These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30522282)

  • 41. Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria.
    Rubinstein JT; Parkinson WS; Tyler RS; Gantz BJ
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 10431885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Determining cochlear implant users' true noise tolerance: use of speech reception threshold in noise testing.
    Poissant SF; Bero EM; Busekroos L; Shao W
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 24518402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Integrating Emotion Perception in Rehabilitation Programs for Cochlear Implant Users: A Call for a More Comprehensive Approach.
    Valentin O; Lehmann A; Nguyen D; Paquette S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 May; 67(5):1635-1642. PubMed ID: 38619441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: reproducibility and discrimination function in cochlear implant patients.
    Hey M; Hocke T; Hedderich J; Müller-Deile J
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):895-902. PubMed ID: 25140602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Speech understanding in noise with the Roger Pen, Naida CI Q70 processor, and integrated Roger 17 receiver in a multi-talker network.
    De Ceulaer G; Bestel J; Mülder HE; Goldbeck F; de Varebeke SP; Govaerts PJ
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 May; 273(5):1107-14. PubMed ID: 25983309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Speech perception after cochlear implantation over a 4-year time period.
    Oh SH; Kim CS; Kang EJ; Lee DS; Lee HJ; Chang SO; Ahn SH; Hwang CH; Park HJ; Koo JW
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Jan; 123(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 12701730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Cochlear™ Nucleus
    Razza S; Zaccone M; Meli A; Cristofari E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():71-75. PubMed ID: 29224769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. SAS-CIS preference study in postlingually deafened adults implanted with the CLARION cochlear implant.
    Osberger MJ; Fisher L
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1999 Apr; 177():74-9. PubMed ID: 10214806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Quality-of-life benefit from cochlear implantation in the elderly.
    Vermeire K; Brokx JP; Wuyts FL; Cochet E; Hofkens A; Van de Heyning PH
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Mar; 26(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 15793403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Speech perception and communication ability over the telephone by Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants.
    Wu CM; Liu TC; Wang NM; Chao WC
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Aug; 77(8):1295-302. PubMed ID: 23768483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Neural Processing of Musical and Vocal Emotions Through Cochlear Implants Simulation.
    Ahmed DG; Paquette S; Zeitouni A; Lehmann A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 May; 49(3):143-151. PubMed ID: 28958161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of technological advances on cochlear implant performance in adults.
    Lenarz M; Joseph G; Sönmez H; Büchner A; Lenarz T
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Dec; 121(12):2634-40. PubMed ID: 22109764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):858-863. PubMed ID: 30261771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Residual speech perception and cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults.
    Gomaa NA; Rubinstein JT; Lowder MW; Tyler RS; Gantz BJ
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 14663353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessment of early language development in Turkish children with a cochlear implant using the TEDIL test.
    Koşaner J; Deniz H; Uruk D; Deniz M; Kara E; Amann E
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 May; 18(3):153-161. PubMed ID: 28293989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Early-deafened adult cochlear implant users: assessment of outcomes.
    Kaplan DM; Shipp DB; Chen JM; Ng AH; Nedzelski JM
    J Otolaryngol; 2003 Aug; 32(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 14587565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Musical background not associated with self-perceived hearing performance or speech perception in postlingual cochlear-implant users.
    Fuller C; Free R; Maat B; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1009-16. PubMed ID: 22894221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Is the digit triplet test an effective and acceptable way to assess speech recognition in adults using cochlear implants in a home environment?
    Cullington HE; Aidi T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Mar; 18(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 28120703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.