343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30524705)
21. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging screening for a surgical decision regarding the approach for anterior spine fusion at the cervicothoracic junction.
Fraser JF; Diwan AD; Peterson M; O'Brien MF; Mintz DN; Khan SN; Sandhu HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(7):675-81. PubMed ID: 11923658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Screening of the spine in adolescents: inter- and intra-rater reliability and measurement error of commonly used clinical tests.
Aartun E; Degerfalk A; Kentsdotter L; Hestbaek L
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Feb; 15():37. PubMed ID: 24512306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinicians' Ability to Detect a Palpable Difference in Spinal Stiffness Compared With a Mechanical Device.
Kawchuk GN; Miazga S; Pagé I; Swain M; De Carvalho D; Funabashi M; Breen A; Wong A
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2019 Feb; 42(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 31000343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Interrater reliability of the modified scapular assistance test with and without handheld weights.
Kopkow C; Lange T; Schmitt J; Kasten P
Man Ther; 2015 Dec; 20(6):868-74. PubMed ID: 25935796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interobserver reliability in physical examination of the cervical spine in patients with headache.
Van Suijlekom HA; De Vet HC; Van Den Berg SG; Weber WE
Headache; 2000; 40(7):581-6. PubMed ID: 10940097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Spinal palpation for lumbar segmental mobility and pain provocation: an interexaminer reliability study.
Schneider M; Erhard R; Brach J; Tellin W; Imbarlina F; Delitto A
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008; 31(6):465-73. PubMed ID: 18722203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Test-retest reliability of myofascial trigger point detection in hip and thigh areas.
Rozenfeld E; Finestone AS; Moran U; Damri E; Kalichman L
J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2017 Oct; 21(4):914-919. PubMed ID: 29037648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The frequency and presentation of upper thoracic spinous process deviations, their relationship to articular morphology, and the potential influence on static palpation techniques.
Yelverton C; Zipfel B; Williams S; Peterson C
J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2024 Jan; 37():1-10. PubMed ID: 38432788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of single and composites of selected motion palpation and pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint.
Arab AM; Abdollahi I; Joghataei MT; Golafshani Z; Kazemnejad A
Man Ther; 2009 Apr; 14(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 18373938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Thoracic segmental flexion during cervical forward bending.
Fiebert IM; Spyropoulos T; Peterman D; Dotson L
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 1993 Jan; 3(4):80-5. PubMed ID: 24573143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reliability of pain and stiffness assessments in clinical manual lumbar spine examination.
Maher C; Adams R
Phys Ther; 1994 Sep; 74(9):801-9; discussion 809-11. PubMed ID: 8066107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Interobserver reliability of osteopathic palpatory diagnostic tests of the lumbar spine: improvements from consensus training.
Degenhardt BF; Snider KT; Snider EJ; Johnson JC
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2005 Oct; 105(10):465-73. PubMed ID: 16314679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Intraexaminer reliability of identifying a dysfunctional segment in the thoracic and lumbar spine.
Potter L; McCarthy C; Oldham J
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006; 29(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 16584944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Inter-examiner and intra-examiner agreement for assessing sacroiliac anatomical landmarks using palpation and observation: pilot study.
O'Haire C; Gibbons P
Man Ther; 2000 Feb; 5(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 10688955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Functional Movement Screen: a reliability study.
Teyhen DS; Shaffer SW; Lorenson CL; Halfpap JP; Donofry DF; Walker MJ; Dugan JL; Childs JD
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2012 Jun; 42(6):530-40. PubMed ID: 22585621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Interrater and intrarater agreements of magnetic resonance imaging findings in the lumbar spine: significant variability across degenerative conditions.
Fu MC; Buerba RA; Long WD; Blizzard DJ; Lischuk AW; Haims AH; Grauer JN
Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2442-8. PubMed ID: 24642053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic palpation of the spine: a review of procedures and assessment of their reliability.
Russell R
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1983 Dec; 6(4):181-3. PubMed ID: 6668455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interexaminer reliability of eight evaluative dimensions of lumbar segmental abnormality.
Keating JC; Bergmann TF; Jacobs GE; Finer BA; Larson K
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990 Oct; 13(8):463-70. PubMed ID: 2146357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Are chiropractic tests for the lumbo-pelvic spine reliable and valid? A systematic critical literature review.
Hestbaek L; Leboeuf-Yde C
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 May; 23(4):258-75. PubMed ID: 10820299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Interrater reliability of identifying indicators of posterior ligamentous complex disruption when plain films are indeterminate in thoracolumbar injuries.
Schweitzer KM; Vaccaro AR; Harrop JS; Hurlbert J; Carrino JA; Rechtine GR; Schwartz DG; Alanay A; Sharma DK; Anderson DG; Lee JY; Arnold PM
J Orthop Sci; 2007 Sep; 12(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 17909928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
