158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30522282)
21. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire.
Hinderink JB; Krabbe PF; Van Den Broek P
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 Dec; 123(6):756-65. PubMed ID: 11112975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of long-term deafness on speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult CLARION cochlear implant users.
Geier L; Barker M; Fisher L; Opie J
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1999 Apr; 177():80-3. PubMed ID: 10214807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Speech Perception and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Mandarin-Speaking Postlingual Deaf Adults With Cochlear Implant: Any Difference With the Intonation Language Users?
Ho PH; Huang PK; Chen PY; Chu CH; Hsu HM; Chen XX; Lin HC
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Jul; 45(6):e483-e489. PubMed ID: 38865725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Self-reported hearing quality of life measures in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with bilateral input.
Suneel D; Davidson LS; Lieu J
Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Mar; 21(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 31590628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Satisfaction With Cochlear Implants in Postlingually Deaf Adults and Its Nonaudiological Predictors: Psychological Distress, Coping Strategies, and Self-Esteem.
Kobosko J; Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Pankowska A; Skarzynski H
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):605-18. PubMed ID: 25973692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cochlear Implant Users with Otosclerosis: Are Hearing and Quality of Life Outcomes Worse than in Cochlear Implant Users without Otosclerosis?
Calvino M; Sánchez-Cuadrado I; Gavilán J; Lassaletta L
Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(6):345-355. PubMed ID: 30739102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Amplitude Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition in Late-Implanted Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users.
De Ruiter AM; Debruyne JA; Chenault MN; Francart T; Brokx JP
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 25851075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A method for determining precise electrical hearing thresholds in cochlear implant users.
Rader T; Doms P; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Strieth S; Baumann U
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jul; 57(7):502-509. PubMed ID: 29390897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Speech intelligibility and subjective benefit in single-sided deaf adults after cochlear implantation.
Finke M; Strauß-Schier A; Kludt E; Büchner A; Illg A
Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():112-119. PubMed ID: 28286233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise, and Health Related Quality of Life.
Sladen DP; Carlson ML; Dowling BP; Olund AP; DeJong MD; Breneman A; Hollander S; Beatty CW; Neff BA; Driscoll CL
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jun; 39(5):576-581. PubMed ID: 29683995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Electrical dynamic range is only weakly associated with auditory performance and speech recognition in long-term users of cochlear implants.
Kim SY; Jeon SK; Oh SH; Lee JH; Suh MW; Lee SY; Lim HJ; Park MK
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Aug; 111():170-173. PubMed ID: 29958604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predicting social functioning in children with a cochlear implant and in normal-hearing children: the role of emotion regulation.
Wiefferink CH; Rieffe C; Ketelaar L; Frijns JH
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 76(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 22459035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Health related quality of life in adolescent cochlear implant users.
Hofmann M; Meloche M; Zwolan TA
Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jul; 21(4):198-205. PubMed ID: 32091320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical relevance of quality of life outcome in cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults.
Klop WM; Boermans PP; Ferrier MB; van den Hout WB; Stiggelbout AM; Frijns JH
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):615-21. PubMed ID: 18451751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Health-related quality of life outcomes following adult cochlear implantation: A prospective cohort study.
Sladen DP; Peterson A; Schmitt M; Olund A; Teece K; Dowling B; DeJong M; Breneman A; Beatty CW; Carlson ML; Neff BA; Hughes-Borst B; Driscoll CL
Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 May; 18(3):130-135. PubMed ID: 28248612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Referral rates of postlingually deafened adult hearing aid users for a cochlear implant candidacy assessment.
Looi V; Bluett C; Boisvert I
Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):919-925. PubMed ID: 28678547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Speech perception scores in cochlear implant recipients: An analysis of ceiling effects in the CUNY sentence test (Quiet) in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant recipients.
Ebrahimi-Madiseh A; Eikelboom RH; Jayakody DM; Atlas MD
Cochlear Implants Int; 2016; 17(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 26841858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Recognition of simulated telephone speech by cochlear implant users.
Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17182877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
