These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30522282)

  • 21. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire.
    Hinderink JB; Krabbe PF; Van Den Broek P
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 Dec; 123(6):756-65. PubMed ID: 11112975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of long-term deafness on speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult CLARION cochlear implant users.
    Geier L; Barker M; Fisher L; Opie J
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1999 Apr; 177():80-3. PubMed ID: 10214807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speech Perception and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Mandarin-Speaking Postlingual Deaf Adults With Cochlear Implant: Any Difference With the Intonation Language Users?
    Ho PH; Huang PK; Chen PY; Chu CH; Hsu HM; Chen XX; Lin HC
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Jul; 45(6):e483-e489. PubMed ID: 38865725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Satisfaction With Cochlear Implants in Postlingually Deaf Adults and Its Nonaudiological Predictors: Psychological Distress, Coping Strategies, and Self-Esteem.
    Kobosko J; Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Pankowska A; Skarzynski H
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):605-18. PubMed ID: 25973692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cochlear Implant Users with Otosclerosis: Are Hearing and Quality of Life Outcomes Worse than in Cochlear Implant Users without Otosclerosis?
    Calvino M; Sánchez-Cuadrado I; Gavilán J; Lassaletta L
    Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(6):345-355. PubMed ID: 30739102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Amplitude Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition in Late-Implanted Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users.
    De Ruiter AM; Debruyne JA; Chenault MN; Francart T; Brokx JP
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 25851075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A method for determining precise electrical hearing thresholds in cochlear implant users.
    Rader T; Doms P; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Strieth S; Baumann U
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jul; 57(7):502-509. PubMed ID: 29390897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech intelligibility and subjective benefit in single-sided deaf adults after cochlear implantation.
    Finke M; Strauß-Schier A; Kludt E; Büchner A; Illg A
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():112-119. PubMed ID: 28286233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise, and Health Related Quality of Life.
    Sladen DP; Carlson ML; Dowling BP; Olund AP; DeJong MD; Breneman A; Hollander S; Beatty CW; Neff BA; Driscoll CL
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jun; 39(5):576-581. PubMed ID: 29683995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Electrical dynamic range is only weakly associated with auditory performance and speech recognition in long-term users of cochlear implants.
    Kim SY; Jeon SK; Oh SH; Lee JH; Suh MW; Lee SY; Lim HJ; Park MK
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Aug; 111():170-173. PubMed ID: 29958604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicting social functioning in children with a cochlear implant and in normal-hearing children: the role of emotion regulation.
    Wiefferink CH; Rieffe C; Ketelaar L; Frijns JH
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 76(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 22459035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Health related quality of life in adolescent cochlear implant users.
    Hofmann M; Meloche M; Zwolan TA
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jul; 21(4):198-205. PubMed ID: 32091320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical relevance of quality of life outcome in cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults.
    Klop WM; Boermans PP; Ferrier MB; van den Hout WB; Stiggelbout AM; Frijns JH
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):615-21. PubMed ID: 18451751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Health-related quality of life outcomes following adult cochlear implantation: A prospective cohort study.
    Sladen DP; Peterson A; Schmitt M; Olund A; Teece K; Dowling B; DeJong M; Breneman A; Beatty CW; Carlson ML; Neff BA; Hughes-Borst B; Driscoll CL
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 May; 18(3):130-135. PubMed ID: 28248612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Referral rates of postlingually deafened adult hearing aid users for a cochlear implant candidacy assessment.
    Looi V; Bluett C; Boisvert I
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):919-925. PubMed ID: 28678547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech perception scores in cochlear implant recipients: An analysis of ceiling effects in the CUNY sentence test (Quiet) in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant recipients.
    Ebrahimi-Madiseh A; Eikelboom RH; Jayakody DM; Atlas MD
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016; 17(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 26841858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Recognition of simulated telephone speech by cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17182877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria.
    Rubinstein JT; Parkinson WS; Tyler RS; Gantz BJ
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 10431885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.