These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30525978)

  • 21. Opt-In and Opt-Out Consent Procedures for the Reuse of Routinely Recorded Health Data in Scientific Research and Their Consequences for Consent Rate and Consent Bias: Systematic Review.
    de Man Y; Wieland-Jorna Y; Torensma B; de Wit K; Francke AL; Oosterveld-Vlug MG; Verheij RA
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Feb; 25():e42131. PubMed ID: 36853745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patients' Willingness to Provide Their Clinical Data for Research Purposes and Acceptance of Different Consent Models: Findings From a Representative Survey of Patients With Cancer.
    Köngeter A; Schickhardt C; Jungkunz M; Bergbold S; Mehlis K; Winkler EC
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Aug; 24(8):e37665. PubMed ID: 36006690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Process evaluation of specialist nurse implementation of a soft opt-out organ donation system in Wales.
    Noyes J; Mclaughlin L; Morgan K; Roberts A; Moss B; Stephens M; Walton P
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Jun; 19(1):414. PubMed ID: 31234832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Bias of results in clinical research due to method of informed consent].
    Appels CW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Mar; 151(12):681-2. PubMed ID: 17447592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Parent perspectives on consent for the linkage of data to evaluate vaccine safety: a randomised trial of opt-in and opt-out consent.
    Berry JG; Ryan P; Duszynski KM; Braunack-Mayer AJ; Carlson J; Xafis V; Gold MS;
    Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):483-94. PubMed ID: 23568940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Challenges arising when seeking broad consent for health research data sharing: a qualitative study of perspectives in Thailand.
    Cheah PY; Jatupornpimol N; Hanboonkunupakarn B; Khirikoekkong N; Jittamala P; Pukrittayakamee S; Day NPJ; Parker M; Bull S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Nov; 19(1):86. PubMed ID: 30404642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preferences for opt-in and opt-out enrollment and consent models in biobank research: a national survey of Veterans Administration patients.
    Kaufman D; Bollinger J; Dvoskin R; Scott J
    Genet Med; 2012 Sep; 14(9):787-94. PubMed ID: 22538255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Parental opinions regarding an opt-out consent process for inpatient pediatric prospective observational research in the US.
    Fernandes DM; Roland AP; Morris MC
    Pragmat Obs Res; 2017; 8():1-8. PubMed ID: 28176926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sharing longitudinal, non-biological birth cohort data: a cross-sectional analysis of parent consent preferences.
    Manhas KP; Dodd SX; Page S; Letourneau N; Adair CE; Cui X; Tough SC
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2018 Nov; 18(1):97. PubMed ID: 30419910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Oncology patients overwhelmingly support tissue banking.
    Bryant J; Sanson-Fisher R; Fradgley E; Regan T; Hobden B; Ackland SP
    BMC Cancer; 2015 May; 15():413. PubMed ID: 25981796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Opt-Out Parental Consent in Online Surveys: Ethical Considerations.
    Harris J; Porcellato L
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Jul; 13(3):223-229. PubMed ID: 29629822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biobanking in Israel 2016-17; expressed perceptions versus real life enrollment.
    Koren G; Beller D; Laifenfeld D; Grossman I; Shalev V
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):63. PubMed ID: 29149849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A trial of consent procedures for future research with clinically derived biological samples.
    Vermeulen E; Schmidt MK; Aaronson NK; Kuenen M; Baas-Vrancken Peeters MJ; van der Poel H; Horenblas S; Boot H; Verwaal VJ; Cats A; van Leeuwen FE
    Br J Cancer; 2009 Nov; 101(9):1505-12. PubMed ID: 19861997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ethical and practical challenges to studying patients who opt out of large-scale biorepository research.
    Rosenbloom ST; Madison JL; Brothers KB; Bowton EA; Clayton EW; Malin BA; Roden DM; Pulley J
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2013 Dec; 20(e2):e221-5. PubMed ID: 23886923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of individual clinical outcomes on trial participants' perspectives on enrollment in emergency research without consent.
    Whitesides LW; Baren JM; Biros MH; Fleischman RJ; Govindarajan PR; Jones EB; Pancioli AM; Pentz RD; Scicluna VM; Wright DW; Dickert NW
    Clin Trials; 2017 Apr; 14(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 28359192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.
    Stryker JE; Wray RJ; Emmons KM; Winer E; Demetri G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16242898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stakeholder perspectives regarding alternate approaches to informed consent for comparative effectiveness research.
    Morain SR; Tambor E; Moloney R; Kass NE; Tunis S; Hallez K; Faden RR
    Learn Health Syst; 2018 Apr; 2(2):e10047. PubMed ID: 31245580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Opt-out as an acceptable method of obtaining consent in medical research: a short report.
    Vellinga A; Cormican M; Hanahoe B; Bennett K; Murphy AW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Apr; 11():40. PubMed ID: 21470399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimizing primary care research participation: a comparison of three recruitment methods in data-sharing studies.
    Lord PA; Willis TA; Carder P; West RM; Foy R
    Fam Pract; 2016 Apr; 33(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 26921610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Educational video-assisted versus conventional informed consent for trauma-related debridement surgery: a parallel group randomized controlled trial.
    Lin YK; Chen CW; Lee WC; Cheng YC; Lin TY; Lin CJ; Shi L; Tien YC; Kuo LC
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Mar; 19(1):23. PubMed ID: 29523129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.