212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30523235)
21. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Volume Scanning (ABVS) Compared to Handheld Ultrasonography With Breast MRI as the Gold Standard.
Schmachtenberg C; Fischer T; Hamm B; Bick U
Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):954-961. PubMed ID: 28336007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Differential Diagnosis of Breast Category 3 and 4 Nodules Through BI-RADS Classification in Conjunction with Shear Wave Elastography.
Wang M; Yang Z; Liu C; Yan J; Zhang W; Sun J; Cui G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 27988221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of automated breast volume scanning to hand-held ultrasound and mammography.
Wang ZL; Xu JH; Li JL; Huang Y; Tang J
Radiol Med; 2012 Dec; 117(8):1287-93. PubMed ID: 22744341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound.
Lin X; Wang J; Han F; Fu J; Li A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21420814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast US-BI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions with calcifications.
Cheng M; Tong W; Luo J; Li M; Liang J; Pan F; Pan J; Zheng Y; Xie X
Clin Radiol; 2020 Dec; 75(12):934-941. PubMed ID: 32814625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of small breast lesions.
Du YR; Wu Y; Chen M; Gu XG
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 70(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 29710688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Diagnostic Value of 3D Power Doppler Ultrasound Combined With VOCAL in the Vascular Distribution of Breast Masses.
Wang H; Yan B; Yue L; He M; Liu Y; Li H
Acad Radiol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 31053481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations.
Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Lai XJ; Sun Q
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3190-200. PubMed ID: 22386134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ultrasound Elastography Combined With BI-RADS-US Classification System: Is It Helpful for the Diagnostic Performance of Conventional Ultrasonography?
Hao SY; Jiang QC; Zhong WJ; Zhao XB; Yao JY; Li LJ; Luo BM; Ou B; Zhi H
Clin Breast Cancer; 2016 Jun; 16(3):e33-41. PubMed ID: 26639065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Value of contrast-enhanced mammography combined with the Kaiser score for clinical decision-making regarding tomosynthesis BI-RADS 4A lesions.
Rong X; Kang Y; Xue J; Han P; Li Z; Yang G; Shi G
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7439-7447. PubMed ID: 35639141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Nonmasslike enhancement at breast MR imaging: the added value of mammography and US for lesion categorization.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Trop I; Chopier J; David J; Lalonde L; Darai E; Rouzier R; Uzan S
Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 21771958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultrasound BI-RADS to assess benign and malignant breast lesions.
Shi XQ; Li JL; Wan WB; Huang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):960-6. PubMed ID: 25701532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Incorporating Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound into the BI-RADS Scoring System Improves Accuracy in Breast Tumor Diagnosis: A Preliminary Study in China.
Xiao X; Dong L; Jiang Q; Guan X; Wu H; Luo B
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 42(11):2630-2638. PubMed ID: 27544439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Can Ultrasound Elastography Help Better Manage Mammographic BI-RADS Category 4 Breast Lesions?
Gu Y; Tian J; Ran H; Ren W; Chang C; Yuan J; Kang C; Deng Y; Wang H; Luo B; Guo S; Zhou Q; Xue E; Zhan W; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang C; Chen M; Gu Y; Xu J; Chen W; Zhang Y; Li J; Wang H; Jiang Y
Clin Breast Cancer; 2022 Jun; 22(4):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 34815174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The clinical utility of automated breast volume scanner: a pilot study of 139 cases.
Kim YW; Kim SK; Youn HJ; Choi EJ; Jung SH
J Breast Cancer; 2013 Sep; 16(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 24155763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Breast cancer staging: Combined digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging.
Girometti R; Tomkova L; Cereser L; Zuiani C
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():188-195. PubMed ID: 30292265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison between automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) versus hand-held ultrasound as a second look procedure after magnetic resonance imaging.
Girometti R; Zanotel M; Londero V; Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C
Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3767-3775. PubMed ID: 28120030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Is there an extraclinical value of automated breast volume scanner compared with hand-held ultrasound?: A pilot study.
Zhan J; Diao XH; Pang Y; Wang Y; Chen L; Chen Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Sep; 96(37):e7765. PubMed ID: 28906361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Deep learning combining mammography and ultrasound images to predict the malignancy of BI-RADS US 4A lesions in women with dense breasts: a diagnostic study.
Yang Y; Zhong Y; Li J; Feng J; Gong C; Yu Y; Hu Y; Gu R; Wang H; Liu F; Mei J; Jiang X; Wang J; Yao Q; Wu W; Liu Q; Yao H
Int J Surg; 2024 May; 110(5):2604-2613. PubMed ID: 38348891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of malignant non-mass breast lesions and exploration of diagnostic criteria.
Zhang F; Jin L; Li G; Jia C; Shi Q; Du L; Wu R
Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 94(1120):20200880. PubMed ID: 33560894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
