These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30522312)

  • 21. Prior listening in rooms improves speech intelligibility.
    Brandewie E; Zahorik P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):291-9. PubMed ID: 20649224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Objective Assessment of Binaural Benefit from Acoustical Treatment in Real Primary School Classrooms.
    Minelli G; Puglisi GE; Astolfi A; Hauth C; Warzybok A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 May; 20(10):. PubMed ID: 37239574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of spatial separation in distance on the intelligibility of speech in rooms.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):757-67. PubMed ID: 25698010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech intelligibility in rooms: Effect of prior listening exposure interacts with room acoustics.
    Zahorik P; Brandewie EJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):74. PubMed ID: 27475133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Measuring the effects of reverberation and noise on sentence intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
    George EL; Goverts ST; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1429-39. PubMed ID: 20689027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modelling binaural unmasking and the intelligibility of speech in noise and reverberation for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Vicente T; Buchholz JM; Lavandier M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Nov; 150(5):3275. PubMed ID: 34852607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Measuring and modeling speech intelligibility in real and loudspeaker-based virtual sound environments.
    Ahrens A; Marschall M; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():307-317. PubMed ID: 30867112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
    George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of spectral characteristics of early reflections on speech intelligibility.
    Arweiler I; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):996-1005. PubMed ID: 21877812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech intelligibility improvements with hearing aids using bilateral and binaural adaptive multichannel Wiener filtering based noise reduction.
    Cornelis B; Moonen M; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4743-55. PubMed ID: 22712947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improved binaural speech reception thresholds through small symmetrical separation of speech and noise.
    Wagner L; Geiling L; Hauth C; Hocke T; Plontke S; Rahne T
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236469. PubMed ID: 32756594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Listening through hearing aids affects spatial perception and speech intelligibility in normal-hearing listeners.
    Cubick J; Buchholz JM; Best V; Lavandier M; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):2896. PubMed ID: 30522291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Role of binaural hearing in speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking using vocoded speech.
    Garadat SN; Litovsky RY; Yu G; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2522-35. PubMed ID: 19894832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech intelligibility among modulated and spatially distributed noise sources.
    Culling JF; Mansell ER
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2254-61. PubMed ID: 23556593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A joint framework for blind prediction of binaural speech intelligibility and perceived listening effort.
    Rennies J; Röttges S; Huber R; Hauth CF; Brand T
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108598. PubMed ID: 35995688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prediction of speech intelligibility using pseudo-binaural room impulse responses.
    Kokabi O; Brinkmann F; Weinzierl S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Apr; 145(4):EL329. PubMed ID: 31046300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modeling Sluggishness in Binaural Unmasking of Speech for Maskers With Time-Varying Interaural Phase Differences.
    Hauth CF; Brand T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216517753547. PubMed ID: 29338577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The benefit of head orientation to speech intelligibility in noise.
    Grange JA; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):703-12. PubMed ID: 26936554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.