202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30522312)
1. Segmentation of binaural room impulse responses for speech intelligibility prediction.
Kokabi O; Brinkmann F; Weinzierl S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):2793. PubMed ID: 30522312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Binaural prediction of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms with multiple noise sources.
Lavandier M; Jelfs S; Culling JF; Watkins AJ; Raimond AP; Makin SJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):218-31. PubMed ID: 22280586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
Collin B; Lavandier M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of the influence of reverberation on binaural speech intelligibility in noise and in quiet.
Rennies J; Brand T; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 22087928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microscopic prediction of speech intelligibility in spatially distributed speech-shaped noise for normal-hearing listeners.
Geravanchizadeh M; Fallah A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):4004-15. PubMed ID: 26723354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modeling the effects of a single reflection on binaural speech intelligibility.
Rennies J; Warzybok A; Brand T; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1556-67. PubMed ID: 24606290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of speech intelligibility in spatial noise and reverberation for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Beutelmann R; Brand T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):331-42. PubMed ID: 16875230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech intelligibility prediction in reverberation: Towards an integrated model of speech transmission, spatial unmasking, and binaural de-reverberation.
Leclère T; Lavandier M; Culling JF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3335-45. PubMed ID: 26093423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of binaural speech intelligibility against noise in rooms.
Lavandier M; Culling JF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):387-99. PubMed ID: 20058985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of overlap-masking on binaural reverberant word intelligibility.
Libbey B; Rogers PH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3141-51. PubMed ID: 15603159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision, extension, and evaluation of a binaural speech intelligibility model.
Beutelmann R; Brand T; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2479-97. PubMed ID: 20370031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revision and validation of a binaural model for speech intelligibility in noise.
Jelfs S; Culling JF; Lavandier M
Hear Res; 2011 May; 275(1-2):96-104. PubMed ID: 21156201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A dissociation between speech understanding and perceived reverberation.
Ellis GM; Zahorik P
Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 379():52-58. PubMed ID: 31075611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Amplitude-mapping effects on speech intelligibility with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants.
van Hoesel R; Böhm M; Battmer RD; Beckschebe J; Lenarz T
Ear Hear; 2005 Aug; 26(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 16079633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement and Prediction of Binaural-Temporal Integration of Speech Reflections.
Rennies J; Warzybok A; Brand T; Kollmeier B
Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519854267. PubMed ID: 31234732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of room acoustical parameters on speech reception thresholds and spatial release from masking.
Biberger T; Ewert SD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Oct; 146(4):2188. PubMed ID: 31671969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]