These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30527067)

  • 1. Hysteroscopic Illumination of Caesarean Scar Defect.
    Tulandi T; Cohen Y
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Dec; 40(12):1551-1552. PubMed ID: 30527067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evaluation of the condition of the uterine scar after cesarean section by echography].
    Titchenko LI; Belousov MA; Zhilenko MI
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1990 Nov; (11):69-70. PubMed ID: 2077921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When a cesarean section scar is more than an innocent bystander in a subsequent pregnancy: Ultrasound to the rescue.
    Singh D; Kaur L
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Jul; 45(6):319-327. PubMed ID: 28440856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position.
    Wang CB; Chiu WW; Lee CY; Sun YL; Lin YH; Tseng CJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 19565535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Silent dehiscence of a caesarean section scar with placenta praevia accreta.
    Maria NE; Mishra N; Mubarek M; Reginald PW
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Jan; 23(1):77. PubMed ID: 12647706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical diagnosis and therapy of uterine scar defects after caesarean section in non-pregnant women.
    Schepker N; Garcia-Rocha GJ; von Versen-Höynck F; Hillemanns P; Schippert C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1417-23. PubMed ID: 25516174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hysteroscopic surgery of ectopic pregnancy in the cesarean section scar.
    Yang Q; Piao S; Wang G; Wang Y; Liu C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(4):432-6. PubMed ID: 19573819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic repair of wide and deep uterine scar dehiscence after cesarean section.
    Donnez O; Jadoul P; Squifflet J; Donnez J
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):974-80. PubMed ID: 17624346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An arterio-venous malformation related to a uterine scar defect, an unusual association.
    Lebreton C; Deffieux X; Vieillefosse S; Maitre S; Vivanti AJ
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 49(6):101733. PubMed ID: 32234561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography.
    Regnard C; Nosbusch M; Fellemans C; Benali N; van Rysselberghe M; Barlow P; Rozenberg S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 23(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 15027020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic and vaginal repair of uterine scar dehiscence following cesarean section as detected by ultrasound.
    Klemm P; Koehler C; Mangler M; Schneider U; Schneider A
    J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 16207118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Dehiscence of the uterine scar after three previous caesarean sections].
    Stein W; Felke B; Schulze U; Emons G
    Ultraschall Med; 2010 Aug; 31(4):410-1. PubMed ID: 19544234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cesarean section scar defects: agreement between transvaginal sonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement.
    Osser OV; Jokubkiene L; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 20034000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is it necessary to correct a caesarean scar defect before a subsequent pregnancy? A report of three cases.
    Szkodziak P; Stępniak A; Czuczwar P; Szkodziak F; Paszkowski T; Woźniak S
    J Int Med Res; 2019 May; 47(5):2248-2255. PubMed ID: 30880523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment for Uterine Isthmocele, A Pouchlike Defect at the Site of a Cesarean Section Scar.
    Setubal A; Alves J; Osório F; Guerra A; Fernandes R; Albornoz J; Sidiroupoulou Z
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 29024799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standardized approach for imaging and measuring Cesarean section scars using ultrasonography.
    Naji O; Abdallah Y; Bij De Vaate AJ; Smith A; Pexsters A; Stalder C; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Lees C; Brölmann HA; Huirne JA; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):252-9. PubMed ID: 21858885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intact removal of spontaneous twin ectopic Caesarean scar pregnancy by office hysteroscopy: case report and literature review.
    Mollo A; Alviggi C; Conforti A; Insabato L; De Placido G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Nov; 29(5):530-3. PubMed ID: 25246120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The value of hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a report of 44 cases.
    Pan Y; Liu MB
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 56(2):139-142. PubMed ID: 28420496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic diagnosis and hysteroscopic management of a viable cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Ozeren S; Corakçi A; Cakiroğlu Y; Coşkun E
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Dec; 33(6):873-7. PubMed ID: 18001457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Labour after caesarean section--the problem of scar dehiscence.
    Davey MR; Moodley J; Hofmeyr GJ
    S Afr Med J; 1987 Jun; 71(12):766-8. PubMed ID: 3603264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.