These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30523916)
1. Cascaded systems analysis of a-Se/a-Si and a-InGaZnO TFT passive and active pixel sensors for tomosynthesis. Sengupta A; Zhao C; Konstantinidis A; Kanicki J Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025012. PubMed ID: 30523916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Amorphous In-Ga-Zn-O thin-film transistor active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis. Zhao C; Kanicki J Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091902. PubMed ID: 25186389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional cascaded system analysis of a 50 µm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis. Zhao C; Vassiljev N; Konstantinidis AC; Speller RD; Kanicki J Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1994-2017. PubMed ID: 28072394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Large area CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis: Analysis, modeling, and characterization. Zhao C; Kanicki J; Konstantinidis AC; Patel T Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6294-308. PubMed ID: 26520722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Theoretical investigation of the noise performance of active pixel imaging arrays based on polycrystalline silicon thin film transistors. Koniczek M; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Liang AK; Zhao Q Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3491-3503. PubMed ID: 28376261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technical assessment of 2D and 3D imaging performance of an IGZO-based flat-panel X-ray detector. Sheth NM; Uneri A; Helm PA; Zbijewski W; Siewerdsen JH Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3053-3066. PubMed ID: 35363391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of a high fill factor, indirect detection prototype flat-panel imager for mammography. El-Mohri Y; Antonuk LE; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Sawant A Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):315-27. PubMed ID: 17278517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 50 μm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis. Zhao C; Konstantinidis AC; Zheng Y; Anaxagoras T; Speller RD; Kanicki J Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):8977-9001. PubMed ID: 26540090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging. Hu YH; Zhao W Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system. Zhao B; Zhao W Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1978-87. PubMed ID: 18561674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward Scintillator High-Gain Avalanche Rushing Photoconductor Active Matrix Flat Panel Imager (SHARP-AMFPI): Initial fabrication and characterization. Scheuermann JR; Howansky A; Hansroul M; Léveillé S; Tanioka K; Zhao W Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):794-802. PubMed ID: 29171067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental characterization of a direct conversion amorphous selenium detector with thicker conversion layer for dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast imaging. Scaduto DA; Tousignant O; Zhao W Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3965-3977. PubMed ID: 28543761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physical and psychophysical characterization of a novel clinical system for digital mammography. Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Bertolini M; Borasi G; Golinelli P; Acchiappati D; Gallo E Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5139-48. PubMed ID: 19994524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems. Marshall NW Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Empirical and theoretical investigation of the noise performance of indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for diagnostic radiology. Siewerdsen JH; Antonuk LE; el-Mohri Y; Yorkston J; Huang W; Boudry JM; Cunningham IA Med Phys; 1997 Jan; 24(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 9029542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Physical characterization and performance comparison of active- and passive-pixel CMOS detectors for mammography. Elbakri IA; McIntosh BJ; Rickey DW Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1743-55. PubMed ID: 19242050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. Vedantham S; Karellas A; Suryanarayanan S; Albagli D; Han S; Tkaczyk EJ; Landberg CE; Opsahl-Ong B; Granfors PR; Levis I; D'Orsi CJ; Hendrick RE Med Phys; 2000 Mar; 27(3):558-67. PubMed ID: 10757607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency. Zhao W; Rowlands JA Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1819-33. PubMed ID: 9434965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems. Marshall NW Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]