BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30527130)

  • 1. compound.Cox: Univariate feature selection and compound covariate for predicting survival.
    Emura T; Matsui S; Chen HY
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jan; 168():21-37. PubMed ID: 30527130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gene selection for survival data under dependent censoring: A copula-based approach.
    Emura T; Chen YH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2840-2857. PubMed ID: 24821000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deviance residuals-based sparse PLS and sparse kernel PLS regression for censored data.
    Bastien P; Bertrand F; Meyer N; Maumy-Bertrand M
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 31(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 25286920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survival prediction based on compound covariate under Cox proportional hazard models.
    Emura T; Chen YH; Chen HY
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e47627. PubMed ID: 23112827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. L1 penalized estimation in the Cox proportional hazards model.
    Goeman JJ
    Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):70-84. PubMed ID: 19937997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multi-omics facilitated variable selection in Cox-regression model for cancer prognosis prediction.
    Liu C; Wang X; Genchev GZ; Lu H
    Methods; 2017 Jul; 124():100-107. PubMed ID: 28627406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NCC-AUC: an AUC optimization method to identify multi-biomarker panel for cancer prognosis from genomic and clinical data.
    Zou M; Liu Z; Zhang XS; Wang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 31(20):3330-8. PubMed ID: 26092859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prognostic 4-gene expression signature for squamous cell lung carcinoma.
    Li J; Wang J; Chen Y; Yang L; Chen S
    J Cell Physiol; 2017 Dec; 232(12):3702-3713. PubMed ID: 28160492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring high dimensional data with Butterfly: a novel classification algorithm based on discrete dynamical systems.
    Geraci J; Dharsee M; Nuin P; Haslehurst A; Koti M; Feilotter HE; Evans K
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Mar; 30(5):712-8. PubMed ID: 24149051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. twilight; a Bioconductor package for estimating the local false discovery rate.
    Scheid S; Spang R
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(12):2921-2. PubMed ID: 15817688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. eNetXplorer: an R package for the quantitative exploration of elastic net families for generalized linear models.
    Candia J; Tsang JS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Apr; 20(1):189. PubMed ID: 30991955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
    Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Boosting the discriminatory power of sparse survival models via optimization of the concordance index and stability selection.
    Mayr A; Hofner B; Schmid M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jul; 17():288. PubMed ID: 27444890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity Analysis for Survival Prognostic Prediction with Gene Selection: A Copula Method for Dependent Censoring.
    Yeh CT; Liao GY; Emura T
    Biomedicines; 2023 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 36979776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhancing the Lasso Approach for Developing a Survival Prediction Model Based on Gene Expression Data.
    Kaneko S; Hirakawa A; Hamada C
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():259474. PubMed ID: 26146513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feature selection and nearest centroid classification for protein mass spectrometry.
    Levner I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():68. PubMed ID: 15788095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Constructing molecular classifiers for the accurate prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma.
    Guo L; Ma Y; Ward R; Castranova V; Shi X; Qian Y
    Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Jun; 12(11 Pt 1):3344-54. PubMed ID: 16740756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A gene-expression profiling score for prediction of outcome in patients with follicular lymphoma: a retrospective training and validation analysis in three international cohorts.
    Huet S; Tesson B; Jais JP; Feldman AL; Magnano L; Thomas E; Traverse-Glehen A; Albaud B; Carrère M; Xerri L; Ansell SM; Baseggio L; Reyes C; Tarte K; Boyault S; Haioun C; Link BK; Feugier P; Lopez-Guillermo A; Tilly H; Brice P; Hayette S; Jardin F; Offner F; Sujobert P; Gentien D; Viari A; Campo E; Cerhan JR; Salles G
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Apr; 19(4):549-561. PubMed ID: 29475724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of recurrence-free survival in postoperative non-small cell lung cancer patients by using an integrated model of clinical information and gene expression.
    Lee ES; Son DS; Kim SH; Lee J; Jo J; Han J; Kim H; Lee HJ; Choi HY; Jung Y; Park M; Lim YS; Kim K; Shim Y; Kim BC; Lee K; Huh N; Ko C; Park K; Lee JW; Choi YS; Kim J
    Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Nov; 14(22):7397-404. PubMed ID: 19010856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ensembling Variable Selectors by Stability Selection for the Cox Model.
    Yin QY; Li JL; Zhang CX
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2017; 2017():2747431. PubMed ID: 29270195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.