These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3052903)

  • 21. Inter-laboratory study of human in vitro toxicogenomics-based tests as alternative methods for evaluating chemical carcinogenicity: a bioinformatics perspective.
    Herwig R; Gmuender H; Corvi R; Bloch KM; Brandenburg A; Castell J; Ceelen L; Chesne C; Doktorova TY; Jennen D; Jennings P; Limonciel A; Lock EA; McMorrow T; Phrakonkham P; Radford R; Slattery C; Stierum R; Vilardell M; Wittenberger T; Yildirimman R; Ryan M; Rogiers V; Kleinjans J
    Arch Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 90(9):2215-2229. PubMed ID: 26525393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Summary of carcinogenic potency and positivity for 492 rodent carcinogens in the carcinogenic potency database.
    Gold LS; Slone TH; Bernstein L
    Environ Health Perspect; 1989 Feb; 79():259-72. PubMed ID: 2707207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
    Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An analysis of genetic toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity data: I. Identification of carcinogens using surrogate endpoints.
    Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Cimino MC; Benz RD; Contrera JF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 16386343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of discounting certain tumor types/sites on evaluations of carcinogenicity in laboratory animals.
    Karstadt M; Haseman JK
    Am J Ind Med; 1997 May; 31(5):485-94. PubMed ID: 9099349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The weight of the evidence among group C carcinogens.
    Engler R; Rinde E; Frick C; Quest J
    Qual Assur; 1991 Oct; 1(1):51-69. PubMed ID: 1669970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Carcinogenicity testing of chemicals.
    Hess R
    J Toxicol Sci; 1987 May; 12(2):259-70. PubMed ID: 3305972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hydroquinone: an evaluation of the human risks from its carcinogenic and mutagenic properties.
    McGregor D
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2007; 37(10):887-914. PubMed ID: 18027166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Initiation/promotion versus complete carcinogenicity in the rodent liver.
    Ashby J; Elliott BM; Lefevre PA; Styles J; Longstaff E
    Environ Health Perspect; 1983 Apr; 50():339-46. PubMed ID: 6873024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prediction of carcinogenicity from two versus four sex-species groups in the carcinogenic potency database.
    Gold LS; Slone TH
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1993 May; 39(1):143-57. PubMed ID: 8492327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prediction of cancer potency using a battery of mutation and toxicity data.
    Travis CC; Saulsbury AW; Pack SA
    Mutagenesis; 1990 May; 5(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 2385175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The genetic toxicity database of the National Toxicology Program: evaluation of the relationships between genetic toxicity and carcinogenicity.
    Tennant RW
    Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Dec; 96():47-51. PubMed ID: 1820276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The mutagenic and carcinogenic activity of chemical compounds].
    Rakitskiĭ VN; Turusov VS
    Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk; 2005; (3):7-9. PubMed ID: 15852703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity using the DEREK system for 30 chemicals currently being tested by the National Toxicology Program. The DEREK Collaborative Group.
    Marchant CA
    Environ Health Perspect; 1996 Oct; 104 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):1065-73. PubMed ID: 8933056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
    Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Chemical toxicity and chemical carcinogenesis. Is there a causal connection? A comparative morphological evaluation of 1500 experiments.
    Huff JE
    IARC Sci Publ; 1992; (116):437-75. PubMed ID: 1428093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the potential carcinogenicity and genetic toxicity to humans of the herbicide acetochlor.
    Ashby J; Kier L; Wilson AG; Green T; Lefevre PA; Tinwell H; Willis GA; Heydens WF; Clapp MJ
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1996 Sep; 15(9):702-35. PubMed ID: 8880207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Supplement to the Carcinogenic Potency Database (CPDB): results of animal bioassays published in the general literature in 1993 to 1994 and by the National Toxicology Program in 1995 to 1996.
    Gold LS; Manley NB; Slone TH; Rohrbach L
    Environ Health Perspect; 1999 Aug; 107 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):527-600. PubMed ID: 10421768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Carcinogenicity categorization of chemicals-new aspects to be considered in a European perspective.
    Bolt HM; Foth H; Hengstler JG; Degen GH
    Toxicol Lett; 2004 Jun; 151(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 15177638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison between carcinogenicity and mutagenicity based on chemicals evaluated in the IARC monographs.
    Bartsch H; Tomatis L
    Environ Health Perspect; 1983 Jan; 47():305-17. PubMed ID: 6337827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.