These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30529158)

  • 1. Comparison of Survival After Aortic Valve Replacement With Mitroflow or Perimount Prostheses.
    Aasbjerg K; Mortensen PE; Nørgaard MA; Rytgaard HC; Gerds TA; Søgaard P; Torp-Pedersen C; Mortensen RN; Bagge BJ; Køber L; Nielsen PH
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019; 31(3):350-358. PubMed ID: 30529158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Durability after aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow versus the Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis: a single-centre experience in 2393 patients.
    Nielsen PH; Hjortdal V; Modrau IS; Jensen H; Kimose HH; Terp K; Poulsen SH; Smerup M; Nielsen SL
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1705-10. PubMed ID: 26984983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of early hemodynamic performance of 3 aortic valve bioprostheses.
    Ugur M; Suri RM; Daly RC; Dearani JA; Park SJ; Joyce LD; Burkhart HM; Greason KL; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1940-6. PubMed ID: 24530199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do differences in early hemodynamic performance of current generation biologic aortic valves predict outcomes 1 year following surgery?
    Thalji NM; Suri RM; Michelena HI; Greason KL; Dearani JA; Daly RC; Joyce LD; Stulak JM; Burkhart HM; Li Z; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jan; 149(1):163-73.e2. PubMed ID: 25439772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Premature Structural Failure of Trifecta Bioprosthesis in Midterm Follow-up: A Single-Center Study.
    Kattach H; Shah BN; Harden S; Barlow CW; Miskolczi S; Velissaris T; Ohri SK
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Nov; 112(5):1424-1431. PubMed ID: 33338482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
    Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements.
    Isaacs AJ; Shuhaiber J; Salemi A; Isom OW; Sedrakyan A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 May; 149(5):1262-9.e3. PubMed ID: 25791947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term survival after Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve replacement in Western Denmark: a multi-centre observational study.
    Krasniqi L; Kronby MP; Riber LPS
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2021 May; 16(1):130. PubMed ID: 33990211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hemodynamic Performance of Endovascular Valves as Valve-in-Valve in Small Stented Bioprosthesis.
    Kuehnel RU; Hartrumpf M; Erb M; Albes JM
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Apr; 65(3):225-230. PubMed ID: 27517167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The new St Jude Trifecta versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna and Magna Ease aortic bioprosthesis: is there a hemodynamic superiority?
    Wendt D; Thielmann M; Plicht B; Aßmann J; Price V; Neuhäuser M; Jakob H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 May; 147(5):1553-60. PubMed ID: 23870159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: Revisiting prosthesis choice in patients younger than 50 years old.
    Schnittman SR; Adams DH; Itagaki S; Toyoda N; Egorova NN; Chikwe J
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Feb; 155(2):539-547.e9. PubMed ID: 29110948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sizing strategy is a major determinant of postoperative pressure gradients in commonly implanted stented tissue valves.
    Diab M; Faerber G; Bothe W; Lemke S; Breuer M; Walther M; Doenst T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Oct; 44(4):e289-94. PubMed ID: 23904132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of early redo surgery rates in Mosaic porcine and Perimount bovine pericardial valves.
    Webb J; Parkin D; Tøndel K; Simitsis P; Roxburgh J; Chambers JB
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Oct; 54(4):724-728. PubMed ID: 29579171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early structural valve deterioration and reoperation associated with the mitroflow aortic valve.
    Axtell AL; Chang DC; Melnitchouk S; Jassar AS; Tolis G; Villavicencio MA; Sundt TM; D'Alessandro DA
    J Card Surg; 2018 Dec; 33(12):778-786. PubMed ID: 30525247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term results of the Mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis in over 800 patients: limited durability and mechanisms of dysfunction.
    Ius F; Schulz J; Roumieh M; Fleissner F; Ismail I; Tudorache I; Warnecke G; Martens A; Shrestha M; Boethig D; Haverich A; Cebotari S
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Aug; 52(2):264-271. PubMed ID: 28838100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transcatheter Aortic and Mitral Valve-in-Valve Implantation for Failed Surgical Bioprosthetic Valves: An 8-Year Single-Center Experience.
    Ye J; Cheung A; Yamashita M; Wood D; Peng D; Gao M; Thompson CR; Munt B; Moss RR; Blanke P; Leipsic J; Dvir D; Webb JG
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1735-44. PubMed ID: 26476608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves: implications from 12,569 implants.
    Johnston DR; Soltesz EG; Vakil N; Rajeswaran J; Roselli EE; Sabik JF; Smedira NG; Svensson LG; Lytle BW; Blackstone EH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Apr; 99(4):1239-47. PubMed ID: 25662439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fate of aortic bioprostheses: An 18-year experience.
    Piccardo A; Blossier JD; Le Guyader A; Orsel I; Sekkal S; Cornu E; Laskar M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Mar; 151(3):754-761.e1. PubMed ID: 26651959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Wang Y; Chen S; Shi J; Li G; Dong N
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26675564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mitroflow and Perimount Magna 10 years outcomes a direct propensity match analysis to assess reintervention rates and long follow-up mortality.
    Theologou T; Harky A; Shaw M; Harrington D; Kuduvalli M; Oo A; Field M
    J Card Surg; 2019 Nov; 34(11):1279-1287. PubMed ID: 31508847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.