BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

663 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30528699)

  • 1. Effect of PD-L1 testing on the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in the United States.
    Criss SD; Weaver DT; Sheehan DF; Lee RJ; Pandharipande PV; Kong CY
    Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):180.e11-180.e18. PubMed ID: 30528699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for Patients with Advanced, Unresectable, or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Ineligible for Cisplatin-based Therapy.
    Patterson K; Prabhu V; Xu R; Li H; Meng Y; Zarabi N; Zhong Y; Batteson R; Pellissier J; Keefe S; Grivas P; de Wit R
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 2(5):565-571. PubMed ID: 31412011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab as Second-line Therapy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in Sweden.
    Srivastava T; Prabhu VS; Li H; Xu R; Zarabi N; Zhong Y; Pellissier JM; Perini RF; de Wit R; Mamtani R
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 3(5):663-670. PubMed ID: 31412001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab in Second-line Advanced Bladder Cancer.
    Sarfaty M; Hall PS; Chan KKW; Virik K; Leshno M; Gordon N; Moore A; Neiman V; Rosenbaum E; Goldstein DA
    Eur Urol; 2018 Jul; 74(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 29576265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-Effectiveness of Avelumab Maintenance Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in the United States.
    Peng Y; She Z; Peng L; Liu Q; Yi L; Luo X; Li S; Wang L; Qin S; Wan X; Tan C
    Adv Ther; 2021 Dec; 38(12):5710-5720. PubMed ID: 34693504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab versus Carboplatin-based Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment of PD-L1-positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Ineligible for Cisplatin-based Therapy in the United States.
    Hale O; Patterson K; Lai Y; Meng Y; Li H; Godwin JL; Homet Moreno B; Mamtani R
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2021 Feb; 19(1):e17-e30. PubMed ID: 32826180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score 1% or greater.
    She L; Hu H; Liao M; Xia X; Shi Y; Yao L; Ding D; Zhu Y; Zeng S; Shen L; Huang J; Carbone DP
    Lung Cancer; 2019 Dec; 138():88-94. PubMed ID: 31655368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
    Aziz MIA; Tan LE; Tan WHG; Toh CK; Loke LPY; Pearce F; Ng K
    J Med Econ; 2020 Sep; 23(9):952-960. PubMed ID: 32462958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC that expresses high levels of PD-L1 in Switzerland.
    Bhadhuri A; Insinga R; Guggisberg P; Panje C; Schwenkglenks M
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2019 Dec; 149():w20170. PubMed ID: 31880807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. First-line pembrolizumab in PD-L1 positive non-small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis from the UK health care perspective.
    Hu X; Hay JW
    Lung Cancer; 2018 Sep; 123():166-171. PubMed ID: 30089590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with PD-L1 test for the first-line treatment of NSCLC.
    Wan N; Zhang TT; Hua SH; Lu ZL; Ji B; Li LX; Lu LQ; Huang WJ; Jiang J; Li J
    Cancer Med; 2020 Mar; 9(5):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 31945265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line pembrolizumab treatment for PD-L1 positive, non-small cell lung cancer in China.
    Liao W; Huang J; Hutton D; Li Q
    J Med Econ; 2019 Apr; 22(4):344-349. PubMed ID: 30646794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab for Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-Unresponsive Carcinoma In Situ of the Bladder.
    Wymer KM; Sharma V; Saigal CS; Chamie K; Litwin MS; Packiam VT; Mossanen M; Pagliaro LC; Borah BJ; Boorjian SA
    J Urol; 2021 May; 205(5):1326-1335. PubMed ID: 33347775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the USA.
    Huang M; Lopes GL; Insinga RP; Burke T; Ejzykowicz F; Zhang Y; Feliciano JL
    Immunotherapy; 2019 Dec; 11(17):1463-1478. PubMed ID: 31738117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with varying comorbidity burden.
    Criss SD; Palazzo L; Watson TR; Paquette AM; Sigel K; Wisnivesky J; Kong CY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0228288. PubMed ID: 31995619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of PD-L1 testing on the cost-effectiveness and economic impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the second-line treatment of NSCLC.
    Aguiar PN; Perry LA; Penny-Dimri J; Babiker H; Tadokoro H; de Mello RA; Lopes GL
    Ann Oncol; 2017 Sep; 28(9):2256-2263. PubMed ID: 28633409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France.
    Chouaid C; Bensimon L; Clay E; Millier A; Levy-Bachelot L; Huang M; Levy P
    Lung Cancer; 2019 Jan; 127():44-52. PubMed ID: 30642550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy or atezolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma in the United States.
    Slater RL; Lai Y; Zhong Y; Li H; Meng Y; Moreno BH; Godwin JL; Frenkl T; Sonpavde GP; Mamtani R
    J Med Econ; 2020 Sep; 23(9):967-977. PubMed ID: 32412387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-Effectiveness of Cemiplimab Versus Standard of Care in the United States for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression ≥50.
    Kuznik A; Smare C; Chen CI; Venkatachalam M; Keeping S; Atsou K; Xu Y; Wilson F; Guyot P; Chan K; Glowienka E; Konidaris G
    Value Health; 2022 Feb; 25(2):203-214. PubMed ID: 35094793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pembrolizumab for Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
    Gallacher D; Armoiry X; Auguste P; Court R; Mantopoulos T; Patterson J; De Santis M; Cresswell J; Mistry H
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Jan; 37(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 30030817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.