These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30527597)

  • 1. Event-related potentials differ between true and false memories in the misinformation paradigm.
    Volz K; Stark R; Vaitl D; Ambach W
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Jan; 135():95-105. PubMed ID: 30527597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. P300 latency, but not amplitude or topography, distinguishes between true and false recognition.
    Miller AR; Baratta C; Wynveen C; Rosenfeld JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):354-61. PubMed ID: 11294437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An exploratory high-density EEG investigation of the misinformation effect: Attentional and recollective differences between true and false perceptual memories.
    Kiat JE; Belli RF
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2017 May; 141():199-208. PubMed ID: 28442391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sleep influences neural representations of true and false memories: An event-related potential study.
    Jano S; Romeo J; Hendrickx MD; Schlesewsky M; Chatburn A
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2021 Dec; 186():107553. PubMed ID: 34763072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reported serial positions of true and illusory memories in the Deese/Roediger/McDermott paradigm.
    Prohaska V; DelValle D; Toglia MP; Pittman AE
    Memory; 2016 Aug; 24(7):865-83. PubMed ID: 26275167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Memory Distortion and Its Avoidance: An Event-Related Potentials Study on False Recognition and Correct Rejection.
    Cadavid S; Beato MS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164024. PubMed ID: 27711125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How are false memories distinguishable from true memories in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm? A review of the findings.
    Jou J; Flores S
    Psychol Res; 2013 Nov; 77(6):671-86. PubMed ID: 23266577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural activity during encoding predicts false memories created by misinformation.
    Okado Y; Stark CE
    Learn Mem; 2005; 12(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15687227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of visual imagery on false memories in DRM and misinformation paradigms.
    Robin F; Ménétrier E; Beffara Bret B
    Memory; 2022 Jul; 30(6):725-732. PubMed ID: 33646925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychophysiological correlates of the misinformation effect.
    Volz K; Leonhart R; Stark R; Vaitl D; Ambach W
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Jul; 117():1-9. PubMed ID: 28400245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Putting false memories into context: the effects of odour contexts on correct and false recall
    Woods JA; Dewhurst SA
    Memory; 2019 Mar; 27(3):379-386. PubMed ID: 30139301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychophysiology of false memories in a Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm with visual scenes.
    Baioui A; Ambach W; Walter B; Vaitl D
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(1):e30416. PubMed ID: 22272347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study.
    Boldini A; Beato MS; Cadavid S
    Neuroreport; 2013 Feb; 24(3):108-13. PubMed ID: 23370492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developmental trends in different types of spontaneous false memories: implications for the legal field.
    Otgaar H; Howe ML; Peters M; Sauerland M; Raymaekers L
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(5):666-82. PubMed ID: 23839901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maltreatment increases spontaneous false memories but decreases suggestion-induced false memories in children.
    Otgaar H; Howe ML; Muris P
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2017 Sep; 35(3):376-391. PubMed ID: 28093783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Test-item sequence affects false memory formation: an event-related potential study.
    Chen JC; Li W; Westerberg CE; Tzeng OJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jan; 431(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 18155357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring the consequences of nonbelieved memories in the DRM paradigm.
    Otgaar H; Moldoveanu G; Wang J; Howe ML
    Memory; 2017 Aug; 25(7):922-933. PubMed ID: 28029065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of survival processing and retention interval on true and false recognition in the DRM and category repetition paradigms.
    Parker A; Dagnall N; Abelson A
    Memory; 2019 Mar; 27(3):353-367. PubMed ID: 30130475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trusting our memories: dissociating the neural correlates of confidence in veridical versus illusory memories.
    Kim H; Cabeza R
    J Neurosci; 2007 Nov; 27(45):12190-7. PubMed ID: 17989285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decreased susceptibility to false memories from misinformation in hormonal contraception users.
    Petersen N; Patihis L; Nielsen SE
    Memory; 2015; 23(7):1029-38. PubMed ID: 25142128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.