acoustic, and electroglottographic study.
Samar VJ; Metz DE; Schiavetti N; Sitler RW; Whitehead RL
J Commun Disord; 1989 Aug; 22(4):243-64. PubMed ID: 2794107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Untrained listeners' ratings of speech disorders in a group with cleft palate: a comparison with speech and language pathologists' ratings.
Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(5):656-74. PubMed ID: 18821109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Transforming assessment of speech in children with cleft palate via online crowdsourcing.
Sescleifer AM; Francoisse CA; Webber JC; Rector JD; Lin AY
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227686. PubMed ID: 31917818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
